Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 378-386 |
Journal | SAE Technical Papers |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 14 Apr 2020 |
Publication status | Published - 15 Sept 2020 |
Event | SAE 2020 International Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, PFL 2020 - Virtual, Online, Poland Duration: 22 Sept 2020 → 24 Sept 2020 |
Abstract
Fuel spray breakup in combustion engines and hence all following processes are determined by the primary atomization. Due to high optical densities as well as high velocities and structures in the µm-range, the measurement of sprays in the near nozzle region is extremely challenging. Therefore, the processes of the primary breakup are not fully understood yet, although these processes are very important for simulation of spray atomization. One important property of a spray is the velocity distribution close to the nozzle outlet. With the newly developed Structural Image Velocimetry (SIV) technique it is possible to visualize spray structures in the near nozzle region and track them via cross-correlation algorithms, so that two-dimensional velocity fields of the spray can be derived. The initial SIV technique is improved with a new high-speed setup, allowing to observe also the temporal behavior of the spray velocities during the injection. Within this work, velocities of potential future diesel fuels were measured under engine relevant conditions with a variation of fuel pressure, fuel temperature and gas pressure based on the ECN Spray A conditions. Velocity fields of Oxymethlyenether 3-5 (OME) as an E-Fuel and Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a Bio-Fuel were measured and compared with Gas-To-Liquid Diesel (GTL) as a reference fuel. For constant fuel pressures, the velocity distribution for OME shows significantly different values than for GTL and HVO, having about 15 % lower values and much lower deceleration behavior in downstream direction. Obviously the OME spray has a weaker air-fuel interaction. This can be attributed to a lower density leading to reduced nozzle outlet velocities and a lower Weber number.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Automotive Engineering
- Engineering(all)
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Environmental Science(all)
- Pollution
- Engineering(all)
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: SAE Technical Papers, Vol. 3, No. 1, 15.09.2020, p. 378-386.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Velocity Field Measurements with High Speed Structural Image Velocimetry in the Primary Atomization Region of Future Diesel Fuels
AU - Dageförde, Toni
AU - Gröger, Karsten
AU - Kawaharada, Noritsune
AU - Dinkelacker, Friedrich
N1 - Funding Information: This work is financed by the German Research Association for Combustion Engines (Forschungsvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschinen, FVV) within the project “Spray Diagnostics of Future Diesel Fuels” (FVV No. 6013201). We thank the members of the FVV working group for supporting the research and the publication.
PY - 2020/9/15
Y1 - 2020/9/15
N2 - Fuel spray breakup in combustion engines and hence all following processes are determined by the primary atomization. Due to high optical densities as well as high velocities and structures in the µm-range, the measurement of sprays in the near nozzle region is extremely challenging. Therefore, the processes of the primary breakup are not fully understood yet, although these processes are very important for simulation of spray atomization. One important property of a spray is the velocity distribution close to the nozzle outlet. With the newly developed Structural Image Velocimetry (SIV) technique it is possible to visualize spray structures in the near nozzle region and track them via cross-correlation algorithms, so that two-dimensional velocity fields of the spray can be derived. The initial SIV technique is improved with a new high-speed setup, allowing to observe also the temporal behavior of the spray velocities during the injection. Within this work, velocities of potential future diesel fuels were measured under engine relevant conditions with a variation of fuel pressure, fuel temperature and gas pressure based on the ECN Spray A conditions. Velocity fields of Oxymethlyenether 3-5 (OME) as an E-Fuel and Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a Bio-Fuel were measured and compared with Gas-To-Liquid Diesel (GTL) as a reference fuel. For constant fuel pressures, the velocity distribution for OME shows significantly different values than for GTL and HVO, having about 15 % lower values and much lower deceleration behavior in downstream direction. Obviously the OME spray has a weaker air-fuel interaction. This can be attributed to a lower density leading to reduced nozzle outlet velocities and a lower Weber number.
AB - Fuel spray breakup in combustion engines and hence all following processes are determined by the primary atomization. Due to high optical densities as well as high velocities and structures in the µm-range, the measurement of sprays in the near nozzle region is extremely challenging. Therefore, the processes of the primary breakup are not fully understood yet, although these processes are very important for simulation of spray atomization. One important property of a spray is the velocity distribution close to the nozzle outlet. With the newly developed Structural Image Velocimetry (SIV) technique it is possible to visualize spray structures in the near nozzle region and track them via cross-correlation algorithms, so that two-dimensional velocity fields of the spray can be derived. The initial SIV technique is improved with a new high-speed setup, allowing to observe also the temporal behavior of the spray velocities during the injection. Within this work, velocities of potential future diesel fuels were measured under engine relevant conditions with a variation of fuel pressure, fuel temperature and gas pressure based on the ECN Spray A conditions. Velocity fields of Oxymethlyenether 3-5 (OME) as an E-Fuel and Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a Bio-Fuel were measured and compared with Gas-To-Liquid Diesel (GTL) as a reference fuel. For constant fuel pressures, the velocity distribution for OME shows significantly different values than for GTL and HVO, having about 15 % lower values and much lower deceleration behavior in downstream direction. Obviously the OME spray has a weaker air-fuel interaction. This can be attributed to a lower density leading to reduced nozzle outlet velocities and a lower Weber number.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092735372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4271/2020-01-2112
DO - 10.4271/2020-01-2112
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85092735372
VL - 3
SP - 378
EP - 386
JO - SAE Technical Papers
JF - SAE Technical Papers
SN - 0148-7191
IS - 1
T2 - SAE 2020 International Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, PFL 2020
Y2 - 22 September 2020 through 24 September 2020
ER -