Details
Translated title of the contribution | How do female academics interpret their success? |
---|---|
Original language | German |
Article number | 1 |
Journal | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Abstract
Female students in mechanical engineering have better chances to achieve an academic career than women in other academic disciplines. In this article we reconstruct how female mechanical engineers interpret for themselves their success. Our reconstruction of the self-interpretations focusses on the “internal biographical mechanisms of regulation” (GIEGEL, 1988). The empirical material encompasses three qualitative primary data collections with female professors, female doctoral candidates, and female students of mechanical engineering. The methods used are narrative and problem-centered interviews. These primary data collections are then analyzed by applying the method of thematic coding. The analysis shows an extraordinarily high level of accordance between the three groups. The first accordance relates to family up-bringing, which was aimed at enabling the children to make individual decisions Further agree-ments concern: 1. biographical resources: a high level of self-confidence of being successful by realizing their own objectives; 2. the dominant interest in technology, based in the natural sciences; 3. the relation to the performance principle: the female mechanical engineers embrace great determination for perfor-mance as an essential basis for realizing one’s own interests. These three dimensions specify their “internal biographical mechanism of regulation.” It can be assumed that women who opt for mechanical engineering very often possess a distinct aspiration for success. Pre-sumably they would be successful in most other disciplines.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- General Social Sciences
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1, 2017.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Wie deuten Wissenschaftlerinnen im Maschinenbau ihren Erfolg?
AU - Barlösius, Eva
AU - Fisser, Grit
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Female students in mechanical engineering have better chances to achieve an academic career than women in other academic disciplines. In this article we reconstruct how female mechanical engineers interpret for themselves their success. Our reconstruction of the self-interpretations focusses on the “internal biographical mechanisms of regulation” (GIEGEL, 1988). The empirical material encompasses three qualitative primary data collections with female professors, female doctoral candidates, and female students of mechanical engineering. The methods used are narrative and problem-centered interviews. These primary data collections are then analyzed by applying the method of thematic coding. The analysis shows an extraordinarily high level of accordance between the three groups. The first accordance relates to family up-bringing, which was aimed at enabling the children to make individual decisions Further agree-ments concern: 1. biographical resources: a high level of self-confidence of being successful by realizing their own objectives; 2. the dominant interest in technology, based in the natural sciences; 3. the relation to the performance principle: the female mechanical engineers embrace great determination for perfor-mance as an essential basis for realizing one’s own interests. These three dimensions specify their “internal biographical mechanism of regulation.” It can be assumed that women who opt for mechanical engineering very often possess a distinct aspiration for success. Pre-sumably they would be successful in most other disciplines.
AB - Female students in mechanical engineering have better chances to achieve an academic career than women in other academic disciplines. In this article we reconstruct how female mechanical engineers interpret for themselves their success. Our reconstruction of the self-interpretations focusses on the “internal biographical mechanisms of regulation” (GIEGEL, 1988). The empirical material encompasses three qualitative primary data collections with female professors, female doctoral candidates, and female students of mechanical engineering. The methods used are narrative and problem-centered interviews. These primary data collections are then analyzed by applying the method of thematic coding. The analysis shows an extraordinarily high level of accordance between the three groups. The first accordance relates to family up-bringing, which was aimed at enabling the children to make individual decisions Further agree-ments concern: 1. biographical resources: a high level of self-confidence of being successful by realizing their own objectives; 2. the dominant interest in technology, based in the natural sciences; 3. the relation to the performance principle: the female mechanical engineers embrace great determination for perfor-mance as an essential basis for realizing one’s own interests. These three dimensions specify their “internal biographical mechanism of regulation.” It can be assumed that women who opt for mechanical engineering very often possess a distinct aspiration for success. Pre-sumably they would be successful in most other disciplines.
KW - Akademische Karriere
KW - Erfolg
KW - Frauen
KW - Maschinenbau
KW - MINT
KW - Narratives interview
KW - Problemzentriertes interview
KW - Sekundäranalyse
KW - Thematisches Kodieren
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006001867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Artikel
AN - SCOPUS:85006001867
VL - 18
JO - Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung
JF - Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung
SN - 1438-5627
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -