Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps: The Case of Japan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Stefan Homburg

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-282
Number of pages16
JournalGerman economic review
Volume18
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Abstract

Japan has been in a benign liquidity trap since the 1990s. In a benign liquidity trap, interest rates approach zero and monetary policy is ineffective but output and employment perform decently. Such a pattern contradicts traditional macro theories. This paper introduces a monetary general equilibrium model that is compatible with Japan's performance and resolves puzzles associated with liquidity traps. Possible conclusions for Anglo-Saxon countries and eurozone members are also discussed.

Keywords

    dynamic general equilibrium, forward guidance, interest rate determination, Japan, Liquidity trap, monetary policy, quantitative easing, secular stagnation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps: The Case of Japan. / Homburg, Stefan.
In: German economic review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.08.2017, p. 267-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Homburg S. Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps: The Case of Japan. German economic review. 2017 Aug 1;18(3):267-282. doi: 10.1111/geer.12105
Homburg, Stefan. / Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps : The Case of Japan. In: German economic review. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 267-282.
Download
@article{f7a044dd90954d8e92f8e155b3141bdd,
title = "Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps: The Case of Japan",
abstract = "Japan has been in a benign liquidity trap since the 1990s. In a benign liquidity trap, interest rates approach zero and monetary policy is ineffective but output and employment perform decently. Such a pattern contradicts traditional macro theories. This paper introduces a monetary general equilibrium model that is compatible with Japan's performance and resolves puzzles associated with liquidity traps. Possible conclusions for Anglo-Saxon countries and eurozone members are also discussed.",
keywords = "dynamic general equilibrium, forward guidance, interest rate determination, Japan, Liquidity trap, monetary policy, quantitative easing, secular stagnation",
author = "Stefan Homburg",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/geer.12105",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "267--282",
journal = "German economic review",
issn = "1465-6485",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps

T2 - The Case of Japan

AU - Homburg, Stefan

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Japan has been in a benign liquidity trap since the 1990s. In a benign liquidity trap, interest rates approach zero and monetary policy is ineffective but output and employment perform decently. Such a pattern contradicts traditional macro theories. This paper introduces a monetary general equilibrium model that is compatible with Japan's performance and resolves puzzles associated with liquidity traps. Possible conclusions for Anglo-Saxon countries and eurozone members are also discussed.

AB - Japan has been in a benign liquidity trap since the 1990s. In a benign liquidity trap, interest rates approach zero and monetary policy is ineffective but output and employment perform decently. Such a pattern contradicts traditional macro theories. This paper introduces a monetary general equilibrium model that is compatible with Japan's performance and resolves puzzles associated with liquidity traps. Possible conclusions for Anglo-Saxon countries and eurozone members are also discussed.

KW - dynamic general equilibrium

KW - forward guidance

KW - interest rate determination

KW - Japan

KW - Liquidity trap

KW - monetary policy

KW - quantitative easing

KW - secular stagnation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971299739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/geer.12105

DO - 10.1111/geer.12105

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971299739

VL - 18

SP - 267

EP - 282

JO - German economic review

JF - German economic review

SN - 1465-6485

IS - 3

ER -