Validating the predictive capabilities: A key issue in modelling thermomechanical fatigue life

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Paderborn University
  • University of Siegen
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-35
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Structural Integrity Society
Volume29
Issue numberC
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Virtually all models developed to predict thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) behaviour are limited by the fact that life prediction is based on experimental data generated under conditions significantly different from the actual service conditions of most high-temperature components. The current research strongly supports the idea that life models that are closely related to the relevant microstructural processes provide a more reliable basis for life prediction. It will be discussed how microstructural arguments can be used to extend a given life model to loading situations that cannot be simulated satisfactorily in the laboratory and/or estimate the limits within which reliable life predictions can be made. Data are presented that demonstrate that non-conservative life prediction may result despite a seemingly excellent correlation of model predictions with experimentally obtained TMF life. It is emphasized that TMF tests designed to validate a life model should focus on revealing the presence of potential couplings between the various damage mechanisms such as creep, environmental degradation and cyclic plasticity.

Keywords

    crack growth, crack initiation, cyclic stress-strain response, damage evolution, environmental effects, life prediction, microstructure, modelling, thermomechanical fatigue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Validating the predictive capabilities: A key issue in modelling thermomechanical fatigue life. / Maier, H. J.; Christ, H. J.
In: European Structural Integrity Society, Vol. 29, No. C, 2002, p. 25-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Maier HJ, Christ HJ. Validating the predictive capabilities: A key issue in modelling thermomechanical fatigue life. European Structural Integrity Society. 2002;29(C):25-35. doi: 10.1016/S1566-1369(02)80059-0
Maier, H. J. ; Christ, H. J. / Validating the predictive capabilities : A key issue in modelling thermomechanical fatigue life. In: European Structural Integrity Society. 2002 ; Vol. 29, No. C. pp. 25-35.
Download
@article{80d3def60005469a82d93e433d8cc8c4,
title = "Validating the predictive capabilities: A key issue in modelling thermomechanical fatigue life",
abstract = "Virtually all models developed to predict thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) behaviour are limited by the fact that life prediction is based on experimental data generated under conditions significantly different from the actual service conditions of most high-temperature components. The current research strongly supports the idea that life models that are closely related to the relevant microstructural processes provide a more reliable basis for life prediction. It will be discussed how microstructural arguments can be used to extend a given life model to loading situations that cannot be simulated satisfactorily in the laboratory and/or estimate the limits within which reliable life predictions can be made. Data are presented that demonstrate that non-conservative life prediction may result despite a seemingly excellent correlation of model predictions with experimentally obtained TMF life. It is emphasized that TMF tests designed to validate a life model should focus on revealing the presence of potential couplings between the various damage mechanisms such as creep, environmental degradation and cyclic plasticity.",
keywords = "crack growth, crack initiation, cyclic stress-strain response, damage evolution, environmental effects, life prediction, microstructure, modelling, thermomechanical fatigue",
author = "Maier, {H. J.} and Christ, {H. J.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S1566-1369(02)80059-0",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "25--35",
number = "C",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating the predictive capabilities

T2 - A key issue in modelling thermomechanical fatigue life

AU - Maier, H. J.

AU - Christ, H. J.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Virtually all models developed to predict thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) behaviour are limited by the fact that life prediction is based on experimental data generated under conditions significantly different from the actual service conditions of most high-temperature components. The current research strongly supports the idea that life models that are closely related to the relevant microstructural processes provide a more reliable basis for life prediction. It will be discussed how microstructural arguments can be used to extend a given life model to loading situations that cannot be simulated satisfactorily in the laboratory and/or estimate the limits within which reliable life predictions can be made. Data are presented that demonstrate that non-conservative life prediction may result despite a seemingly excellent correlation of model predictions with experimentally obtained TMF life. It is emphasized that TMF tests designed to validate a life model should focus on revealing the presence of potential couplings between the various damage mechanisms such as creep, environmental degradation and cyclic plasticity.

AB - Virtually all models developed to predict thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) behaviour are limited by the fact that life prediction is based on experimental data generated under conditions significantly different from the actual service conditions of most high-temperature components. The current research strongly supports the idea that life models that are closely related to the relevant microstructural processes provide a more reliable basis for life prediction. It will be discussed how microstructural arguments can be used to extend a given life model to loading situations that cannot be simulated satisfactorily in the laboratory and/or estimate the limits within which reliable life predictions can be made. Data are presented that demonstrate that non-conservative life prediction may result despite a seemingly excellent correlation of model predictions with experimentally obtained TMF life. It is emphasized that TMF tests designed to validate a life model should focus on revealing the presence of potential couplings between the various damage mechanisms such as creep, environmental degradation and cyclic plasticity.

KW - crack growth

KW - crack initiation

KW - cyclic stress-strain response

KW - damage evolution

KW - environmental effects

KW - life prediction

KW - microstructure

KW - modelling

KW - thermomechanical fatigue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957036260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1566-1369(02)80059-0

DO - 10.1016/S1566-1369(02)80059-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957036260

VL - 29

SP - 25

EP - 35

JO - European Structural Integrity Society

JF - European Structural Integrity Society

SN - 1566-1369

IS - C

ER -

By the same author(s)