Statistics of interlaboratory in vitro toxicological studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Ludwig A. Hothorn

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-63
Number of pages21
JournalAlternatives to laboratory animals
Volume31
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003

Abstract

Interlaboratory studies are common in toxicology, particularly for the introduction of alternative assays. Numerous papers are available on the statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies, but these deal primarily with the case of a replicated single sample studied in several laboratories: This approach can be used for some assays, but for the majority, the results will be unsatisfactory, i.e. involving great variability between both the dose groups and the laboratories. However, the primary objective of toxicological assays is to achieve similarity between the sizes of effects, rather than to determine absolute values. In the parametric model, the sizes of effects are the studentised differences from the negative control or, for the commonly used dose-response designs, the similarity of the slopes of the dose-response curves. Standard approaches for the estimation of intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability, including Mandel plots, are introduced, and new approaches are presented for demonstrating similarity of effect sizes, with or without assuming a dose-response model. One approach is based on a modification of the parallel-line assay, the other is based on a modification of the interaction contrasts of the analysis of variance. SAS programs are given for all approaches, and real data from an interlaboratory immunotoxicological study are analysed as a demonstration.

Keywords

    Alternatives, In vitro assays, Interaction contrasts, Interlaboratory study, Meta-analysis, Parallel line assay, Statistics, Trend tests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Statistics of interlaboratory in vitro toxicological studies. / Hothorn, Ludwig A.
In: Alternatives to laboratory animals, Vol. 31, No. SUPPL. 1, 11.2003, p. 43-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Hothorn LA. Statistics of interlaboratory in vitro toxicological studies. Alternatives to laboratory animals. 2003 Nov;31(SUPPL. 1):43-63. doi: 10.1177/026119290303101s03
Hothorn, Ludwig A. / Statistics of interlaboratory in vitro toxicological studies. In: Alternatives to laboratory animals. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 43-63.
Download
@article{fe7c1ed82f9941cc9f8b798604d2891e,
title = "Statistics of interlaboratory in vitro toxicological studies",
abstract = "Interlaboratory studies are common in toxicology, particularly for the introduction of alternative assays. Numerous papers are available on the statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies, but these deal primarily with the case of a replicated single sample studied in several laboratories: This approach can be used for some assays, but for the majority, the results will be unsatisfactory, i.e. involving great variability between both the dose groups and the laboratories. However, the primary objective of toxicological assays is to achieve similarity between the sizes of effects, rather than to determine absolute values. In the parametric model, the sizes of effects are the studentised differences from the negative control or, for the commonly used dose-response designs, the similarity of the slopes of the dose-response curves. Standard approaches for the estimation of intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability, including Mandel plots, are introduced, and new approaches are presented for demonstrating similarity of effect sizes, with or without assuming a dose-response model. One approach is based on a modification of the parallel-line assay, the other is based on a modification of the interaction contrasts of the analysis of variance. SAS programs are given for all approaches, and real data from an interlaboratory immunotoxicological study are analysed as a demonstration.",
keywords = "Alternatives, In vitro assays, Interaction contrasts, Interlaboratory study, Meta-analysis, Parallel line assay, Statistics, Trend tests",
author = "Hothorn, {Ludwig A.}",
year = "2003",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1177/026119290303101s03",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "43--63",
journal = "Alternatives to laboratory animals",
issn = "0261-1929",
publisher = "FRAME",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistics of interlaboratory in vitro toxicological studies

AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Interlaboratory studies are common in toxicology, particularly for the introduction of alternative assays. Numerous papers are available on the statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies, but these deal primarily with the case of a replicated single sample studied in several laboratories: This approach can be used for some assays, but for the majority, the results will be unsatisfactory, i.e. involving great variability between both the dose groups and the laboratories. However, the primary objective of toxicological assays is to achieve similarity between the sizes of effects, rather than to determine absolute values. In the parametric model, the sizes of effects are the studentised differences from the negative control or, for the commonly used dose-response designs, the similarity of the slopes of the dose-response curves. Standard approaches for the estimation of intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability, including Mandel plots, are introduced, and new approaches are presented for demonstrating similarity of effect sizes, with or without assuming a dose-response model. One approach is based on a modification of the parallel-line assay, the other is based on a modification of the interaction contrasts of the analysis of variance. SAS programs are given for all approaches, and real data from an interlaboratory immunotoxicological study are analysed as a demonstration.

AB - Interlaboratory studies are common in toxicology, particularly for the introduction of alternative assays. Numerous papers are available on the statistical analysis of interlaboratory studies, but these deal primarily with the case of a replicated single sample studied in several laboratories: This approach can be used for some assays, but for the majority, the results will be unsatisfactory, i.e. involving great variability between both the dose groups and the laboratories. However, the primary objective of toxicological assays is to achieve similarity between the sizes of effects, rather than to determine absolute values. In the parametric model, the sizes of effects are the studentised differences from the negative control or, for the commonly used dose-response designs, the similarity of the slopes of the dose-response curves. Standard approaches for the estimation of intralaboratory and interlaboratory variability, including Mandel plots, are introduced, and new approaches are presented for demonstrating similarity of effect sizes, with or without assuming a dose-response model. One approach is based on a modification of the parallel-line assay, the other is based on a modification of the interaction contrasts of the analysis of variance. SAS programs are given for all approaches, and real data from an interlaboratory immunotoxicological study are analysed as a demonstration.

KW - Alternatives

KW - In vitro assays

KW - Interaction contrasts

KW - Interlaboratory study

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Parallel line assay

KW - Statistics

KW - Trend tests

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042196050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/026119290303101s03

DO - 10.1177/026119290303101s03

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15595900

AN - SCOPUS:0042196050

VL - 31

SP - 43

EP - 63

JO - Alternatives to laboratory animals

JF - Alternatives to laboratory animals

SN - 0261-1929

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -