Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 4517-4542 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Advances in space research |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 10 |
Early online date | 16 Sept 2024 |
Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
The density of the upper atmosphere can be determined by orbit and accelerometer data from low Earth orbit satellites as insitu measurements along the orbit. One main challenge therein is the estimation of physical accelerometer calibration parameters, meaning that these parameters should not absorb other effects and model deficiencies in the Precise Orbit Determination (POD) process. The accelerometers of all geodetic satellites like GRACE and GRACE-FO are affected by time dependent bias and scale factors. Therefore a calibration of the data is indispensable. A dynamic POD based physical accelerometer calibration is developed for the complete GRACE and GRACE-FO missions. We investigate different parametrization strategies and utilize different observation data, as the accurate inter-satellite ranging additionally to GPS orbit data. For the estimation parameters we distinguish between offset and scale, furthermore, cross-track and radial directions are significantly less sensitive than along-track and require a different evaluation. For the offset, constant and time dependent parameters are investigated. Furthermore, a continuous offset calibration over arc boundaries is implemented and tested. The sensitivity of the scale factor is lower, although, in contrast to the offset, it increases with higher total accelerations. This means that it needs to be estimated over longer time periods. We investigate periods between three hours and one month as well as results from Gravity Field Recovery (GFR). Monthly scale factors give valuable results, at least for x-axis and when the Solar activity is not very low. Nevertheless, we also estimate weighted constant scale factors from the monthly results and use these in a subsequent POD, giving more realistic offset results for most periods and cross-track and radial directions. From the used background models in the POD, Earth's gravitational model has a noticeable influence on the estimated calibration parameters, especially the scale factors. We utilized several different models. Results with monthly ITSG solutions are distinctly better than the ones with the time dependent GOCO06s model. We show that the validation with usual metrics, like post-fit POD residuals, is not able to reflect the quality of the different estimated calibration parameters. For a quantitative validation we introduce an approach based on the modeled non-gravitational accelerations. Therefore, the uncertainty of the models is evaluated first. The influence of main error sources in the models is assessed and propagated to the results. We compare our scale parameters to available references and the complete calibration to TU Delft's latest results. Finally we show the effect of different calibration options on the retrieved density. The estimated calibration parameters and non-gravitational accelerations for the whole GRACE and GRACE-FO missions are available on our data server www.zarm.uni-bremen.de/zarm_daten.
Keywords
- Accelerometer, GRACE/-FO, Non-gravitational forces, Precise Orbit Determination (POD), Thermospheric density
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Aerospace Engineering
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geophysics
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Atmospheric Science
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Space and Planetary Science
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Advances in space research, Vol. 74, No. 10, 15.11.2024, p. 4517-4542.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Tailored accelerometer calibration by POD for thermospheric density retrieval with GRACE and GRACE-FO
AU - Wöske, Florian
AU - Huckfeldt, Moritz
AU - Rievers, Benny
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 COSPAR
PY - 2024/11/15
Y1 - 2024/11/15
N2 - The density of the upper atmosphere can be determined by orbit and accelerometer data from low Earth orbit satellites as insitu measurements along the orbit. One main challenge therein is the estimation of physical accelerometer calibration parameters, meaning that these parameters should not absorb other effects and model deficiencies in the Precise Orbit Determination (POD) process. The accelerometers of all geodetic satellites like GRACE and GRACE-FO are affected by time dependent bias and scale factors. Therefore a calibration of the data is indispensable. A dynamic POD based physical accelerometer calibration is developed for the complete GRACE and GRACE-FO missions. We investigate different parametrization strategies and utilize different observation data, as the accurate inter-satellite ranging additionally to GPS orbit data. For the estimation parameters we distinguish between offset and scale, furthermore, cross-track and radial directions are significantly less sensitive than along-track and require a different evaluation. For the offset, constant and time dependent parameters are investigated. Furthermore, a continuous offset calibration over arc boundaries is implemented and tested. The sensitivity of the scale factor is lower, although, in contrast to the offset, it increases with higher total accelerations. This means that it needs to be estimated over longer time periods. We investigate periods between three hours and one month as well as results from Gravity Field Recovery (GFR). Monthly scale factors give valuable results, at least for x-axis and when the Solar activity is not very low. Nevertheless, we also estimate weighted constant scale factors from the monthly results and use these in a subsequent POD, giving more realistic offset results for most periods and cross-track and radial directions. From the used background models in the POD, Earth's gravitational model has a noticeable influence on the estimated calibration parameters, especially the scale factors. We utilized several different models. Results with monthly ITSG solutions are distinctly better than the ones with the time dependent GOCO06s model. We show that the validation with usual metrics, like post-fit POD residuals, is not able to reflect the quality of the different estimated calibration parameters. For a quantitative validation we introduce an approach based on the modeled non-gravitational accelerations. Therefore, the uncertainty of the models is evaluated first. The influence of main error sources in the models is assessed and propagated to the results. We compare our scale parameters to available references and the complete calibration to TU Delft's latest results. Finally we show the effect of different calibration options on the retrieved density. The estimated calibration parameters and non-gravitational accelerations for the whole GRACE and GRACE-FO missions are available on our data server www.zarm.uni-bremen.de/zarm_daten.
AB - The density of the upper atmosphere can be determined by orbit and accelerometer data from low Earth orbit satellites as insitu measurements along the orbit. One main challenge therein is the estimation of physical accelerometer calibration parameters, meaning that these parameters should not absorb other effects and model deficiencies in the Precise Orbit Determination (POD) process. The accelerometers of all geodetic satellites like GRACE and GRACE-FO are affected by time dependent bias and scale factors. Therefore a calibration of the data is indispensable. A dynamic POD based physical accelerometer calibration is developed for the complete GRACE and GRACE-FO missions. We investigate different parametrization strategies and utilize different observation data, as the accurate inter-satellite ranging additionally to GPS orbit data. For the estimation parameters we distinguish between offset and scale, furthermore, cross-track and radial directions are significantly less sensitive than along-track and require a different evaluation. For the offset, constant and time dependent parameters are investigated. Furthermore, a continuous offset calibration over arc boundaries is implemented and tested. The sensitivity of the scale factor is lower, although, in contrast to the offset, it increases with higher total accelerations. This means that it needs to be estimated over longer time periods. We investigate periods between three hours and one month as well as results from Gravity Field Recovery (GFR). Monthly scale factors give valuable results, at least for x-axis and when the Solar activity is not very low. Nevertheless, we also estimate weighted constant scale factors from the monthly results and use these in a subsequent POD, giving more realistic offset results for most periods and cross-track and radial directions. From the used background models in the POD, Earth's gravitational model has a noticeable influence on the estimated calibration parameters, especially the scale factors. We utilized several different models. Results with monthly ITSG solutions are distinctly better than the ones with the time dependent GOCO06s model. We show that the validation with usual metrics, like post-fit POD residuals, is not able to reflect the quality of the different estimated calibration parameters. For a quantitative validation we introduce an approach based on the modeled non-gravitational accelerations. Therefore, the uncertainty of the models is evaluated first. The influence of main error sources in the models is assessed and propagated to the results. We compare our scale parameters to available references and the complete calibration to TU Delft's latest results. Finally we show the effect of different calibration options on the retrieved density. The estimated calibration parameters and non-gravitational accelerations for the whole GRACE and GRACE-FO missions are available on our data server www.zarm.uni-bremen.de/zarm_daten.
KW - Accelerometer
KW - GRACE/-FO
KW - Non-gravitational forces
KW - Precise Orbit Determination (POD)
KW - Thermospheric density
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204398339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.021
DO - 10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204398339
VL - 74
SP - 4517
EP - 4542
JO - Advances in space research
JF - Advances in space research
SN - 0273-1177
IS - 10
ER -