Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 184-202 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies |
Volume | 15 |
Early online date | 20 Feb 2018 |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2018 |
Abstract
Study region: Region in Lower Saxony (North Germany) covered by the measuring range of the weather radar device located near Hanover (approx. 50.000 m2). Study focus: This study investigates the performance of various spatial interpolation techniques for climate variables. Meteorological observations are usually recorded as site-specific point information by weather stations and estimation accuracy for unobserved locations depends generally on station density, temporal resolution, spatial variation of the variable and choice of interpolation method. This work aims to evaluate the influence of these factors on interpolation performance of different climate variables. A cross validation analysis was performed for precipitation, temperature, humidity, cloud coverage, sunshine duration, and wind speed observations. Hourly to yearly temporal resolutions and different additional information were considered. New hydrological insights: Geostatistical techniques provide a better performance for all climate variables compared to simple methods Radar data improves the estimation of rainfall with hourly temporal resolution, while topography is useful for weekly to yearly values and temperature in general. No helpful information was found for cloudiness, sunshine duration, and wind speed, while interpolation of humidity benefitted from additional temperature data. The influences of temporal resolution, spatial variability, and additional information appear to be stronger than station density effects. High spatial variability of hourly precipitation causes the highest error, followed by wind speed, cloud coverage and sunshine duration. Lowest errors occur for temperature and humidity.
Keywords
- Climate data, Geostatistics, Interpolation, Kriging
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Water Science and Technology
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, Vol. 15, 02.2018, p. 184-202.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial interpolation of climate variables in Northern Germany
T2 - Influence of temporal resolution and network density
AU - Berndt, C.
AU - Haberlandt, U.
N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank the German Weather Service for providing the meteorological observations and Ross Pidoto for correcting an early version of the manuscript. This research was partly funded by the German Environment Agency (RESTNI, project number: 3710422182) and the Lower Saxony Water Management, Coastal Defence and Nature Conservation Agency (KliBiW, no project number available). The article publication was funded by the Open Access fund of Leibniz Universität Hannover. Finally, the reviewer and the editor are gratefully acknowledged for their contributions.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Study region: Region in Lower Saxony (North Germany) covered by the measuring range of the weather radar device located near Hanover (approx. 50.000 m2). Study focus: This study investigates the performance of various spatial interpolation techniques for climate variables. Meteorological observations are usually recorded as site-specific point information by weather stations and estimation accuracy for unobserved locations depends generally on station density, temporal resolution, spatial variation of the variable and choice of interpolation method. This work aims to evaluate the influence of these factors on interpolation performance of different climate variables. A cross validation analysis was performed for precipitation, temperature, humidity, cloud coverage, sunshine duration, and wind speed observations. Hourly to yearly temporal resolutions and different additional information were considered. New hydrological insights: Geostatistical techniques provide a better performance for all climate variables compared to simple methods Radar data improves the estimation of rainfall with hourly temporal resolution, while topography is useful for weekly to yearly values and temperature in general. No helpful information was found for cloudiness, sunshine duration, and wind speed, while interpolation of humidity benefitted from additional temperature data. The influences of temporal resolution, spatial variability, and additional information appear to be stronger than station density effects. High spatial variability of hourly precipitation causes the highest error, followed by wind speed, cloud coverage and sunshine duration. Lowest errors occur for temperature and humidity.
AB - Study region: Region in Lower Saxony (North Germany) covered by the measuring range of the weather radar device located near Hanover (approx. 50.000 m2). Study focus: This study investigates the performance of various spatial interpolation techniques for climate variables. Meteorological observations are usually recorded as site-specific point information by weather stations and estimation accuracy for unobserved locations depends generally on station density, temporal resolution, spatial variation of the variable and choice of interpolation method. This work aims to evaluate the influence of these factors on interpolation performance of different climate variables. A cross validation analysis was performed for precipitation, temperature, humidity, cloud coverage, sunshine duration, and wind speed observations. Hourly to yearly temporal resolutions and different additional information were considered. New hydrological insights: Geostatistical techniques provide a better performance for all climate variables compared to simple methods Radar data improves the estimation of rainfall with hourly temporal resolution, while topography is useful for weekly to yearly values and temperature in general. No helpful information was found for cloudiness, sunshine duration, and wind speed, while interpolation of humidity benefitted from additional temperature data. The influences of temporal resolution, spatial variability, and additional information appear to be stronger than station density effects. High spatial variability of hourly precipitation causes the highest error, followed by wind speed, cloud coverage and sunshine duration. Lowest errors occur for temperature and humidity.
KW - Climate data
KW - Geostatistics
KW - Interpolation
KW - Kriging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044443301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.02.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044443301
VL - 15
SP - 184
EP - 202
JO - Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
JF - Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
ER -