Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23–48 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Spool |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jul 2024 |
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison of different workflows for mobile robotic fabrication using modular building blocks. Different localization, locomotion, and interlocking building systems strategies are tested and compared. The work is influenced by related research into ecosystems of building parts, design software, and builder robots to digitize the construction work. For localization, it compares LIDARs, reacTIVision, and ArUco markers. As a mobile platform, a MIR100 robot platform, a 3.3 m linear axis, and a manual trolly are used. Interlocking components such as wood slates, custom-made bricks, and interlocking wood building blocks are used. The research is in the field of collective robotic construction (CRC) using bespoke robots designed in tandem with specific discrete building blocks.
Keywords
- autonomous construction, collective robotic construction, computer vision, discrete architecture, interlocking parts, Localization, mobile platforms, mobile robots
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Energy(all)
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Social Sciences(all)
- Urban Studies
- Engineering(all)
- Architecture
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Spool, Vol. 11, No. 1, 20.07.2024, p. 23–48.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The migrating walls
T2 - Continuously reconfigurable interlocking modular discrete structures assembled by mobile robots
AU - Sardenberg, Victor
AU - Kondziela, Andrea
AU - Brünner, Antonin
AU - Daadoush, Youssef
AU - Wiese, Hendrik
AU - Becker, Mirco
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024, TU Delft. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/7/20
Y1 - 2024/7/20
N2 - This paper presents a comparison of different workflows for mobile robotic fabrication using modular building blocks. Different localization, locomotion, and interlocking building systems strategies are tested and compared. The work is influenced by related research into ecosystems of building parts, design software, and builder robots to digitize the construction work. For localization, it compares LIDARs, reacTIVision, and ArUco markers. As a mobile platform, a MIR100 robot platform, a 3.3 m linear axis, and a manual trolly are used. Interlocking components such as wood slates, custom-made bricks, and interlocking wood building blocks are used. The research is in the field of collective robotic construction (CRC) using bespoke robots designed in tandem with specific discrete building blocks.
AB - This paper presents a comparison of different workflows for mobile robotic fabrication using modular building blocks. Different localization, locomotion, and interlocking building systems strategies are tested and compared. The work is influenced by related research into ecosystems of building parts, design software, and builder robots to digitize the construction work. For localization, it compares LIDARs, reacTIVision, and ArUco markers. As a mobile platform, a MIR100 robot platform, a 3.3 m linear axis, and a manual trolly are used. Interlocking components such as wood slates, custom-made bricks, and interlocking wood building blocks are used. The research is in the field of collective robotic construction (CRC) using bespoke robots designed in tandem with specific discrete building blocks.
KW - autonomous construction
KW - collective robotic construction
KW - computer vision
KW - discrete architecture
KW - interlocking parts
KW - Localization
KW - mobile platforms
KW - mobile robots
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203308658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.47982/spool.2024.1.02
DO - 10.47982/spool.2024.1.02
M3 - Article
VL - 11
SP - 23
EP - 48
JO - Spool
JF - Spool
SN - 2215-0897
IS - 1
ER -