Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Ludwig A. Hothorn
  • Regina Oberdoerfer

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-135
Number of pages11
JournalRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Volume44
Issue number2
Early online date18 Nov 2005
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Abstract

The safety assessment of Novel Food, including GM biotechnology-derived crops, starts with the comparison of the Novel Food with a traditional counterpart that is generally accepted as safe based on a history of human food use. Substantial equivalence is established if no meaningful difference from the conventional counterpart was found, leading to the conclusion that the Novel Food is as safe and nutritious as its traditional counterpart. In general, the non-significance of p value is used for the proof of safety. From a statistical perspective, the problems connected with such an approach are demonstrated, namely that quite different component-specific false negative error rates result. As an alternative, the proof of safety is discussed with the inherently related definition of safety thresholds. Moreover, parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio to control (conventional line) are described in detail. Finally, the treatment of multiple components for a global proof of safety is explained.

Keywords

    Bioequivalence, Genetically modified, Novel food, Proof of safety, Statistics, Substantial equivalence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety. / Hothorn, Ludwig A.; Oberdoerfer, Regina.
In: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 44, No. 2, 03.2006, p. 125-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Hothorn LA, Oberdoerfer R. Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2006 Mar;44(2):125-135. Epub 2005 Nov 18. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.001
Download
@article{74b4d637f7cb4681954325a6a441c8b3,
title = "Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety",
abstract = "The safety assessment of Novel Food, including GM biotechnology-derived crops, starts with the comparison of the Novel Food with a traditional counterpart that is generally accepted as safe based on a history of human food use. Substantial equivalence is established if no meaningful difference from the conventional counterpart was found, leading to the conclusion that the Novel Food is as safe and nutritious as its traditional counterpart. In general, the non-significance of p value is used for the proof of safety. From a statistical perspective, the problems connected with such an approach are demonstrated, namely that quite different component-specific false negative error rates result. As an alternative, the proof of safety is discussed with the inherently related definition of safety thresholds. Moreover, parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio to control (conventional line) are described in detail. Finally, the treatment of multiple components for a global proof of safety is explained.",
keywords = "Bioequivalence, Genetically modified, Novel food, Proof of safety, Statistics, Substantial equivalence",
author = "Hothorn, {Ludwig A.} and Regina Oberdoerfer",
year = "2006",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "125--135",
journal = "Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology",
issn = "0273-2300",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety

AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.

AU - Oberdoerfer, Regina

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - The safety assessment of Novel Food, including GM biotechnology-derived crops, starts with the comparison of the Novel Food with a traditional counterpart that is generally accepted as safe based on a history of human food use. Substantial equivalence is established if no meaningful difference from the conventional counterpart was found, leading to the conclusion that the Novel Food is as safe and nutritious as its traditional counterpart. In general, the non-significance of p value is used for the proof of safety. From a statistical perspective, the problems connected with such an approach are demonstrated, namely that quite different component-specific false negative error rates result. As an alternative, the proof of safety is discussed with the inherently related definition of safety thresholds. Moreover, parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio to control (conventional line) are described in detail. Finally, the treatment of multiple components for a global proof of safety is explained.

AB - The safety assessment of Novel Food, including GM biotechnology-derived crops, starts with the comparison of the Novel Food with a traditional counterpart that is generally accepted as safe based on a history of human food use. Substantial equivalence is established if no meaningful difference from the conventional counterpart was found, leading to the conclusion that the Novel Food is as safe and nutritious as its traditional counterpart. In general, the non-significance of p value is used for the proof of safety. From a statistical perspective, the problems connected with such an approach are demonstrated, namely that quite different component-specific false negative error rates result. As an alternative, the proof of safety is discussed with the inherently related definition of safety thresholds. Moreover, parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio to control (conventional line) are described in detail. Finally, the treatment of multiple components for a global proof of safety is explained.

KW - Bioequivalence

KW - Genetically modified

KW - Novel food

KW - Proof of safety

KW - Statistics

KW - Substantial equivalence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32544457857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.10.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 16298467

AN - SCOPUS:32544457857

VL - 44

SP - 125

EP - 135

JO - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

JF - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

SN - 0273-2300

IS - 2

ER -