Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum: zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Anna-Katharina Preatorius
  • Christian Herrmann
  • Erin Gerlach
  • Meik Zülsdorf-Kersting
  • Benjamin Heinitz
  • Andreas Nehring

External Research Organisations

  • Universität Zürich (UZH)
  • Pädagogische Hochschule Zürich
  • University of Potsdam
View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionTeaching quality in different subject matters in German-speaking countries—Inbetween genericness and subject-specificity
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)409-446
Number of pages38
JournalUnterrichtswissenschaft
Volume48
Issue number3
Early online date7 Aug 2020
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

Abstract

In this synthesis paper, the current state of research regarding teaching quality is discussed comparing science education, physical education, and history education, by referring to research on teaching in general. A framework with seven dimensions (Praetorius and Charalambous 2018) was used as a comparison base. This framework contains the dimensions of selecting and introducing the content and subject matter methods, cognitive activation, support of practicing, formative assessment, support of all students’ learning, socio-emotional support, and classroom management. The comparison across subject matters showed that subject-specificity was dependent on the level under consideration: On the dimension level, no adaptations and supplementations were deemed necessary. On the level of sub-dimensions, and especially on the level of observable indicators for these sub-dimensions, this was, however, the case. Challenges for future research are discussed.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum: zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik. / Preatorius, Anna-Katharina; Herrmann, Christian; Gerlach, Erin et al.
In: Unterrichtswissenschaft, Vol. 48, No. 3, 09.2020, p. 409-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Preatorius, A-K, Herrmann, C, Gerlach, E, Zülsdorf-Kersting, M, Heinitz, B & Nehring, A 2020, 'Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum: zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik', Unterrichtswissenschaft, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 409-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8
Preatorius, A.-K., Herrmann, C., Gerlach, E., Zülsdorf-Kersting, M., Heinitz, B., & Nehring, A. (2020). Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum: zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48(3), 409-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8
Preatorius AK, Herrmann C, Gerlach E, Zülsdorf-Kersting M, Heinitz B, Nehring A. Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum: zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 2020 Sept;48(3):409-446. Epub 2020 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8
Preatorius, Anna-Katharina ; Herrmann, Christian ; Gerlach, Erin et al. / Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum : zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik. In: Unterrichtswissenschaft. 2020 ; Vol. 48, No. 3. pp. 409-446.
Download
@article{863eb73cad02444baf31029db5648a35,
title = "Unterrichtsqualit{\"a}t in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum: zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik",
abstract = "In this synthesis paper, the current state of research regarding teaching quality is discussed comparing science education, physical education, and history education, by referring to research on teaching in general. A framework with seven dimensions (Praetorius and Charalambous 2018) was used as a comparison base. This framework contains the dimensions of selecting and introducing the content and subject matter methods, cognitive activation, support of practicing, formative assessment, support of all students{\textquoteright} learning, socio-emotional support, and classroom management. The comparison across subject matters showed that subject-specificity was dependent on the level under consideration: On the dimension level, no adaptations and supplementations were deemed necessary. On the level of sub-dimensions, and especially on the level of observable indicators for these sub-dimensions, this was, however, the case. Challenges for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "History education, Instructional quality, Physical education, Science education, Subject matters, Synthesis, Teaching quality",
author = "Anna-Katharina Preatorius and Christian Herrmann and Erin Gerlach and Meik Z{\"u}lsdorf-Kersting and Benjamin Heinitz and Andreas Nehring",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "48",
pages = "409--446",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unterrichtsqualität in den Fachdidaktiken im deutschsprachigen Raum

T2 - zwischen Generik und Fachspezifik

AU - Preatorius, Anna-Katharina

AU - Herrmann, Christian

AU - Gerlach, Erin

AU - Zülsdorf-Kersting, Meik

AU - Heinitz, Benjamin

AU - Nehring, Andreas

PY - 2020/9

Y1 - 2020/9

N2 - In this synthesis paper, the current state of research regarding teaching quality is discussed comparing science education, physical education, and history education, by referring to research on teaching in general. A framework with seven dimensions (Praetorius and Charalambous 2018) was used as a comparison base. This framework contains the dimensions of selecting and introducing the content and subject matter methods, cognitive activation, support of practicing, formative assessment, support of all students’ learning, socio-emotional support, and classroom management. The comparison across subject matters showed that subject-specificity was dependent on the level under consideration: On the dimension level, no adaptations and supplementations were deemed necessary. On the level of sub-dimensions, and especially on the level of observable indicators for these sub-dimensions, this was, however, the case. Challenges for future research are discussed.

AB - In this synthesis paper, the current state of research regarding teaching quality is discussed comparing science education, physical education, and history education, by referring to research on teaching in general. A framework with seven dimensions (Praetorius and Charalambous 2018) was used as a comparison base. This framework contains the dimensions of selecting and introducing the content and subject matter methods, cognitive activation, support of practicing, formative assessment, support of all students’ learning, socio-emotional support, and classroom management. The comparison across subject matters showed that subject-specificity was dependent on the level under consideration: On the dimension level, no adaptations and supplementations were deemed necessary. On the level of sub-dimensions, and especially on the level of observable indicators for these sub-dimensions, this was, however, the case. Challenges for future research are discussed.

KW - History education

KW - Instructional quality

KW - Physical education

KW - Science education

KW - Subject matters

KW - Synthesis

KW - Teaching quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089091211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8

DO - 10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8

M3 - Artikel

VL - 48

SP - 409

EP - 446

JO - Unterrichtswissenschaft

JF - Unterrichtswissenschaft

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)