Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial in journalResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Benjamin Burkhard
  • Rudolf De Groot
  • Robert Costanza
  • Ralf Seppelt
  • Sven Erik Jørgensen
  • Marion Potschin

External Research Organisations

  • Kiel University
  • Wageningen University and Research
  • Portland State University
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Nottingham
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalEcological indicators
Volume21
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

The evaluation of environmental, social and economic tradeoffs requires a combined view of how the various ecosystem or landscape function approaches are linked. An emerging need for scientific development, as well as fostering of applications and environmental management based on of the ecosystem service concept has been identified. The human population of earth is likely to increase to 9 billion people by the end of the century, the global climate is being transformed, biodiversity loss continues, and conventional, fossil-based economies are no longer a viable option. Accounting looks at the flow of processes or materials and is relatively objective, while assessment evaluates a system or process with a goal in mind and is more normative. Both are integrating frameworks that have distinctive roles. Both ecosystem service accounting and assessment need to be established and pursued in a broader socio-ecological context.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. / Burkhard, Benjamin; De Groot, Rudolf; Costanza, Robert et al.
In: Ecological indicators, Vol. 21, 10.2012, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial in journalResearchpeer review

Burkhard, B, De Groot, R, Costanza, R, Seppelt, R, Jørgensen, SE & Potschin, M 2012, 'Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services', Ecological indicators, vol. 21, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008
Burkhard, B., De Groot, R., Costanza, R., Seppelt, R., Jørgensen, S. E., & Potschin, M. (2012). Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological indicators, 21, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008
Burkhard B, De Groot R, Costanza R, Seppelt R, Jørgensen SE, Potschin M. Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological indicators. 2012 Oct;21:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008
Burkhard, Benjamin ; De Groot, Rudolf ; Costanza, Robert et al. / Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. In: Ecological indicators. 2012 ; Vol. 21. pp. 1-6.
Download
@article{5e2ddd50d94e4814b9334b8cc3f42176,
title = "Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services",
abstract = "The evaluation of environmental, social and economic tradeoffs requires a combined view of how the various ecosystem or landscape function approaches are linked. An emerging need for scientific development, as well as fostering of applications and environmental management based on of the ecosystem service concept has been identified. The human population of earth is likely to increase to 9 billion people by the end of the century, the global climate is being transformed, biodiversity loss continues, and conventional, fossil-based economies are no longer a viable option. Accounting looks at the flow of processes or materials and is relatively objective, while assessment evaluates a system or process with a goal in mind and is more normative. Both are integrating frameworks that have distinctive roles. Both ecosystem service accounting and assessment need to be established and pursued in a broader socio-ecological context.",
author = "Benjamin Burkhard and {De Groot}, Rudolf and Robert Costanza and Ralf Seppelt and J{\o}rgensen, {Sven Erik} and Marion Potschin",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Ecological indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

AU - De Groot, Rudolf

AU - Costanza, Robert

AU - Seppelt, Ralf

AU - Jørgensen, Sven Erik

AU - Potschin, Marion

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - The evaluation of environmental, social and economic tradeoffs requires a combined view of how the various ecosystem or landscape function approaches are linked. An emerging need for scientific development, as well as fostering of applications and environmental management based on of the ecosystem service concept has been identified. The human population of earth is likely to increase to 9 billion people by the end of the century, the global climate is being transformed, biodiversity loss continues, and conventional, fossil-based economies are no longer a viable option. Accounting looks at the flow of processes or materials and is relatively objective, while assessment evaluates a system or process with a goal in mind and is more normative. Both are integrating frameworks that have distinctive roles. Both ecosystem service accounting and assessment need to be established and pursued in a broader socio-ecological context.

AB - The evaluation of environmental, social and economic tradeoffs requires a combined view of how the various ecosystem or landscape function approaches are linked. An emerging need for scientific development, as well as fostering of applications and environmental management based on of the ecosystem service concept has been identified. The human population of earth is likely to increase to 9 billion people by the end of the century, the global climate is being transformed, biodiversity loss continues, and conventional, fossil-based economies are no longer a viable option. Accounting looks at the flow of processes or materials and is relatively objective, while assessment evaluates a system or process with a goal in mind and is more normative. Both are integrating frameworks that have distinctive roles. Both ecosystem service accounting and assessment need to be established and pursued in a broader socio-ecological context.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860722424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008

M3 - Editorial in journal

AN - SCOPUS:84860722424

VL - 21

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Ecological indicators

JF - Ecological indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -

By the same author(s)