TY - JOUR

T1 - The interaction of climate and trade policy

AU - Pothen, Frank

AU - Hübler, Michael

N1 - Funding Information: We thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments as well as Jeroen K. Vermunt, Olaf Hübler, Christoph Böhringer, Sjak Smulders, Carolyn Fischer, Susan Steiner, Ulrike Grote and participants of the 2017 EAERE conference in Athens, the 2017 EcoMod conference in Ljubljana, the 6 th Mannheim Energy Conference and presentations at the University of Oldenburg and Maastricht University. We gratefully acknowledge funding for the project “NEDS – Nachhaltige Energieversorgung Niedersachsen” supported by the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture and the Volkswagen Foundation through the “Niedersächsisches Vorab” grant programme (grant ZN3043).

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - This article studies climate policies and trade policies focusing on their interactions. It presents an applied general equilibrium model which combines the theoretical foundations of an Eaton–Kortum (EK) model of international trade with the comprehensiveness of a global multi-region, multi-sector Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model of production and consumption. The EK model features endogenous Ricardian productivity gains and non-tariff trade costs. Countries and sectors can be disaggregated, e.g. representing federal states and technology-specific power generation. The model calibration introduces a log-multiplicative structural estimation approach based on a gravity model with market clearing conditions to simultaneously estimate the EK model's trade elasticity, productivities and iceberg trade costs at the subnational sectoral level. Based on these estimates, policy simulations are carried out, in which the effect of climate and trade policy on CO2 emissions is decomposed into a scale, composition, technique and substitution effect. The policy simulations suggest that the removal of tariffs creates smaller welfare gains than a comparable reduction of non-tariff barriers but also a slightly smaller increase in European and global CO2 emissions, mainly via substitution and composition effects. The effects significantly differ between national and subnational model regions. Lower trade costs reduce the negative welfare effects of the European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) for some of its members by lowering emissions. EU renewable energy support slightly reduces European and global emissions but also welfare compared to the EU ETS alone.

AB - This article studies climate policies and trade policies focusing on their interactions. It presents an applied general equilibrium model which combines the theoretical foundations of an Eaton–Kortum (EK) model of international trade with the comprehensiveness of a global multi-region, multi-sector Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model of production and consumption. The EK model features endogenous Ricardian productivity gains and non-tariff trade costs. Countries and sectors can be disaggregated, e.g. representing federal states and technology-specific power generation. The model calibration introduces a log-multiplicative structural estimation approach based on a gravity model with market clearing conditions to simultaneously estimate the EK model's trade elasticity, productivities and iceberg trade costs at the subnational sectoral level. Based on these estimates, policy simulations are carried out, in which the effect of climate and trade policy on CO2 emissions is decomposed into a scale, composition, technique and substitution effect. The policy simulations suggest that the removal of tariffs creates smaller welfare gains than a comparable reduction of non-tariff barriers but also a slightly smaller increase in European and global CO2 emissions, mainly via substitution and composition effects. The effects significantly differ between national and subnational model regions. Lower trade costs reduce the negative welfare effects of the European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) for some of its members by lowering emissions. EU renewable energy support slightly reduces European and global emissions but also welfare compared to the EU ETS alone.

KW - CETA

KW - CGE

KW - Climate policy

KW - International trade

KW - Regional model

KW - Renewable energy

KW - TTIP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048485868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.04.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048485868

VL - 107

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - European economic review

JF - European economic review

SN - 0014-2921

ER -