Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics |
Volume | 80 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 4 Dec 2017 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.
Keywords
- Attention, Eye Movements: *Other, Gaze
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities(all)
- Language and Linguistics
- Psychology(all)
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience(all)
- Sensory Systems
- Social Sciences(all)
- Linguistics and Language
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 80, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 1-6.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture
AU - van der Wel, Robrecht P.
AU - Welsh, Timothy
AU - Böckler, Anne
N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by an Early Research Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Merryn Constable for her contribution to the data analysis. Funding Information: Acknowledgements This research was supported by an Early Research Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Merryn Constable for her contribution to the data analysis.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.
AB - The direction of gaze towards or away from an observer has immediate effects on attentional processing in the observer. Previous research indicates that faces with direct gaze are processed more efficiently than faces with averted gaze. We recently reported additional processing advantages for faces that suddenly adopt direct gaze (abruptly shift from averted to direct gaze) relative to static direct gaze (always in direct gaze), sudden averted gaze (abruptly shift from direct to averted gaze), and static averted gaze (always in averted gaze). Because changes in gaze orientation in previous study co-occurred with changes in head orientation, it was not clear if the effect is contingent on face or eye processing, or whether it requires both the eyes and the face to provide consistent information. The present study delineates the impact of head orientation, sudden onset motion cues, and gaze cues. Participants completed a target-detection task in which head position remained in a static averted or direct orientation while sudden onset motion and eye gaze cues were manipulated within each trial. The results indicate a sudden direct gaze advantage that resulted from the additive role of motion and gaze cues. Interestingly, the orientation of the face towards or away from the observer did not influence the sudden direct gaze effect, suggesting that eye gaze cues, not face orientation cues, are critical for the sudden direct gaze effect.
KW - Attention
KW - Eye Movements: Other
KW - Gaze
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036528043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y
DO - 10.3758/s13414-017-1462-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 29204867
AN - SCOPUS:85036528043
VL - 80
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
SN - 1943-3921
IS - 1
ER -