Students' awareness and conceptions of science-related communication mechanisms on social media

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Andreas Nehring
  • Soraya Kresin
  • Kerstin Hildegard Kremer
  • Alexander Georg Büssing

External Research Organisations

  • Technische Universität Braunschweig
  • Justus Liebig University Giessen
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Early online date29 Jul 2024
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Jul 2024

Abstract

The rise of social media platforms and subsequent lack of traditional gatekeeping mechanisms have enabled the proliferation of scientific disinformation. Users attempting to properly evaluate scientific information and disinformation are immensely obstructed by media communication mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers. Given the recent approaches to reconceptualizing the nature of science represented by facets of media communication mechanisms, we report results from seven focus groups of 26 tenth-grade students (M = 15 years; 58% female, 38% male, 4% nonbinary) investigating such mechanisms as applied to climate change content on social media. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified the students' awareness and conceptions of mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers on a continuum between rather simple and elaborate. The findings suggest that the students have a general awareness of most mechanisms based on their own experiences and describe additional media communication mechanisms, such as bots, microtargeting, and, particularly, algorithms, which appear specifically relevant in dealing with scientific disinformation on social media. Based on the results, we derive a set of needs for science educational learning materials and science media literacy to prepare students to tackle scientific disinformation on social media.

Keywords

    nature of science, misinformation, scientific information, students' conceptions, social media, media communication mechanisms, science media literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Students' awareness and conceptions of science-related communication mechanisms on social media. / Nehring, Andreas; Kresin, Soraya; Kremer, Kerstin Hildegard et al.
In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29.07.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{046a4eb03e65420dba67b814138b4600,
title = "Students' awareness and conceptions of science-related communication mechanisms on social media",
abstract = "The rise of social media platforms and subsequent lack of traditional gatekeeping mechanisms have enabled the proliferation of scientific disinformation. Users attempting to properly evaluate scientific information and disinformation are immensely obstructed by media communication mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers. Given the recent approaches to reconceptualizing the nature of science represented by facets of media communication mechanisms, we report results from seven focus groups of 26 tenth-grade students (M = 15 years; 58% female, 38% male, 4% nonbinary) investigating such mechanisms as applied to climate change content on social media. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified the students' awareness and conceptions of mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers on a continuum between rather simple and elaborate. The findings suggest that the students have a general awareness of most mechanisms based on their own experiences and describe additional media communication mechanisms, such as bots, microtargeting, and, particularly, algorithms, which appear specifically relevant in dealing with scientific disinformation on social media. Based on the results, we derive a set of needs for science educational learning materials and science media literacy to prepare students to tackle scientific disinformation on social media.",
keywords = "nature of science, misinformation, scientific information, students' conceptions, social media, media communication mechanisms, science media literacy",
author = "Andreas Nehring and Soraya Kresin and Kremer, {Kerstin Hildegard} and B{\"u}ssing, {Alexander Georg}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Research in Science Teaching published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Association for Research in Science Teaching.",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1002/tea.21973",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Research in Science Teaching",
issn = "0022-4308",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Students' awareness and conceptions of science-related communication mechanisms on social media

AU - Nehring, Andreas

AU - Kresin, Soraya

AU - Kremer, Kerstin Hildegard

AU - Büssing, Alexander Georg

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Research in Science Teaching published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

PY - 2024/7/29

Y1 - 2024/7/29

N2 - The rise of social media platforms and subsequent lack of traditional gatekeeping mechanisms have enabled the proliferation of scientific disinformation. Users attempting to properly evaluate scientific information and disinformation are immensely obstructed by media communication mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers. Given the recent approaches to reconceptualizing the nature of science represented by facets of media communication mechanisms, we report results from seven focus groups of 26 tenth-grade students (M = 15 years; 58% female, 38% male, 4% nonbinary) investigating such mechanisms as applied to climate change content on social media. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified the students' awareness and conceptions of mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers on a continuum between rather simple and elaborate. The findings suggest that the students have a general awareness of most mechanisms based on their own experiences and describe additional media communication mechanisms, such as bots, microtargeting, and, particularly, algorithms, which appear specifically relevant in dealing with scientific disinformation on social media. Based on the results, we derive a set of needs for science educational learning materials and science media literacy to prepare students to tackle scientific disinformation on social media.

AB - The rise of social media platforms and subsequent lack of traditional gatekeeping mechanisms have enabled the proliferation of scientific disinformation. Users attempting to properly evaluate scientific information and disinformation are immensely obstructed by media communication mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers. Given the recent approaches to reconceptualizing the nature of science represented by facets of media communication mechanisms, we report results from seven focus groups of 26 tenth-grade students (M = 15 years; 58% female, 38% male, 4% nonbinary) investigating such mechanisms as applied to climate change content on social media. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified the students' awareness and conceptions of mechanisms such as filter bubbles and echo chambers on a continuum between rather simple and elaborate. The findings suggest that the students have a general awareness of most mechanisms based on their own experiences and describe additional media communication mechanisms, such as bots, microtargeting, and, particularly, algorithms, which appear specifically relevant in dealing with scientific disinformation on social media. Based on the results, we derive a set of needs for science educational learning materials and science media literacy to prepare students to tackle scientific disinformation on social media.

KW - nature of science

KW - misinformation

KW - scientific information

KW - students' conceptions

KW - social media

KW - media communication mechanisms

KW - science media literacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199985508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/tea.21973

DO - 10.1002/tea.21973

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

JF - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

SN - 0022-4308

ER -

By the same author(s)