Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • University of Freiburg
  • University of British Columbia
  • Leiden University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning
PublisherSpringer International Publishing AG
Pages583-615
Number of pages33
ISBN (electronic)9783319635163
ISBN (print)9783319635156
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

In recent years the availability of parallel computation resources has grown rapidly. Nevertheless, even for the most widely studied constraint programming problems such as SAT, solver development and applications remain largely focussed on sequential rather than parallel approaches. To ease the burden usually associated with designing, implementing and testing parallel solvers, in this chapter, we demonstrate how methods from automatic algorithm design can be used to construct effective parallel portfolio solvers from sequential components. Specifically, we discuss two prominent approaches for this problem. (I) Parallel portfolio selection involves selecting a parallel portfolio consisting of complementary sequential solvers for a specific instance to be solved (as characterised by cheaply computable instance features). Applied to a broad set of sequential SAT solvers from SAT competitions, we show that our generic approach achieves nearly linear speedup on application instances, and super-linear speedups on combinatorial and random instances. (II) Automatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration involves a parallel portfolio of algorithm parameter configurations that is optimized for a given set of instances. Applied to gold-medal-winning parameterized SAT solvers, we show that our approach can produce significantly better-performing SAT solvers than state-ofthe- art parallel solvers constructed by human experts, reducing time-outs by 17% and running time (PAR10 score) by 13% under competition conditions.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios. / Lindauer, Marius; Hoos, Holger; Hutter, Frank et al.
Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning. Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. p. 583-615.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Lindauer, M, Hoos, H, Hutter, F & Leyton-Brown, K 2018, Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios. in Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning. Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 583-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63516-3_15
Lindauer, M., Hoos, H., Hutter, F., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2018). Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios. In Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning (pp. 583-615). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63516-3_15
Lindauer M, Hoos H, Hutter F, Leyton-Brown K. Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios. In Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning. Springer International Publishing AG. 2018. p. 583-615 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-63516-3_15
Lindauer, Marius ; Hoos, Holger ; Hutter, Frank et al. / Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios. Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning. Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. pp. 583-615
Download
@inbook{dda9a1ae29d44e60bcce6a887df35b79,
title = "Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios",
abstract = "In recent years the availability of parallel computation resources has grown rapidly. Nevertheless, even for the most widely studied constraint programming problems such as SAT, solver development and applications remain largely focussed on sequential rather than parallel approaches. To ease the burden usually associated with designing, implementing and testing parallel solvers, in this chapter, we demonstrate how methods from automatic algorithm design can be used to construct effective parallel portfolio solvers from sequential components. Specifically, we discuss two prominent approaches for this problem. (I) Parallel portfolio selection involves selecting a parallel portfolio consisting of complementary sequential solvers for a specific instance to be solved (as characterised by cheaply computable instance features). Applied to a broad set of sequential SAT solvers from SAT competitions, we show that our generic approach achieves nearly linear speedup on application instances, and super-linear speedups on combinatorial and random instances. (II) Automatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration involves a parallel portfolio of algorithm parameter configurations that is optimized for a given set of instances. Applied to gold-medal-winning parameterized SAT solvers, we show that our approach can produce significantly better-performing SAT solvers than state-ofthe- art parallel solvers constructed by human experts, reducing time-outs by 17% and running time (PAR10 score) by 13% under competition conditions.",
author = "Marius Lindauer and Holger Hoos and Frank Hutter and Kevin Leyton-Brown",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-63516-3_15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319635156",
pages = "583--615",
booktitle = "Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
address = "Switzerland",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Selection and Configuration of Parallel Portfolios

AU - Lindauer, Marius

AU - Hoos, Holger

AU - Hutter, Frank

AU - Leyton-Brown, Kevin

PY - 2018/4/6

Y1 - 2018/4/6

N2 - In recent years the availability of parallel computation resources has grown rapidly. Nevertheless, even for the most widely studied constraint programming problems such as SAT, solver development and applications remain largely focussed on sequential rather than parallel approaches. To ease the burden usually associated with designing, implementing and testing parallel solvers, in this chapter, we demonstrate how methods from automatic algorithm design can be used to construct effective parallel portfolio solvers from sequential components. Specifically, we discuss two prominent approaches for this problem. (I) Parallel portfolio selection involves selecting a parallel portfolio consisting of complementary sequential solvers for a specific instance to be solved (as characterised by cheaply computable instance features). Applied to a broad set of sequential SAT solvers from SAT competitions, we show that our generic approach achieves nearly linear speedup on application instances, and super-linear speedups on combinatorial and random instances. (II) Automatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration involves a parallel portfolio of algorithm parameter configurations that is optimized for a given set of instances. Applied to gold-medal-winning parameterized SAT solvers, we show that our approach can produce significantly better-performing SAT solvers than state-ofthe- art parallel solvers constructed by human experts, reducing time-outs by 17% and running time (PAR10 score) by 13% under competition conditions.

AB - In recent years the availability of parallel computation resources has grown rapidly. Nevertheless, even for the most widely studied constraint programming problems such as SAT, solver development and applications remain largely focussed on sequential rather than parallel approaches. To ease the burden usually associated with designing, implementing and testing parallel solvers, in this chapter, we demonstrate how methods from automatic algorithm design can be used to construct effective parallel portfolio solvers from sequential components. Specifically, we discuss two prominent approaches for this problem. (I) Parallel portfolio selection involves selecting a parallel portfolio consisting of complementary sequential solvers for a specific instance to be solved (as characterised by cheaply computable instance features). Applied to a broad set of sequential SAT solvers from SAT competitions, we show that our generic approach achieves nearly linear speedup on application instances, and super-linear speedups on combinatorial and random instances. (II) Automatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration involves a parallel portfolio of algorithm parameter configurations that is optimized for a given set of instances. Applied to gold-medal-winning parameterized SAT solvers, we show that our approach can produce significantly better-performing SAT solvers than state-ofthe- art parallel solvers constructed by human experts, reducing time-outs by 17% and running time (PAR10 score) by 13% under competition conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053996010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-63516-3_15

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-63516-3_15

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:85053996010

SN - 9783319635156

SP - 583

EP - 615

BT - Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning

PB - Springer International Publishing AG

ER -

By the same author(s)