What can we learn from seeds? Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalActa Horticulturae
Issue number1187
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2017

Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis, a powerful in vitro propagation pathway, has not reached its full potential due to limitations such as asynchronous differentiation and development of somatic embryos, disturbed polarity, premature germination, early loss of embryogenic potential, and strong genotypic differences in the regeneration efficiency. In contrast, zygotic embryogenesis, a complex, highly organized process, in most cases does not face these problems. In several literature reports the similarity of somatic and zygotic embryos in terms of morphological, histological, biochemical and physiological aspects was shown. On the other hand, pronounced differences between these two types of embryogenesis indicated higher stress levels, less accumulation of storage compounds and a missing distinction of differentiation and germination by a quiescent phase in somatic embryos. Recent reports comparing somatic and zygotic embryos and analyzing the role of the endosperm are summarized in this overview in order to optimize somatic embryogenesis by learning from the situation in seeds.

Keywords

    Endosperm, Germination, Maturation, Metabolites, Proteome, Somatic embryo, Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

What can we learn from seeds? Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis. / Winkelmann, Traud.
In: Acta Horticulturae, No. 1187, 25.11.2017, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Winkelmann T. What can we learn from seeds? Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis. Acta Horticulturae. 2017 Nov 25;(1187):1-11. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1187.1
Winkelmann, Traud. / What can we learn from seeds? Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis. In: Acta Horticulturae. 2017 ; No. 1187. pp. 1-11.
Download
@article{e8a79e8c9d514bbda6883ce34c43251f,
title = "What can we learn from seeds? Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis",
abstract = "Somatic embryogenesis, a powerful in vitro propagation pathway, has not reached its full potential due to limitations such as asynchronous differentiation and development of somatic embryos, disturbed polarity, premature germination, early loss of embryogenic potential, and strong genotypic differences in the regeneration efficiency. In contrast, zygotic embryogenesis, a complex, highly organized process, in most cases does not face these problems. In several literature reports the similarity of somatic and zygotic embryos in terms of morphological, histological, biochemical and physiological aspects was shown. On the other hand, pronounced differences between these two types of embryogenesis indicated higher stress levels, less accumulation of storage compounds and a missing distinction of differentiation and germination by a quiescent phase in somatic embryos. Recent reports comparing somatic and zygotic embryos and analyzing the role of the endosperm are summarized in this overview in order to optimize somatic embryogenesis by learning from the situation in seeds.",
keywords = "Endosperm, Germination, Maturation, Metabolites, Proteome, Somatic embryo, Stress",
author = "Traud Winkelmann",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
day = "25",
doi = "10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1187.1",
language = "English",
pages = "1--11",
number = "1187",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - What can we learn from seeds? Somatic versus zygotic embryogenesis

AU - Winkelmann, Traud

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/11/25

Y1 - 2017/11/25

N2 - Somatic embryogenesis, a powerful in vitro propagation pathway, has not reached its full potential due to limitations such as asynchronous differentiation and development of somatic embryos, disturbed polarity, premature germination, early loss of embryogenic potential, and strong genotypic differences in the regeneration efficiency. In contrast, zygotic embryogenesis, a complex, highly organized process, in most cases does not face these problems. In several literature reports the similarity of somatic and zygotic embryos in terms of morphological, histological, biochemical and physiological aspects was shown. On the other hand, pronounced differences between these two types of embryogenesis indicated higher stress levels, less accumulation of storage compounds and a missing distinction of differentiation and germination by a quiescent phase in somatic embryos. Recent reports comparing somatic and zygotic embryos and analyzing the role of the endosperm are summarized in this overview in order to optimize somatic embryogenesis by learning from the situation in seeds.

AB - Somatic embryogenesis, a powerful in vitro propagation pathway, has not reached its full potential due to limitations such as asynchronous differentiation and development of somatic embryos, disturbed polarity, premature germination, early loss of embryogenic potential, and strong genotypic differences in the regeneration efficiency. In contrast, zygotic embryogenesis, a complex, highly organized process, in most cases does not face these problems. In several literature reports the similarity of somatic and zygotic embryos in terms of morphological, histological, biochemical and physiological aspects was shown. On the other hand, pronounced differences between these two types of embryogenesis indicated higher stress levels, less accumulation of storage compounds and a missing distinction of differentiation and germination by a quiescent phase in somatic embryos. Recent reports comparing somatic and zygotic embryos and analyzing the role of the endosperm are summarized in this overview in order to optimize somatic embryogenesis by learning from the situation in seeds.

KW - Endosperm

KW - Germination

KW - Maturation

KW - Metabolites

KW - Proteome

KW - Somatic embryo

KW - Stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039455325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1187.1

DO - 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1187.1

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Acta Horticulturae

JF - Acta Horticulturae

SN - 0567-7572

IS - 1187

ER -

By the same author(s)