Structurally coupled cooperative inversion of magnetic resonance with resistivity soundings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics (LIAG)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)JM51-JM63
JournalGEOPHYSICS
Volume83
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Hydrologic parameters, such as porosity, salinity, and hydraulic conductivity are keys for understanding the subsurface. Hydrogeophysical investigations can lead to ambiguous results, particularly in the presence of clay and saltwater. A combination of magnetic resonance sounding and vertical electrical sounding is known to provide insight into these properties. Structural coupling increases the model resolution and reduces the ambiguity for both methods. Inversion schemes using block models exist, but they have trouble resolving smooth or complex parameter distributions. We have developed a structurally coupled cooperative inversion (SCCI) that works with smooth parameter distributions and is able to introduce blocky features through the exchange of structural information. The coupling adapts the smoothness constraint locally in connection to the model roughness to allow for sharper model boundaries. We investigate the performance of the SCCI using blocky and smooth synthetic models that depend on two controlling coupling parameters. A well-known field case is used to verify the results with drilling core and well logs. Varying the coupling parameters results in equivalent models covering the bandwidth from smooth to blocky, while providing a similar data fit. The SCCI results are more consistent with the synthetic models. Structural coupling improves the resolution of the single methods and can be used to describe hydrogeophysical targets in more detail and less ambiguously.

Keywords

    Algorithm, Electrical/resistivity, Inversion, Surface nuclear magnetic resonance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Structurally coupled cooperative inversion of magnetic resonance with resistivity soundings. / Skibbe, Nico; Günther, Thomas; Müller-Petke, Mike.
In: GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 83, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. JM51-JM63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Skibbe N, Günther T, Müller-Petke M. Structurally coupled cooperative inversion of magnetic resonance with resistivity soundings. GEOPHYSICS. 2018 Nov 1;83(6):JM51-JM63. doi: 10.1190/geo2018-0046.1
Download
@article{592da94d7ab04e528bb32809c9e26668,
title = "Structurally coupled cooperative inversion of magnetic resonance with resistivity soundings",
abstract = "Hydrologic parameters, such as porosity, salinity, and hydraulic conductivity are keys for understanding the subsurface. Hydrogeophysical investigations can lead to ambiguous results, particularly in the presence of clay and saltwater. A combination of magnetic resonance sounding and vertical electrical sounding is known to provide insight into these properties. Structural coupling increases the model resolution and reduces the ambiguity for both methods. Inversion schemes using block models exist, but they have trouble resolving smooth or complex parameter distributions. We have developed a structurally coupled cooperative inversion (SCCI) that works with smooth parameter distributions and is able to introduce blocky features through the exchange of structural information. The coupling adapts the smoothness constraint locally in connection to the model roughness to allow for sharper model boundaries. We investigate the performance of the SCCI using blocky and smooth synthetic models that depend on two controlling coupling parameters. A well-known field case is used to verify the results with drilling core and well logs. Varying the coupling parameters results in equivalent models covering the bandwidth from smooth to blocky, while providing a similar data fit. The SCCI results are more consistent with the synthetic models. Structural coupling improves the resolution of the single methods and can be used to describe hydrogeophysical targets in more detail and less ambiguously.",
keywords = "Algorithm, Electrical/resistivity, Inversion, Surface nuclear magnetic resonance",
author = "Nico Skibbe and Thomas G{\"u}nther and Mike M{\"u}ller-Petke",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Authors.",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1190/geo2018-0046.1",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "JM51--JM63",
journal = "GEOPHYSICS",
issn = "0016-8033",
publisher = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structurally coupled cooperative inversion of magnetic resonance with resistivity soundings

AU - Skibbe, Nico

AU - Günther, Thomas

AU - Müller-Petke, Mike

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Authors.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Hydrologic parameters, such as porosity, salinity, and hydraulic conductivity are keys for understanding the subsurface. Hydrogeophysical investigations can lead to ambiguous results, particularly in the presence of clay and saltwater. A combination of magnetic resonance sounding and vertical electrical sounding is known to provide insight into these properties. Structural coupling increases the model resolution and reduces the ambiguity for both methods. Inversion schemes using block models exist, but they have trouble resolving smooth or complex parameter distributions. We have developed a structurally coupled cooperative inversion (SCCI) that works with smooth parameter distributions and is able to introduce blocky features through the exchange of structural information. The coupling adapts the smoothness constraint locally in connection to the model roughness to allow for sharper model boundaries. We investigate the performance of the SCCI using blocky and smooth synthetic models that depend on two controlling coupling parameters. A well-known field case is used to verify the results with drilling core and well logs. Varying the coupling parameters results in equivalent models covering the bandwidth from smooth to blocky, while providing a similar data fit. The SCCI results are more consistent with the synthetic models. Structural coupling improves the resolution of the single methods and can be used to describe hydrogeophysical targets in more detail and less ambiguously.

AB - Hydrologic parameters, such as porosity, salinity, and hydraulic conductivity are keys for understanding the subsurface. Hydrogeophysical investigations can lead to ambiguous results, particularly in the presence of clay and saltwater. A combination of magnetic resonance sounding and vertical electrical sounding is known to provide insight into these properties. Structural coupling increases the model resolution and reduces the ambiguity for both methods. Inversion schemes using block models exist, but they have trouble resolving smooth or complex parameter distributions. We have developed a structurally coupled cooperative inversion (SCCI) that works with smooth parameter distributions and is able to introduce blocky features through the exchange of structural information. The coupling adapts the smoothness constraint locally in connection to the model roughness to allow for sharper model boundaries. We investigate the performance of the SCCI using blocky and smooth synthetic models that depend on two controlling coupling parameters. A well-known field case is used to verify the results with drilling core and well logs. Varying the coupling parameters results in equivalent models covering the bandwidth from smooth to blocky, while providing a similar data fit. The SCCI results are more consistent with the synthetic models. Structural coupling improves the resolution of the single methods and can be used to describe hydrogeophysical targets in more detail and less ambiguously.

KW - Algorithm

KW - Electrical/resistivity

KW - Inversion

KW - Surface nuclear magnetic resonance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054708537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1190/geo2018-0046.1

DO - 10.1190/geo2018-0046.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054708537

VL - 83

SP - JM51-JM63

JO - GEOPHYSICS

JF - GEOPHYSICS

SN - 0016-8033

IS - 6

ER -

By the same author(s)