Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 043018 |
| Journal | Physical Review D |
| Volume | 107 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Feb 2023 |
Abstract
Gravitational waves (GWs) create correlations in the arrival times of pulses from different pulsars. The expected correlation μ(γ) as a function of the angle γ between the directions to two pulsars was calculated by Hellings and Downs for an isotropic and unpolarized GW background, and several pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations are working to observe these. We ask: given a set of noise-free observations, are they consistent with that expectation To answer this, we calculate the expected variance σ2(γ) in the correlation for a single GW point source, as pulsar pairs with fixed separation angle γ are swept around the sky. We then use this to derive simple analytic expressions for the variance produced by a set of discrete point sources uniformly scattered in space for two cases of interest: (1) point sources radiating GWs at the same frequency, generating confusion noise, and (2) point sources radiating GWs at distinct nonoverlapping frequencies. By averaging over all pulsar sky positions at fixed separation angle γ, we show how this variance may be cleanly split into cosmic variance and pulsar variance, also demonstrating that measurements of the variance can provide information about the nature of GW sources. In a series of technical appendices, we calculate the mean and variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation for an arbitrary (polarized) point source, quantify the impact of neglecting pulsar terms, and calculate the pulsar and cosmic variance for a Gaussian ensemble. The mean and variance of the Gaussian ensemble may be obtained from the previous discrete-source confusion-noise model in the limit of a high density of weak sources.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Physical Review D, Vol. 107, No. 4, 043018, 15.02.2023.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation
AU - Allen, Bruce
N1 - Funding: Open access publication funded by the Max Planck Society.
PY - 2023/2/15
Y1 - 2023/2/15
N2 - Gravitational waves (GWs) create correlations in the arrival times of pulses from different pulsars. The expected correlation μ(γ) as a function of the angle γ between the directions to two pulsars was calculated by Hellings and Downs for an isotropic and unpolarized GW background, and several pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations are working to observe these. We ask: given a set of noise-free observations, are they consistent with that expectation To answer this, we calculate the expected variance σ2(γ) in the correlation for a single GW point source, as pulsar pairs with fixed separation angle γ are swept around the sky. We then use this to derive simple analytic expressions for the variance produced by a set of discrete point sources uniformly scattered in space for two cases of interest: (1) point sources radiating GWs at the same frequency, generating confusion noise, and (2) point sources radiating GWs at distinct nonoverlapping frequencies. By averaging over all pulsar sky positions at fixed separation angle γ, we show how this variance may be cleanly split into cosmic variance and pulsar variance, also demonstrating that measurements of the variance can provide information about the nature of GW sources. In a series of technical appendices, we calculate the mean and variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation for an arbitrary (polarized) point source, quantify the impact of neglecting pulsar terms, and calculate the pulsar and cosmic variance for a Gaussian ensemble. The mean and variance of the Gaussian ensemble may be obtained from the previous discrete-source confusion-noise model in the limit of a high density of weak sources.
AB - Gravitational waves (GWs) create correlations in the arrival times of pulses from different pulsars. The expected correlation μ(γ) as a function of the angle γ between the directions to two pulsars was calculated by Hellings and Downs for an isotropic and unpolarized GW background, and several pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations are working to observe these. We ask: given a set of noise-free observations, are they consistent with that expectation To answer this, we calculate the expected variance σ2(γ) in the correlation for a single GW point source, as pulsar pairs with fixed separation angle γ are swept around the sky. We then use this to derive simple analytic expressions for the variance produced by a set of discrete point sources uniformly scattered in space for two cases of interest: (1) point sources radiating GWs at the same frequency, generating confusion noise, and (2) point sources radiating GWs at distinct nonoverlapping frequencies. By averaging over all pulsar sky positions at fixed separation angle γ, we show how this variance may be cleanly split into cosmic variance and pulsar variance, also demonstrating that measurements of the variance can provide information about the nature of GW sources. In a series of technical appendices, we calculate the mean and variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation for an arbitrary (polarized) point source, quantify the impact of neglecting pulsar terms, and calculate the pulsar and cosmic variance for a Gaussian ensemble. The mean and variance of the Gaussian ensemble may be obtained from the previous discrete-source confusion-noise model in the limit of a high density of weak sources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149362156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.48550/arXiv.2205.05637
DO - 10.48550/arXiv.2205.05637
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149362156
VL - 107
JO - Physical Review D
JF - Physical Review D
SN - 2470-0010
IS - 4
M1 - 043018
ER -