Vision meets visualization: Are animated videos an alternative?

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRequirements Engineering
Subtitle of host publicationFoundation for Software Quality; 26th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2020, Pisa, Italy, March 24–27, 2020, Proceedings
EditorsNazim Madhavji, Liliana Pasquale
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages277-292
Number of pages16
ISBN (electronic)9783030444297
ISBN (print)9783030444280
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2020
Event26th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality - Online, Pisa, Italy
Duration: 24 Mar 202027 Mar 2020
Conference number: 26

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume12045
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (electronic)1611-3349

Abstract

[Context and motivation] Creating a shared understanding of requirements between all parties involved about a future software system is difficult. Imprecise communication can lead to misunderstanding of requirements. Vision videos demonstrate and visualize the functionality, use and impact of a software system before the actual development process starts. They stimulate discussions about the software system and its associated requirements. [Question/problem] Vision videos should be produced with as little effort as possible, in terms of resources and time consumption, yet with sufficient quality. This raises the questions: Does the presentation of a vision video influence its perception by the audience? Do animated vision videos offer an alternative to real videos to communicate a vision? [Principal ideas/results] We conducted an experiment with 20 participants comparing animated and real videos showing the same content. The videos illustrate the population decrease in rural areas and envision a possible solution to counteract the consequences of grocery store closings. The participants suggested own solutions for the problem of grocery store closings, rated the videos and chose their preferred type of video representation. The results of the experiment show no difference in neither the amount of solutions proposed nor the rating of the videos. Likewise, the results show no difference in the preferred type of video representation. [Contribution] Our study indicates that animated vision videos offer an adequate alternative to real videos. Thus, vision video producers have another viable option to choose for achieving a shared understanding of a future software system.

Keywords

    Animation, Requirements engineering, Video, Vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Vision meets visualization: Are animated videos an alternative? / Busch, Melanie; Karras, Oliver; Schneider, Kurt et al.
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality; 26th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2020, Pisa, Italy, March 24–27, 2020, Proceedings. ed. / Nazim Madhavji; Liliana Pasquale. Cham: Springer Verlag, 2020. p. 277-292 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 12045).

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Busch, M, Karras, O, Schneider, K & Ahrens, M 2020, Vision meets visualization: Are animated videos an alternative? in N Madhavji & L Pasquale (eds), Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality; 26th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2020, Pisa, Italy, March 24–27, 2020, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 12045, Springer Verlag, Cham, pp. 277-292, 26th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering, Pisa, Italy, 24 Mar 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_19
Busch, M., Karras, O., Schneider, K., & Ahrens, M. (2020). Vision meets visualization: Are animated videos an alternative? In N. Madhavji, & L. Pasquale (Eds.), Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality; 26th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2020, Pisa, Italy, March 24–27, 2020, Proceedings (pp. 277-292). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 12045). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_19
Busch M, Karras O, Schneider K, Ahrens M. Vision meets visualization: Are animated videos an alternative? In Madhavji N, Pasquale L, editors, Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality; 26th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2020, Pisa, Italy, March 24–27, 2020, Proceedings. Cham: Springer Verlag. 2020. p. 277-292. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_19
Busch, Melanie ; Karras, Oliver ; Schneider, Kurt et al. / Vision meets visualization : Are animated videos an alternative?. Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality; 26th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2020, Pisa, Italy, March 24–27, 2020, Proceedings. editor / Nazim Madhavji ; Liliana Pasquale. Cham : Springer Verlag, 2020. pp. 277-292 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
Download
@inproceedings{66bcce5906fb4300a8e3fd7a6cd12d11,
title = "Vision meets visualization: Are animated videos an alternative?",
abstract = "[Context and motivation] Creating a shared understanding of requirements between all parties involved about a future software system is difficult. Imprecise communication can lead to misunderstanding of requirements. Vision videos demonstrate and visualize the functionality, use and impact of a software system before the actual development process starts. They stimulate discussions about the software system and its associated requirements. [Question/problem] Vision videos should be produced with as little effort as possible, in terms of resources and time consumption, yet with sufficient quality. This raises the questions: Does the presentation of a vision video influence its perception by the audience? Do animated vision videos offer an alternative to real videos to communicate a vision? [Principal ideas/results] We conducted an experiment with 20 participants comparing animated and real videos showing the same content. The videos illustrate the population decrease in rural areas and envision a possible solution to counteract the consequences of grocery store closings. The participants suggested own solutions for the problem of grocery store closings, rated the videos and chose their preferred type of video representation. The results of the experiment show no difference in neither the amount of solutions proposed nor the rating of the videos. Likewise, the results show no difference in the preferred type of video representation. [Contribution] Our study indicates that animated vision videos offer an adequate alternative to real videos. Thus, vision video producers have another viable option to choose for achieving a shared understanding of a future software system.",
keywords = "Animation, Requirements engineering, Video, Vision",
author = "Melanie Busch and Oliver Karras and Kurt Schneider and Maike Ahrens",
note = "Funding information: Acknowledgement. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft (DFG) under Grant No.: 289386339, project ViViReq. (2017–2019).; 26th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering : Foundation for Software Quality, REFSQ 2020 ; Conference date: 24-03-2020 Through 27-03-2020",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030444280",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "277--292",
editor = "Nazim Madhavji and Liliana Pasquale",
booktitle = "Requirements Engineering",
address = "Germany",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Vision meets visualization

T2 - 26th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering

AU - Busch, Melanie

AU - Karras, Oliver

AU - Schneider, Kurt

AU - Ahrens, Maike

N1 - Conference code: 26

PY - 2020/3/18

Y1 - 2020/3/18

N2 - [Context and motivation] Creating a shared understanding of requirements between all parties involved about a future software system is difficult. Imprecise communication can lead to misunderstanding of requirements. Vision videos demonstrate and visualize the functionality, use and impact of a software system before the actual development process starts. They stimulate discussions about the software system and its associated requirements. [Question/problem] Vision videos should be produced with as little effort as possible, in terms of resources and time consumption, yet with sufficient quality. This raises the questions: Does the presentation of a vision video influence its perception by the audience? Do animated vision videos offer an alternative to real videos to communicate a vision? [Principal ideas/results] We conducted an experiment with 20 participants comparing animated and real videos showing the same content. The videos illustrate the population decrease in rural areas and envision a possible solution to counteract the consequences of grocery store closings. The participants suggested own solutions for the problem of grocery store closings, rated the videos and chose their preferred type of video representation. The results of the experiment show no difference in neither the amount of solutions proposed nor the rating of the videos. Likewise, the results show no difference in the preferred type of video representation. [Contribution] Our study indicates that animated vision videos offer an adequate alternative to real videos. Thus, vision video producers have another viable option to choose for achieving a shared understanding of a future software system.

AB - [Context and motivation] Creating a shared understanding of requirements between all parties involved about a future software system is difficult. Imprecise communication can lead to misunderstanding of requirements. Vision videos demonstrate and visualize the functionality, use and impact of a software system before the actual development process starts. They stimulate discussions about the software system and its associated requirements. [Question/problem] Vision videos should be produced with as little effort as possible, in terms of resources and time consumption, yet with sufficient quality. This raises the questions: Does the presentation of a vision video influence its perception by the audience? Do animated vision videos offer an alternative to real videos to communicate a vision? [Principal ideas/results] We conducted an experiment with 20 participants comparing animated and real videos showing the same content. The videos illustrate the population decrease in rural areas and envision a possible solution to counteract the consequences of grocery store closings. The participants suggested own solutions for the problem of grocery store closings, rated the videos and chose their preferred type of video representation. The results of the experiment show no difference in neither the amount of solutions proposed nor the rating of the videos. Likewise, the results show no difference in the preferred type of video representation. [Contribution] Our study indicates that animated vision videos offer an adequate alternative to real videos. Thus, vision video producers have another viable option to choose for achieving a shared understanding of a future software system.

KW - Animation

KW - Requirements engineering

KW - Video

KW - Vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083964538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_19

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_19

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783030444280

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 277

EP - 292

BT - Requirements Engineering

A2 - Madhavji, Nazim

A2 - Pasquale, Liliana

PB - Springer Verlag

CY - Cham

Y2 - 24 March 2020 through 27 March 2020

ER -

By the same author(s)