Techno-economic and Environmental Comparison of Internal Combustion Engines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Ship Applications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number230328
JournalJournal of power sources
Volume508
Early online date10 Aug 2021
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2021

Abstract

In order to quantify the economic and environmental impact of technology selection in ship power systems, four different battery-supported hybrid configurations including diesel and gas combustion engines, as well as natural gas fueled solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are modeled and analyzed. The investigations include component investments, maintenance and operational costs, as well as the components’ and fuels’ carbon footprints, operational greenhouse gases and other relevant emissions. Dynamic energy system models are used to derive economically optimal system designs for an appropriate technology comparison in a cruise ship case study. The assessment is conducted for a cruise ship case study with technology parameters for the near future and 2050. Results indicate that the auxiliary power system based on diesel combustion is inferior both economically and environmentally compared to SOFCs or gas combustion engines. While latter are the most cost efficient, SOFC application provides an environmental improvement without the need for a new fuel such as hydrogen. In a final outlook for the year 2050, SOFCs economically overtake gas combustion engines on the condition that their investment costs decrease and synthetic fuels are introduced to the market as a low emission solution.

Keywords

    Decarbonization of the shipping sector, Energy system design optimization, Environmental assessment, Ship energy systems, Solid oxide fuel cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Techno-economic and Environmental Comparison of Internal Combustion Engines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Ship Applications. / Kistner, Lukas; Schubert, Fritjof L.; Minke, Christine et al.
In: Journal of power sources, Vol. 508, 230328, 01.10.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Kistner L, Schubert FL, Minke C, Bensmann A, Hanke-Rauschenbach R. Techno-economic and Environmental Comparison of Internal Combustion Engines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Ship Applications. Journal of power sources. 2021 Oct 1;508:230328. Epub 2021 Aug 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230328
Download
@article{905a6119ffbf4f64b4a9334a4a781383,
title = "Techno-economic and Environmental Comparison of Internal Combustion Engines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Ship Applications",
abstract = "In order to quantify the economic and environmental impact of technology selection in ship power systems, four different battery-supported hybrid configurations including diesel and gas combustion engines, as well as natural gas fueled solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are modeled and analyzed. The investigations include component investments, maintenance and operational costs, as well as the components{\textquoteright} and fuels{\textquoteright} carbon footprints, operational greenhouse gases and other relevant emissions. Dynamic energy system models are used to derive economically optimal system designs for an appropriate technology comparison in a cruise ship case study. The assessment is conducted for a cruise ship case study with technology parameters for the near future and 2050. Results indicate that the auxiliary power system based on diesel combustion is inferior both economically and environmentally compared to SOFCs or gas combustion engines. While latter are the most cost efficient, SOFC application provides an environmental improvement without the need for a new fuel such as hydrogen. In a final outlook for the year 2050, SOFCs economically overtake gas combustion engines on the condition that their investment costs decrease and synthetic fuels are introduced to the market as a low emission solution.",
keywords = "Decarbonization of the shipping sector, Energy system design optimization, Environmental assessment, Ship energy systems, Solid oxide fuel cells",
author = "Lukas Kistner and Schubert, {Fritjof L.} and Christine Minke and Astrid Bensmann and Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach",
note = "Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure, Germany (BMVI, funding code 03B10605H ) and the coordination of the “MultiSchIBZ” project by the National Organisation Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology (NOW GmbH), Germany .",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230328",
language = "English",
volume = "508",
journal = "Journal of power sources",
issn = "0378-7753",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Techno-economic and Environmental Comparison of Internal Combustion Engines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Ship Applications

AU - Kistner, Lukas

AU - Schubert, Fritjof L.

AU - Minke, Christine

AU - Bensmann, Astrid

AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard

N1 - Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure, Germany (BMVI, funding code 03B10605H ) and the coordination of the “MultiSchIBZ” project by the National Organisation Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology (NOW GmbH), Germany .

PY - 2021/10/1

Y1 - 2021/10/1

N2 - In order to quantify the economic and environmental impact of technology selection in ship power systems, four different battery-supported hybrid configurations including diesel and gas combustion engines, as well as natural gas fueled solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are modeled and analyzed. The investigations include component investments, maintenance and operational costs, as well as the components’ and fuels’ carbon footprints, operational greenhouse gases and other relevant emissions. Dynamic energy system models are used to derive economically optimal system designs for an appropriate technology comparison in a cruise ship case study. The assessment is conducted for a cruise ship case study with technology parameters for the near future and 2050. Results indicate that the auxiliary power system based on diesel combustion is inferior both economically and environmentally compared to SOFCs or gas combustion engines. While latter are the most cost efficient, SOFC application provides an environmental improvement without the need for a new fuel such as hydrogen. In a final outlook for the year 2050, SOFCs economically overtake gas combustion engines on the condition that their investment costs decrease and synthetic fuels are introduced to the market as a low emission solution.

AB - In order to quantify the economic and environmental impact of technology selection in ship power systems, four different battery-supported hybrid configurations including diesel and gas combustion engines, as well as natural gas fueled solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are modeled and analyzed. The investigations include component investments, maintenance and operational costs, as well as the components’ and fuels’ carbon footprints, operational greenhouse gases and other relevant emissions. Dynamic energy system models are used to derive economically optimal system designs for an appropriate technology comparison in a cruise ship case study. The assessment is conducted for a cruise ship case study with technology parameters for the near future and 2050. Results indicate that the auxiliary power system based on diesel combustion is inferior both economically and environmentally compared to SOFCs or gas combustion engines. While latter are the most cost efficient, SOFC application provides an environmental improvement without the need for a new fuel such as hydrogen. In a final outlook for the year 2050, SOFCs economically overtake gas combustion engines on the condition that their investment costs decrease and synthetic fuels are introduced to the market as a low emission solution.

KW - Decarbonization of the shipping sector

KW - Energy system design optimization

KW - Environmental assessment

KW - Ship energy systems

KW - Solid oxide fuel cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111965585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230328

DO - 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230328

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85111965585

VL - 508

JO - Journal of power sources

JF - Journal of power sources

SN - 0378-7753

M1 - 230328

ER -

By the same author(s)