The Meant, the Said, and the Understood: Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
  • Paderborn University
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Number of pages5
ISBN (print)9781450389983
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes
Event3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021 - Virtual, Online, Spain
Duration: 27 Jul 202129 Jul 2021

Abstract

Many questions of public interest do not have a single answer but come with a set of choices, each of which with its pros and cons. An "objective"information system can help explore the underlying argument space, and, if equipped with a conversational interface, it can create the experience of lively discussions resembling those from our daily lives. However, users will (subconsciously) extend the provided information by assumptions that adhere to their cognitive biases. In this regard, note that biases do not arise only from the underlying data or the employed algorithms, but also from the way the information is presented - especially in audio-only channels. Our paper brings attention to bias-related challenges of conversational interfaces for argument search systems. We identify research questions that address these challenges, and we propose ideas and methods to tackle them.

Keywords

    argument search, cognitive bias, conversational search, intelligent assistants, selection bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

The Meant, the Said, and the Understood: Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases. / Kiesel, Johannes; Spina, Damiano; Wachsmuth, Henning et al.
Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2021. 20.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Kiesel, J, Spina, D, Wachsmuth, H & Stein, B 2021, The Meant, the Said, and the Understood: Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases. in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021., 20, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021, Virtual, Online, Spain, 27 Jul 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469595.3469615
Kiesel, J., Spina, D., Wachsmuth, H., & Stein, B. (2021). The Meant, the Said, and the Understood: Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021 Article 20 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3469595.3469615
Kiesel J, Spina D, Wachsmuth H, Stein B. The Meant, the Said, and the Understood: Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2021. 20 doi: 10.1145/3469595.3469615
Kiesel, Johannes ; Spina, Damiano ; Wachsmuth, Henning et al. / The Meant, the Said, and the Understood : Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2021.
Download
@inproceedings{77899f5967f449c19903d7c5483ebaf1,
title = "The Meant, the Said, and the Understood: Conversational Argument Search and Cognitive Biases",
abstract = "Many questions of public interest do not have a single answer but come with a set of choices, each of which with its pros and cons. An {"}objective{"}information system can help explore the underlying argument space, and, if equipped with a conversational interface, it can create the experience of lively discussions resembling those from our daily lives. However, users will (subconsciously) extend the provided information by assumptions that adhere to their cognitive biases. In this regard, note that biases do not arise only from the underlying data or the employed algorithms, but also from the way the information is presented - especially in audio-only channels. Our paper brings attention to bias-related challenges of conversational interfaces for argument search systems. We identify research questions that address these challenges, and we propose ideas and methods to tackle them.",
keywords = "argument search, cognitive bias, conversational search, intelligent assistants, selection bias",
author = "Johannes Kiesel and Damiano Spina and Henning Wachsmuth and Benno Stein",
note = "Funding Information: Damiano Spina is the recipient of an Australian Research Council DECRA Research Fellowship (DE200100064).; 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021 ; Conference date: 27-07-2021 Through 29-07-2021",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1145/3469595.3469615",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450389983",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
address = "United States",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - The Meant, the Said, and the Understood

T2 - 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021

AU - Kiesel, Johannes

AU - Spina, Damiano

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Stein, Benno

N1 - Funding Information: Damiano Spina is the recipient of an Australian Research Council DECRA Research Fellowship (DE200100064).

PY - 2021/7/27

Y1 - 2021/7/27

N2 - Many questions of public interest do not have a single answer but come with a set of choices, each of which with its pros and cons. An "objective"information system can help explore the underlying argument space, and, if equipped with a conversational interface, it can create the experience of lively discussions resembling those from our daily lives. However, users will (subconsciously) extend the provided information by assumptions that adhere to their cognitive biases. In this regard, note that biases do not arise only from the underlying data or the employed algorithms, but also from the way the information is presented - especially in audio-only channels. Our paper brings attention to bias-related challenges of conversational interfaces for argument search systems. We identify research questions that address these challenges, and we propose ideas and methods to tackle them.

AB - Many questions of public interest do not have a single answer but come with a set of choices, each of which with its pros and cons. An "objective"information system can help explore the underlying argument space, and, if equipped with a conversational interface, it can create the experience of lively discussions resembling those from our daily lives. However, users will (subconsciously) extend the provided information by assumptions that adhere to their cognitive biases. In this regard, note that biases do not arise only from the underlying data or the employed algorithms, but also from the way the information is presented - especially in audio-only channels. Our paper brings attention to bias-related challenges of conversational interfaces for argument search systems. We identify research questions that address these challenges, and we propose ideas and methods to tackle them.

KW - argument search

KW - cognitive bias

KW - conversational search

KW - intelligent assistants

KW - selection bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112313824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3469595.3469615

DO - 10.1145/3469595.3469615

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85112313824

SN - 9781450389983

BT - Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, CUI 2021

PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Y2 - 27 July 2021 through 29 July 2021

ER -

By the same author(s)