Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • O. Hach
  • H. Verdonck
  • J. D. Polman
  • C. Balzani
  • S. Müller
  • J. Rieke
  • H. Hennings

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Nordex Energy GmbH
  • DLR-Institute of Aeroelastics
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number052083
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume2020
Issue number1618
Publication statusPublished - 22 Sept 2020
EventScience of Making Torque from Wind 2020, TORQUE 2020 - Virtual, Online, Netherlands
Duration: 28 Sept 20202 Oct 2020

Abstract

As rotor diameters and blade flexibility are increasing, current and future generation wind turbines are more susceptible to aeroelastic instabilities. It is thus important to know the prediction capabilities of state-of-the-art simulation tools in regards of the onset of aeroelastic instability. This article presents results of a code-to-code comparison of five different simulation codes using a representative wind turbine model. It is shown that the models are in good agreement in terms of isolated structural dynamics and steady state aeroelastics. The more complex the test cases become, the more significant are the differences in the results. In the final step of comparison, the aeroelastic stability limit is determined through a runaway analysis. The instability onset is predicted at different wind speeds and the underlying mechanisms differ between the tools. A Campbell diagram is used to correlate the findings of time domain simulation tools with those of a linear analysis in the frequency domain.

Keywords

    aeroelastic stability, instability, flutter, wind turbine, stability, code-to-code, code to code, OpenFAST, HAWC2, GH Bladed, Simpack, alaska

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools. / Hach, O.; Verdonck, H.; Polman, J. D. et al.
In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 2020, No. 1618, 052083, 22.09.2020, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Hach, O, Verdonck, H, Polman, JD, Balzani, C, Müller, S, Rieke, J & Hennings, H 2020, 'Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools', Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2020, no. 1618, 052083, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052083
Hach, O., Verdonck, H., Polman, J. D., Balzani, C., Müller, S., Rieke, J., & Hennings, H. (2020). Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020(1618), 1-9. Article 052083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052083
Hach O, Verdonck H, Polman JD, Balzani C, Müller S, Rieke J et al. Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020 Sept 22;2020(1618):1-9. 052083. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048, 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052083
Hach, O. ; Verdonck, H. ; Polman, J. D. et al. / Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020 ; Vol. 2020, No. 1618. pp. 1-9.
Download
@article{fb14240f3f3a4511b3342c80c28a9f46,
title = "Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools",
abstract = "As rotor diameters and blade flexibility are increasing, current and future generation wind turbines are more susceptible to aeroelastic instabilities. It is thus important to know the prediction capabilities of state-of-the-art simulation tools in regards of the onset of aeroelastic instability. This article presents results of a code-to-code comparison of five different simulation codes using a representative wind turbine model. It is shown that the models are in good agreement in terms of isolated structural dynamics and steady state aeroelastics. The more complex the test cases become, the more significant are the differences in the results. In the final step of comparison, the aeroelastic stability limit is determined through a runaway analysis. The instability onset is predicted at different wind speeds and the underlying mechanisms differ between the tools. A Campbell diagram is used to correlate the findings of time domain simulation tools with those of a linear analysis in the frequency domain.",
keywords = "aeroelastic stability, instability, flutter, wind turbine, stability, code-to-code, code to code, OpenFAST, HAWC2, GH Bladed, Simpack, alaska",
author = "O. Hach and H. Verdonck and Polman, {J. D.} and C. Balzani and S. M{\"u}ller and J. Rieke and H. Hennings",
note = "Funding Information: This work is a collaboration of four partners from research and industry in the frame of work package 4.2 of the German national research project SmartBlades2. This project is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, grant no. 0324032 A/C.; Science of Making Torque from Wind 2020, TORQUE 2020 ; Conference date: 28-09-2020 Through 02-10-2020",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048",
language = "English",
volume = "2020",
pages = "1--9",
number = "1618",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wind turbine stability: Comparison of state-of-the-art aeroelastic simulation tools

AU - Hach, O.

AU - Verdonck, H.

AU - Polman, J. D.

AU - Balzani, C.

AU - Müller, S.

AU - Rieke, J.

AU - Hennings, H.

N1 - Funding Information: This work is a collaboration of four partners from research and industry in the frame of work package 4.2 of the German national research project SmartBlades2. This project is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, grant no. 0324032 A/C.

PY - 2020/9/22

Y1 - 2020/9/22

N2 - As rotor diameters and blade flexibility are increasing, current and future generation wind turbines are more susceptible to aeroelastic instabilities. It is thus important to know the prediction capabilities of state-of-the-art simulation tools in regards of the onset of aeroelastic instability. This article presents results of a code-to-code comparison of five different simulation codes using a representative wind turbine model. It is shown that the models are in good agreement in terms of isolated structural dynamics and steady state aeroelastics. The more complex the test cases become, the more significant are the differences in the results. In the final step of comparison, the aeroelastic stability limit is determined through a runaway analysis. The instability onset is predicted at different wind speeds and the underlying mechanisms differ between the tools. A Campbell diagram is used to correlate the findings of time domain simulation tools with those of a linear analysis in the frequency domain.

AB - As rotor diameters and blade flexibility are increasing, current and future generation wind turbines are more susceptible to aeroelastic instabilities. It is thus important to know the prediction capabilities of state-of-the-art simulation tools in regards of the onset of aeroelastic instability. This article presents results of a code-to-code comparison of five different simulation codes using a representative wind turbine model. It is shown that the models are in good agreement in terms of isolated structural dynamics and steady state aeroelastics. The more complex the test cases become, the more significant are the differences in the results. In the final step of comparison, the aeroelastic stability limit is determined through a runaway analysis. The instability onset is predicted at different wind speeds and the underlying mechanisms differ between the tools. A Campbell diagram is used to correlate the findings of time domain simulation tools with those of a linear analysis in the frequency domain.

KW - aeroelastic stability

KW - instability

KW - flutter

KW - wind turbine

KW - stability

KW - code-to-code

KW - code to code

KW - OpenFAST

KW - HAWC2

KW - GH Bladed

KW - Simpack

KW - alaska

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108989203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052048

M3 - Article

VL - 2020

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

IS - 1618

M1 - 052083

T2 - Science of Making Torque from Wind 2020, TORQUE 2020

Y2 - 28 September 2020 through 2 October 2020

ER -

By the same author(s)