‘The most Sacred Tenet’? Causal Reasoning in Physics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Mathias Frisch

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-474
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume60
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2009

Cite this

‘The most Sacred Tenet’? Causal Reasoning in Physics. / Frisch, Mathias.
In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 60, 09.2009, p. 459-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{2de757739d1f4dcaac614aedd5f72fec,
title = "{\textquoteleft}The most Sacred Tenet{\textquoteright}? Causal Reasoning in Physics",
author = "Mathias Frisch",
note = "Funding information: I presented ancestors or earlier versions of this paper at the conference {\textquoteleft}Causation and Mechanism{\textquoteright} at the University of Maryland in May 2007, the first conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association in Madrid in 2007, and the Causation Workshop at the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, January 26, 2008. I want to thank the audiences for extremely useful comments and criticisms. I want to thank especially John Norton for his detailed and probing criticisms of different versions of this paper. This project was partially funded by the National Science Foundation, award no. SES-0646677.",
year = "2009",
month = sep,
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "459--474",
journal = "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0007-0882",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘The most Sacred Tenet’? Causal Reasoning in Physics

AU - Frisch, Mathias

N1 - Funding information: I presented ancestors or earlier versions of this paper at the conference ‘Causation and Mechanism’ at the University of Maryland in May 2007, the first conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association in Madrid in 2007, and the Causation Workshop at the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, January 26, 2008. I want to thank the audiences for extremely useful comments and criticisms. I want to thank especially John Norton for his detailed and probing criticisms of different versions of this paper. This project was partially funded by the National Science Foundation, award no. SES-0646677.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 459

EP - 474

JO - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

SN - 0007-0882

ER -