Statistical delay bounds for automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number102029
JournalPerformance evaluation
Volume135
Early online date26 Aug 2019
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Abstract

The recent trend towards low-latency wireless communication requires a notion of non-ergodic capacity that deals with delays. Significant research has contributed such results for relevant physical layer aspects. Less attention has been paid to actual implementations of link layer automatic repeat request protocols. Instead, error-free transmission using instantaneous channel state information, simple stop-and-wait protocols, or instantaneous feedback are frequently assumed. In this work, we investigate protocols with pipelining that deal with packet errors under non-negligible round-trip-times. We define a stochastic service curve model of a general class of automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining and derive statistical waiting time and sojourn time bounds. We discover two regimes: under low to moderate load retransmissions cause the largest part of the sojourn time, whereas under high load the waiting time dominates the sojourn time. Generally, with increasing round-trip-time the basic cases of stop-and-wait protocols or instantaneous feedback neglect relevant effects and provide less accurate estimates.

Keywords

    Automatic repeat request protocols, Performance evaluation, Stochastic network calculus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Statistical delay bounds for automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining. / Akselrod, Mark; Fidler, Markus.
In: Performance evaluation, Vol. 135, 102029, 11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Akselrod M, Fidler M. Statistical delay bounds for automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining. Performance evaluation. 2019 Nov;135:102029. Epub 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.peva.2019.102029
Download
@article{6c12c98d6b79469f85e9684d67290053,
title = "Statistical delay bounds for automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining",
abstract = "The recent trend towards low-latency wireless communication requires a notion of non-ergodic capacity that deals with delays. Significant research has contributed such results for relevant physical layer aspects. Less attention has been paid to actual implementations of link layer automatic repeat request protocols. Instead, error-free transmission using instantaneous channel state information, simple stop-and-wait protocols, or instantaneous feedback are frequently assumed. In this work, we investigate protocols with pipelining that deal with packet errors under non-negligible round-trip-times. We define a stochastic service curve model of a general class of automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining and derive statistical waiting time and sojourn time bounds. We discover two regimes: under low to moderate load retransmissions cause the largest part of the sojourn time, whereas under high load the waiting time dominates the sojourn time. Generally, with increasing round-trip-time the basic cases of stop-and-wait protocols or instantaneous feedback neglect relevant effects and provide less accurate estimates.",
keywords = "Automatic repeat request protocols, Performance evaluation, Stochastic network calculus",
author = "Mark Akselrod and Markus Fidler",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.peva.2019.102029",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
journal = "Performance evaluation",
issn = "0166-5316",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical delay bounds for automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining

AU - Akselrod, Mark

AU - Fidler, Markus

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - The recent trend towards low-latency wireless communication requires a notion of non-ergodic capacity that deals with delays. Significant research has contributed such results for relevant physical layer aspects. Less attention has been paid to actual implementations of link layer automatic repeat request protocols. Instead, error-free transmission using instantaneous channel state information, simple stop-and-wait protocols, or instantaneous feedback are frequently assumed. In this work, we investigate protocols with pipelining that deal with packet errors under non-negligible round-trip-times. We define a stochastic service curve model of a general class of automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining and derive statistical waiting time and sojourn time bounds. We discover two regimes: under low to moderate load retransmissions cause the largest part of the sojourn time, whereas under high load the waiting time dominates the sojourn time. Generally, with increasing round-trip-time the basic cases of stop-and-wait protocols or instantaneous feedback neglect relevant effects and provide less accurate estimates.

AB - The recent trend towards low-latency wireless communication requires a notion of non-ergodic capacity that deals with delays. Significant research has contributed such results for relevant physical layer aspects. Less attention has been paid to actual implementations of link layer automatic repeat request protocols. Instead, error-free transmission using instantaneous channel state information, simple stop-and-wait protocols, or instantaneous feedback are frequently assumed. In this work, we investigate protocols with pipelining that deal with packet errors under non-negligible round-trip-times. We define a stochastic service curve model of a general class of automatic repeat request protocols with pipelining and derive statistical waiting time and sojourn time bounds. We discover two regimes: under low to moderate load retransmissions cause the largest part of the sojourn time, whereas under high load the waiting time dominates the sojourn time. Generally, with increasing round-trip-time the basic cases of stop-and-wait protocols or instantaneous feedback neglect relevant effects and provide less accurate estimates.

KW - Automatic repeat request protocols

KW - Performance evaluation

KW - Stochastic network calculus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071477211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.peva.2019.102029

DO - 10.1016/j.peva.2019.102029

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071477211

VL - 135

JO - Performance evaluation

JF - Performance evaluation

SN - 0166-5316

M1 - 102029

ER -

By the same author(s)