Details
Original language | German |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 737-751 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Zeitschrift für Pädagogik (druck) |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 5 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 1998 |
Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
Drawing on Weber's differentiation between value judgement and scientific judgement, the authors analyze the programmatics of the Brandenburg initiative for the introduction of the school subject "Ways of Living - Ethics - Religion" (LER). In this, they take seriously the claim that this subject represents a secularized alternative to the required elective alternative Religion/Ethics. A detailed analysis of the structure of meaning of the programmatic leitmotif reveals that LER does not dispense with either the claim to pragmatic immediacy or the validity of scientific argumentation. In so far, LER does not convince as a countermodel to religion as a school subject. It contributes nothing to the solution of the structural problems of the modern science-oriented school.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
- Social Sciences(all)
- Education
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik (druck), Vol. 44, No. 5, 09.1998, p. 737-751.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Säkularisierte Prophetie
T2 - Das Fach "Lebensgestaltung - Ethik - Religionskunde" (LER) in der verwissenschaftlichten schule
AU - Tiedtke, Michael
AU - Wernet, Andreas
PY - 1998/9
Y1 - 1998/9
N2 - Drawing on Weber's differentiation between value judgement and scientific judgement, the authors analyze the programmatics of the Brandenburg initiative for the introduction of the school subject "Ways of Living - Ethics - Religion" (LER). In this, they take seriously the claim that this subject represents a secularized alternative to the required elective alternative Religion/Ethics. A detailed analysis of the structure of meaning of the programmatic leitmotif reveals that LER does not dispense with either the claim to pragmatic immediacy or the validity of scientific argumentation. In so far, LER does not convince as a countermodel to religion as a school subject. It contributes nothing to the solution of the structural problems of the modern science-oriented school.
AB - Drawing on Weber's differentiation between value judgement and scientific judgement, the authors analyze the programmatics of the Brandenburg initiative for the introduction of the school subject "Ways of Living - Ethics - Religion" (LER). In this, they take seriously the claim that this subject represents a secularized alternative to the required elective alternative Religion/Ethics. A detailed analysis of the structure of meaning of the programmatic leitmotif reveals that LER does not dispense with either the claim to pragmatic immediacy or the validity of scientific argumentation. In so far, LER does not convince as a countermodel to religion as a school subject. It contributes nothing to the solution of the structural problems of the modern science-oriented school.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11644314363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Artikel
AN - SCOPUS:11644314363
VL - 44
SP - 737
EP - 751
JO - Zeitschrift für Pädagogik (druck)
JF - Zeitschrift für Pädagogik (druck)
SN - 0044-3247
IS - 5
ER -