Russeting in apple and pear: A plastic periderm replaces a stiff cuticle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Bishnu P. Khanal
  • Eckhard Grimm
  • Moritz Knoche
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpls048
JournalAOB PLANTS
Volume5
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2013

Abstract

Background and aims Russeting in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) and pears (Pyrus communis L.) is a disorder of the fruit skin that results from microscopic cracks in the cuticle and the subsequent formation of a periderm. To better understand russeting, rheological properties of cuticular membranes (CM) and periderm membranes (PM) were studied from the russet-sensitive apple 'Karmijn de Sonnaville' and from 'Conference' pear. Methodology The CM and PM were isolated enzymatically, investigated by microscopy and subjected to tensile tests, creep/relaxation tests and to stepwise creep tests using a material testing machine. Principal results The isolated CM formed a continuous polymer, whereas the PM represented a cellular structure of stacked cork cells. Tensile tests revealed higher plasticity of the hydrated PM compared with the CM, as indicated by a higher strain at the maximum force (1max) and a lower modulus of elasticity (E). In apple, the maximum force (Fmax) was higher in the CM than in the PM but in pear the higher Fmax value was found for the PM. In specimens obtained from the CM : PM transition zone, the weak point in apple was found to be at the CM : PM borderline but in pear it was within the CM. In both apple and pear, creep/relaxation tests revealed elastic strain, creep strain, viscoelastic strain and viscous strain components in both the PM and CM. For any particular force, strains were always greater in the PM than in the CM and were also greater in pear than in apple. The 1max and Fmax values of the CM and PM were lower than those of nonrusseted and russeted whole-fruit skin segments, which included adhering tissue. Conclusions In russeting, stiff CM are replaced by more plastic PM. Further, the cell layers underlying the CM and PM represent the load-bearing structure in the fruit skin in apple and pear.

Keywords

    Cuticular membrane, Fracture, Fruit skin, Mechanical properties, Rheology, Russet, Strain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Russeting in apple and pear: A plastic periderm replaces a stiff cuticle. / Khanal, Bishnu P.; Grimm, Eckhard; Knoche, Moritz.
In: AOB PLANTS, Vol. 5, pls048, 23.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Khanal BP, Grimm E, Knoche M. Russeting in apple and pear: A plastic periderm replaces a stiff cuticle. AOB PLANTS. 2013 Jan 23;5:pls048. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/pls048
Khanal, Bishnu P. ; Grimm, Eckhard ; Knoche, Moritz. / Russeting in apple and pear : A plastic periderm replaces a stiff cuticle. In: AOB PLANTS. 2013 ; Vol. 5.
Download
@article{5021cadf77394562832150eb86b5b1d7,
title = "Russeting in apple and pear: A plastic periderm replaces a stiff cuticle",
abstract = "Background and aims Russeting in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) and pears (Pyrus communis L.) is a disorder of the fruit skin that results from microscopic cracks in the cuticle and the subsequent formation of a periderm. To better understand russeting, rheological properties of cuticular membranes (CM) and periderm membranes (PM) were studied from the russet-sensitive apple 'Karmijn de Sonnaville' and from 'Conference' pear. Methodology The CM and PM were isolated enzymatically, investigated by microscopy and subjected to tensile tests, creep/relaxation tests and to stepwise creep tests using a material testing machine. Principal results The isolated CM formed a continuous polymer, whereas the PM represented a cellular structure of stacked cork cells. Tensile tests revealed higher plasticity of the hydrated PM compared with the CM, as indicated by a higher strain at the maximum force (1max) and a lower modulus of elasticity (E). In apple, the maximum force (Fmax) was higher in the CM than in the PM but in pear the higher Fmax value was found for the PM. In specimens obtained from the CM : PM transition zone, the weak point in apple was found to be at the CM : PM borderline but in pear it was within the CM. In both apple and pear, creep/relaxation tests revealed elastic strain, creep strain, viscoelastic strain and viscous strain components in both the PM and CM. For any particular force, strains were always greater in the PM than in the CM and were also greater in pear than in apple. The 1max and Fmax values of the CM and PM were lower than those of nonrusseted and russeted whole-fruit skin segments, which included adhering tissue. Conclusions In russeting, stiff CM are replaced by more plastic PM. Further, the cell layers underlying the CM and PM represent the load-bearing structure in the fruit skin in apple and pear.",
keywords = "Cuticular membrane, Fracture, Fruit skin, Mechanical properties, Rheology, Russet, Strain",
author = "Khanal, {Bishnu P.} and Eckhard Grimm and Moritz Knoche",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1093/aobpla/pls048",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "AOB PLANTS",
issn = "2041-2851",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Russeting in apple and pear

T2 - A plastic periderm replaces a stiff cuticle

AU - Khanal, Bishnu P.

AU - Grimm, Eckhard

AU - Knoche, Moritz

PY - 2013/1/23

Y1 - 2013/1/23

N2 - Background and aims Russeting in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) and pears (Pyrus communis L.) is a disorder of the fruit skin that results from microscopic cracks in the cuticle and the subsequent formation of a periderm. To better understand russeting, rheological properties of cuticular membranes (CM) and periderm membranes (PM) were studied from the russet-sensitive apple 'Karmijn de Sonnaville' and from 'Conference' pear. Methodology The CM and PM were isolated enzymatically, investigated by microscopy and subjected to tensile tests, creep/relaxation tests and to stepwise creep tests using a material testing machine. Principal results The isolated CM formed a continuous polymer, whereas the PM represented a cellular structure of stacked cork cells. Tensile tests revealed higher plasticity of the hydrated PM compared with the CM, as indicated by a higher strain at the maximum force (1max) and a lower modulus of elasticity (E). In apple, the maximum force (Fmax) was higher in the CM than in the PM but in pear the higher Fmax value was found for the PM. In specimens obtained from the CM : PM transition zone, the weak point in apple was found to be at the CM : PM borderline but in pear it was within the CM. In both apple and pear, creep/relaxation tests revealed elastic strain, creep strain, viscoelastic strain and viscous strain components in both the PM and CM. For any particular force, strains were always greater in the PM than in the CM and were also greater in pear than in apple. The 1max and Fmax values of the CM and PM were lower than those of nonrusseted and russeted whole-fruit skin segments, which included adhering tissue. Conclusions In russeting, stiff CM are replaced by more plastic PM. Further, the cell layers underlying the CM and PM represent the load-bearing structure in the fruit skin in apple and pear.

AB - Background and aims Russeting in apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) and pears (Pyrus communis L.) is a disorder of the fruit skin that results from microscopic cracks in the cuticle and the subsequent formation of a periderm. To better understand russeting, rheological properties of cuticular membranes (CM) and periderm membranes (PM) were studied from the russet-sensitive apple 'Karmijn de Sonnaville' and from 'Conference' pear. Methodology The CM and PM were isolated enzymatically, investigated by microscopy and subjected to tensile tests, creep/relaxation tests and to stepwise creep tests using a material testing machine. Principal results The isolated CM formed a continuous polymer, whereas the PM represented a cellular structure of stacked cork cells. Tensile tests revealed higher plasticity of the hydrated PM compared with the CM, as indicated by a higher strain at the maximum force (1max) and a lower modulus of elasticity (E). In apple, the maximum force (Fmax) was higher in the CM than in the PM but in pear the higher Fmax value was found for the PM. In specimens obtained from the CM : PM transition zone, the weak point in apple was found to be at the CM : PM borderline but in pear it was within the CM. In both apple and pear, creep/relaxation tests revealed elastic strain, creep strain, viscoelastic strain and viscous strain components in both the PM and CM. For any particular force, strains were always greater in the PM than in the CM and were also greater in pear than in apple. The 1max and Fmax values of the CM and PM were lower than those of nonrusseted and russeted whole-fruit skin segments, which included adhering tissue. Conclusions In russeting, stiff CM are replaced by more plastic PM. Further, the cell layers underlying the CM and PM represent the load-bearing structure in the fruit skin in apple and pear.

KW - Cuticular membrane

KW - Fracture

KW - Fruit skin

KW - Mechanical properties

KW - Rheology

KW - Russet

KW - Strain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884965324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aobpla/pls048

DO - 10.1093/aobpla/pls048

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84884965324

VL - 5

JO - AOB PLANTS

JF - AOB PLANTS

SN - 2041-2851

M1 - pls048

ER -