What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Satoko Fujiwara
  • Tim Jensen

External Research Organisations

  • University of Tokyo
  • University of Southern Denmark
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-184
Number of pages26
JournalMethod and Theory in the Study of Religion
Volume32
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2020
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.

Keywords

    EASR, globalization, IAHR, International Association for the History of Religions, Marburg, NAASR, NVMEN, Religionswissenschaft, scientific study of religion, study of religions, Zwi Werblowsky

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims. / Fujiwara, Satoko; Jensen, Tim.
In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, Vol. 32, No. 2, 06.05.2020, p. 159-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Fujiwara, S & Jensen, T 2020, 'What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims', Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 159-184. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341478
Fujiwara, S., & Jensen, T. (2020). What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 32(2), 159-184. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341478
Fujiwara S, Jensen T. What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 2020 May 6;32(2):159-184. doi: 10.1163/15700682-12341478
Fujiwara, Satoko ; Jensen, Tim. / What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. 2020 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 159-184.
Download
@article{910c3536b38c413695935092079aefb0,
title = "What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims",
abstract = "Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to {"}International Association for the Study of Religions.{"} His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.",
keywords = "EASR, globalization, IAHR, International Association for the History of Religions, Marburg, NAASR, NVMEN, Religionswissenschaft, scientific study of religion, study of religions, Zwi Werblowsky",
author = "Satoko Fujiwara and Tim Jensen",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1163/15700682-12341478",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "159--184",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much- A nd Not What Wiebe Claims

AU - Fujiwara, Satoko

AU - Jensen, Tim

PY - 2020/5/6

Y1 - 2020/5/6

N2 - Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.

AB - Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.

KW - EASR

KW - globalization

KW - IAHR

KW - International Association for the History of Religions

KW - Marburg

KW - NAASR

KW - NVMEN

KW - Religionswissenschaft

KW - scientific study of religion

KW - study of religions

KW - Zwi Werblowsky

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086357841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15700682-12341478

DO - 10.1163/15700682-12341478

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85086357841

VL - 32

SP - 159

EP - 184

JO - Method and Theory in the Study of Religion

JF - Method and Theory in the Study of Religion

SN - 0943-3058

IS - 2

ER -