Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

External Research Organisations

  • University of Education
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-39
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
Volume45
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2010
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Low-level processes of children's written language production are cognitively more costly than those involved in speaking. This has been shown by French authors who compared oral and written memory span performance. The observed difficulties of children's, but not of adults' low-level processes in writing may stem from graphomotoric as well as from orthographic inadequacies. We report on five experiments designed to replicate and expand the original results. First, the French results were successfully replicated for German third-graders, and for university students. Then, the developmental changes of the cognitive costs of writing were examined during primary school, comparing the performance of second- and fourth-graders. Next, we show that unpractised writing modes, which were experimentally induced, also lead to a decrease of memory performance in adults, which supports the assumption that a lack of graphomotoric automation is responsible for the observed effects in children. However, unpractised handwriting yields clearer results than unpractised typing. Lastly, we try to separate the influences of graphomotoric as opposed to orthographic difficulties by having the words composed through pointing on a "spelling board". This attempt, however, has not been successful, probably because the pointing to letters introduced other low-level costs. In sum, throughout the four years of primary school, German children show worse memory span performance in writing compared to oral recall, with an overall increase in both modalities. Thus, writing had not fully caught up with speaking regarding the implied cognitive costs by the end of primary school. Therefore, conclusions relate to the question of how to assess properly any kind of knowledge and abilities through language production.

Keywords

    Language production, Memory span, Working memory, Writing development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance. / Grabowski, Joachim.
In: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 28-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{060462aa578845df8cb778db27d988c7,
title = "Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance",
abstract = "Low-level processes of children's written language production are cognitively more costly than those involved in speaking. This has been shown by French authors who compared oral and written memory span performance. The observed difficulties of children's, but not of adults' low-level processes in writing may stem from graphomotoric as well as from orthographic inadequacies. We report on five experiments designed to replicate and expand the original results. First, the French results were successfully replicated for German third-graders, and for university students. Then, the developmental changes of the cognitive costs of writing were examined during primary school, comparing the performance of second- and fourth-graders. Next, we show that unpractised writing modes, which were experimentally induced, also lead to a decrease of memory performance in adults, which supports the assumption that a lack of graphomotoric automation is responsible for the observed effects in children. However, unpractised handwriting yields clearer results than unpractised typing. Lastly, we try to separate the influences of graphomotoric as opposed to orthographic difficulties by having the words composed through pointing on a {"}spelling board{"}. This attempt, however, has not been successful, probably because the pointing to letters introduced other low-level costs. In sum, throughout the four years of primary school, German children show worse memory span performance in writing compared to oral recall, with an overall increase in both modalities. Thus, writing had not fully caught up with speaking regarding the implied cognitive costs by the end of primary school. Therefore, conclusions relate to the question of how to assess properly any kind of knowledge and abilities through language production.",
keywords = "Language production, Memory span, Working memory, Writing development",
author = "Joachim Grabowski",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2010",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1080/00207590902914051",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "28--39",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaking, writing, and memory span in children

T2 - Output modality affects cognitive performance

AU - Grabowski, Joachim

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Low-level processes of children's written language production are cognitively more costly than those involved in speaking. This has been shown by French authors who compared oral and written memory span performance. The observed difficulties of children's, but not of adults' low-level processes in writing may stem from graphomotoric as well as from orthographic inadequacies. We report on five experiments designed to replicate and expand the original results. First, the French results were successfully replicated for German third-graders, and for university students. Then, the developmental changes of the cognitive costs of writing were examined during primary school, comparing the performance of second- and fourth-graders. Next, we show that unpractised writing modes, which were experimentally induced, also lead to a decrease of memory performance in adults, which supports the assumption that a lack of graphomotoric automation is responsible for the observed effects in children. However, unpractised handwriting yields clearer results than unpractised typing. Lastly, we try to separate the influences of graphomotoric as opposed to orthographic difficulties by having the words composed through pointing on a "spelling board". This attempt, however, has not been successful, probably because the pointing to letters introduced other low-level costs. In sum, throughout the four years of primary school, German children show worse memory span performance in writing compared to oral recall, with an overall increase in both modalities. Thus, writing had not fully caught up with speaking regarding the implied cognitive costs by the end of primary school. Therefore, conclusions relate to the question of how to assess properly any kind of knowledge and abilities through language production.

AB - Low-level processes of children's written language production are cognitively more costly than those involved in speaking. This has been shown by French authors who compared oral and written memory span performance. The observed difficulties of children's, but not of adults' low-level processes in writing may stem from graphomotoric as well as from orthographic inadequacies. We report on five experiments designed to replicate and expand the original results. First, the French results were successfully replicated for German third-graders, and for university students. Then, the developmental changes of the cognitive costs of writing were examined during primary school, comparing the performance of second- and fourth-graders. Next, we show that unpractised writing modes, which were experimentally induced, also lead to a decrease of memory performance in adults, which supports the assumption that a lack of graphomotoric automation is responsible for the observed effects in children. However, unpractised handwriting yields clearer results than unpractised typing. Lastly, we try to separate the influences of graphomotoric as opposed to orthographic difficulties by having the words composed through pointing on a "spelling board". This attempt, however, has not been successful, probably because the pointing to letters introduced other low-level costs. In sum, throughout the four years of primary school, German children show worse memory span performance in writing compared to oral recall, with an overall increase in both modalities. Thus, writing had not fully caught up with speaking regarding the implied cognitive costs by the end of primary school. Therefore, conclusions relate to the question of how to assess properly any kind of knowledge and abilities through language production.

KW - Language production

KW - Memory span

KW - Working memory

KW - Writing development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649119901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00207590902914051

DO - 10.1080/00207590902914051

M3 - Article

C2 - 22043846

AN - SCOPUS:77649119901

VL - 45

SP - 28

EP - 39

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)