Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 829-842 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Ecology |
Volume | 107 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 28 Aug 2018 |
Publication status | Published - 13 Feb 2019 |
Abstract
Correlations among plant traits often reflect important trade-offs or allometric relationships in biological functions like carbon gain, support, water uptake, and reproduction that are associated with different plant organs. Whether trait correlations can be aggregated to “spectra” or “leading dimensions,” whether these dimensions are consistent across plant organs, spatial scale, and growth forms are still open questions. To illustrate the current state of knowledge, we constructed a network of published trait correlations associated with the “leaf economics spectrum,” “biomass allocation dimension,” “seed dimension,” and carbon and nitrogen concentrations. This literature-based network was compared to a network based on a dataset of 23 traits from 2,530 individuals of 126 plant species from 381 plots in Northwest Europe. The observed network comprised more significant correlations than the literature-based network. Network centrality measures showed that size traits such as the mass of leaf, stem, below-ground, and reproductive tissues and plant height were the most central traits in the network, confirming the importance of allometric relationships in herbaceous plants. Stem mass and stem-specific length were “hub” traits correlated with most traits. Environmental selection of hub traits may affect the whole phenotype. In contrast to the literature-based network, SLA and leaf N were of minor importance. Based on cluster analysis and subsequent PCAs of the resulting trait clusters, we found a “size” module, a “seed” module, two modules representing C and N concentrations in plant organs, and a “partitioning” module representing organ mass fractions. A module representing the plant economics spectrum did not emerge. Synthesis. Although we found support for several trait dimensions, the observed trait network deviated significantly from current knowledge, suggesting that previous studies have overlooked trait coordination at the whole-plant level. Furthermore, network analysis suggests that stem traits have a stronger regulatory role in herbaceous plants than leaf traits.
Keywords
- allometry, biomass allocation, leaf economics spectrum, network centrality, plant development and life-history traits, stoichiometry, trait dimensions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Environmental Science(all)
- Ecology
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Plant Science
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Ecology, Vol. 107, No. 2, 13.02.2019, p. 829-842.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Trait correlation network analysis identifies biomass allocation traits and stem specific length as hub traits in herbaceous perennial plants
AU - Kleyer, Michael
AU - Trinogga, Juliane
AU - Cebrian-Piqueras, Miguel Angel
AU - Trenkamp, Anastasia
AU - Fløjgaard, Camilla
AU - Ejrnæs, Rasmus
AU - Bouma, Tjeerd C.
AU - Minden, Vanessa
AU - Maier, Martin
AU - Mantilla-Contreras, Jasmin
AU - Albach, Dirk C.
AU - Blasius, Bernd
N1 - Funding Information: We thank Silke Eilers for contributing to the field work in Denmark, as well as Regine Kayser, Katrin Bahloul, Helga Hots, Natali KD?nitz, Daniela Meißner, and many student assistants for laboratory work. We also thank the Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers for many helpful suggestions to improve earlier drafts of the manuscript. This project was part of the collaborative research project “Sustainable coastal land management: Trade-offs in ecosystem services” (COMTESS), supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant number 01LL0911). English language services provided by stels-ol.de.
PY - 2019/2/13
Y1 - 2019/2/13
N2 - Correlations among plant traits often reflect important trade-offs or allometric relationships in biological functions like carbon gain, support, water uptake, and reproduction that are associated with different plant organs. Whether trait correlations can be aggregated to “spectra” or “leading dimensions,” whether these dimensions are consistent across plant organs, spatial scale, and growth forms are still open questions. To illustrate the current state of knowledge, we constructed a network of published trait correlations associated with the “leaf economics spectrum,” “biomass allocation dimension,” “seed dimension,” and carbon and nitrogen concentrations. This literature-based network was compared to a network based on a dataset of 23 traits from 2,530 individuals of 126 plant species from 381 plots in Northwest Europe. The observed network comprised more significant correlations than the literature-based network. Network centrality measures showed that size traits such as the mass of leaf, stem, below-ground, and reproductive tissues and plant height were the most central traits in the network, confirming the importance of allometric relationships in herbaceous plants. Stem mass and stem-specific length were “hub” traits correlated with most traits. Environmental selection of hub traits may affect the whole phenotype. In contrast to the literature-based network, SLA and leaf N were of minor importance. Based on cluster analysis and subsequent PCAs of the resulting trait clusters, we found a “size” module, a “seed” module, two modules representing C and N concentrations in plant organs, and a “partitioning” module representing organ mass fractions. A module representing the plant economics spectrum did not emerge. Synthesis. Although we found support for several trait dimensions, the observed trait network deviated significantly from current knowledge, suggesting that previous studies have overlooked trait coordination at the whole-plant level. Furthermore, network analysis suggests that stem traits have a stronger regulatory role in herbaceous plants than leaf traits.
AB - Correlations among plant traits often reflect important trade-offs or allometric relationships in biological functions like carbon gain, support, water uptake, and reproduction that are associated with different plant organs. Whether trait correlations can be aggregated to “spectra” or “leading dimensions,” whether these dimensions are consistent across plant organs, spatial scale, and growth forms are still open questions. To illustrate the current state of knowledge, we constructed a network of published trait correlations associated with the “leaf economics spectrum,” “biomass allocation dimension,” “seed dimension,” and carbon and nitrogen concentrations. This literature-based network was compared to a network based on a dataset of 23 traits from 2,530 individuals of 126 plant species from 381 plots in Northwest Europe. The observed network comprised more significant correlations than the literature-based network. Network centrality measures showed that size traits such as the mass of leaf, stem, below-ground, and reproductive tissues and plant height were the most central traits in the network, confirming the importance of allometric relationships in herbaceous plants. Stem mass and stem-specific length were “hub” traits correlated with most traits. Environmental selection of hub traits may affect the whole phenotype. In contrast to the literature-based network, SLA and leaf N were of minor importance. Based on cluster analysis and subsequent PCAs of the resulting trait clusters, we found a “size” module, a “seed” module, two modules representing C and N concentrations in plant organs, and a “partitioning” module representing organ mass fractions. A module representing the plant economics spectrum did not emerge. Synthesis. Although we found support for several trait dimensions, the observed trait network deviated significantly from current knowledge, suggesting that previous studies have overlooked trait coordination at the whole-plant level. Furthermore, network analysis suggests that stem traits have a stronger regulatory role in herbaceous plants than leaf traits.
KW - allometry
KW - biomass allocation
KW - leaf economics spectrum
KW - network centrality
KW - plant development and life-history traits
KW - stoichiometry
KW - trait dimensions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054075745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2745.13066
DO - 10.1111/1365-2745.13066
M3 - Article
VL - 107
SP - 829
EP - 842
JO - Journal of Ecology
JF - Journal of Ecology
SN - 0022-0477
IS - 2
ER -