Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Henning Schulte-Huxel
  • Timothy J. Silverman
  • Daniel J. Friedman
  • Michael G. Deceglie
  • Michael Rienäcker
  • Manuel Schnabel
  • Emily L. Warren
  • Raphael Niepelt
  • Malte R. Vogt
  • Pauls Stradins
  • Robby Peibst
  • Adele C. Tamboli

External Research Organisations

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  • Institute for Solar Energy Research (ISFH)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics
EditorsRolf Brendel, Jef Poortmans, Arthur Weeber, Giso Hahn, Christophe Ballif, Stefan Glunz, Pierre-Jean Ribeyron
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2018
EventSiliconPV 2018: The 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics - Lausanne, Switzerland
Duration: 19 Mar 201821 Mar 2018

Publication series

NameAIP Conference Proceedings
Volume1999
ISSN (Print)0094-243X
ISSN (electronic)1551-7616

Abstract

We present a yield analysis of tandem devices consisting of GaInP top cells on Si or GaAs bottom cells with different terminal configurations. Inputs are the I-V and external quantum efficiency of the individual subcells and the irradiance-dependent module temperature of the bottom cell. Our model calculates the temperature of the tandem module by taking into account the performance, spectral working range and luminescent coupling of the different tandem devices, enabling an irradiance- and weather-dependent yield analysis for these modules. We apply the model to compare two types of two junction devices, a GaInP/GaAs monolithically grown tandem device, and a GaInP top cell stacked on a Si bottom cell, the present two best dual junction devices. When the subcells are series connected both technologies perform equally well. The performance of the GaInP/Si can be significantly improved relatively by 5.8% using 3-terminal (3T) devices with a back-contacted bottom cell instead of a 2T configuration, showing a possible benefit when using Si back contacted cells. For GaInP/Si, the 3T-device works as well as the 4T-device, enabling the integration of monolithic tandem cells into modules at comparably high efficiencies.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells. / Schulte-Huxel, Henning; Silverman, Timothy J.; Friedman, Daniel J. et al.
SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics. ed. / Rolf Brendel; Jef Poortmans; Arthur Weeber; Giso Hahn; Christophe Ballif; Stefan Glunz; Pierre-Jean Ribeyron. 2018. 120002 (AIP Conference Proceedings; Vol. 1999).

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Schulte-Huxel, H, Silverman, TJ, Friedman, DJ, Deceglie, MG, Rienäcker, M, Schnabel, M, Warren, EL, Niepelt, R, Vogt, MR, Stradins, P, Peibst, R & Tamboli, AC 2018, Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells. in R Brendel, J Poortmans, A Weeber, G Hahn, C Ballif, S Glunz & P-J Ribeyron (eds), SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics., 120002, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1999, SiliconPV 2018: The 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, Lausanne, Switzerland, 19 Mar 2018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049319
Schulte-Huxel, H., Silverman, T. J., Friedman, D. J., Deceglie, M. G., Rienäcker, M., Schnabel, M., Warren, E. L., Niepelt, R., Vogt, M. R., Stradins, P., Peibst, R., & Tamboli, A. C. (2018). Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells. In R. Brendel, J. Poortmans, A. Weeber, G. Hahn, C. Ballif, S. Glunz, & P.-J. Ribeyron (Eds.), SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics Article 120002 (AIP Conference Proceedings; Vol. 1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5049319
Schulte-Huxel H, Silverman TJ, Friedman DJ, Deceglie MG, Rienäcker M, Schnabel M et al. Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells. In Brendel R, Poortmans J, Weeber A, Hahn G, Ballif C, Glunz S, Ribeyron PJ, editors, SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics. 2018. 120002. (AIP Conference Proceedings). doi: 10.1063/1.5049319
Schulte-Huxel, Henning ; Silverman, Timothy J. ; Friedman, Daniel J. et al. / Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells. SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics. editor / Rolf Brendel ; Jef Poortmans ; Arthur Weeber ; Giso Hahn ; Christophe Ballif ; Stefan Glunz ; Pierre-Jean Ribeyron. 2018. (AIP Conference Proceedings).
Download
@inproceedings{0b452cc0752e4a8895b468dbc4005848,
title = "Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells",
abstract = "We present a yield analysis of tandem devices consisting of GaInP top cells on Si or GaAs bottom cells with different terminal configurations. Inputs are the I-V and external quantum efficiency of the individual subcells and the irradiance-dependent module temperature of the bottom cell. Our model calculates the temperature of the tandem module by taking into account the performance, spectral working range and luminescent coupling of the different tandem devices, enabling an irradiance- and weather-dependent yield analysis for these modules. We apply the model to compare two types of two junction devices, a GaInP/GaAs monolithically grown tandem device, and a GaInP top cell stacked on a Si bottom cell, the present two best dual junction devices. When the subcells are series connected both technologies perform equally well. The performance of the GaInP/Si can be significantly improved relatively by 5.8% using 3-terminal (3T) devices with a back-contacted bottom cell instead of a 2T configuration, showing a possible benefit when using Si back contacted cells. For GaInP/Si, the 3T-device works as well as the 4T-device, enabling the integration of monolithic tandem cells into modules at comparably high efficiencies.",
author = "Henning Schulte-Huxel and Silverman, {Timothy J.} and Friedman, {Daniel J.} and Deceglie, {Michael G.} and Michael Rien{\"a}cker and Manuel Schnabel and Warren, {Emily L.} and Raphael Niepelt and Vogt, {Malte R.} and Pauls Stradins and Robby Peibst and Tamboli, {Adele C.}",
note = "Funding Information: H. Schulte-Huxel acknowledges support for the Research Fellowship by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (grant agreement No: SCHU 3206/1-1). Funding for this work at NREL was provided by DOE through EERE contract SETP DE-EE00030299 and under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; SiliconPV 2018: The 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics ; Conference date: 19-03-2018 Through 21-03-2018",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1063/1.5049319",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780735417151",
series = "AIP Conference Proceedings",
editor = "Rolf Brendel and Jef Poortmans and Arthur Weeber and Giso Hahn and Christophe Ballif and Stefan Glunz and Pierre-Jean Ribeyron",
booktitle = "SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Yield analysis and comparison of GaInP/Si and GaInP/GaAs multi-terminal tandem solar cells

AU - Schulte-Huxel, Henning

AU - Silverman, Timothy J.

AU - Friedman, Daniel J.

AU - Deceglie, Michael G.

AU - Rienäcker, Michael

AU - Schnabel, Manuel

AU - Warren, Emily L.

AU - Niepelt, Raphael

AU - Vogt, Malte R.

AU - Stradins, Pauls

AU - Peibst, Robby

AU - Tamboli, Adele C.

N1 - Funding Information: H. Schulte-Huxel acknowledges support for the Research Fellowship by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (grant agreement No: SCHU 3206/1-1). Funding for this work at NREL was provided by DOE through EERE contract SETP DE-EE00030299 and under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/8/10

Y1 - 2018/8/10

N2 - We present a yield analysis of tandem devices consisting of GaInP top cells on Si or GaAs bottom cells with different terminal configurations. Inputs are the I-V and external quantum efficiency of the individual subcells and the irradiance-dependent module temperature of the bottom cell. Our model calculates the temperature of the tandem module by taking into account the performance, spectral working range and luminescent coupling of the different tandem devices, enabling an irradiance- and weather-dependent yield analysis for these modules. We apply the model to compare two types of two junction devices, a GaInP/GaAs monolithically grown tandem device, and a GaInP top cell stacked on a Si bottom cell, the present two best dual junction devices. When the subcells are series connected both technologies perform equally well. The performance of the GaInP/Si can be significantly improved relatively by 5.8% using 3-terminal (3T) devices with a back-contacted bottom cell instead of a 2T configuration, showing a possible benefit when using Si back contacted cells. For GaInP/Si, the 3T-device works as well as the 4T-device, enabling the integration of monolithic tandem cells into modules at comparably high efficiencies.

AB - We present a yield analysis of tandem devices consisting of GaInP top cells on Si or GaAs bottom cells with different terminal configurations. Inputs are the I-V and external quantum efficiency of the individual subcells and the irradiance-dependent module temperature of the bottom cell. Our model calculates the temperature of the tandem module by taking into account the performance, spectral working range and luminescent coupling of the different tandem devices, enabling an irradiance- and weather-dependent yield analysis for these modules. We apply the model to compare two types of two junction devices, a GaInP/GaAs monolithically grown tandem device, and a GaInP top cell stacked on a Si bottom cell, the present two best dual junction devices. When the subcells are series connected both technologies perform equally well. The performance of the GaInP/Si can be significantly improved relatively by 5.8% using 3-terminal (3T) devices with a back-contacted bottom cell instead of a 2T configuration, showing a possible benefit when using Si back contacted cells. For GaInP/Si, the 3T-device works as well as the 4T-device, enabling the integration of monolithic tandem cells into modules at comparably high efficiencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051923095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.5049319

DO - 10.1063/1.5049319

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85051923095

SN - 9780735417151

T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings

BT - SiliconPV 2018, the 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics

A2 - Brendel, Rolf

A2 - Poortmans, Jef

A2 - Weeber, Arthur

A2 - Hahn, Giso

A2 - Ballif, Christophe

A2 - Glunz, Stefan

A2 - Ribeyron, Pierre-Jean

T2 - SiliconPV 2018: The 8th International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics

Y2 - 19 March 2018 through 21 March 2018

ER -