Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 131-145 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Plant and soil |
Volume | 223 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Abstract
Root observations were carried out on cauliflower using the minirhizotron and the soil core method in two years on two locations with different soil types, a loess loam and a humic loamy sand. Total root length (RL) (cm cm-2) of cauliflower was correlated to total shoot dry weight (W(sh)) (g m-2) RL=0.0124(±0.005)*W(sh), r2=0.76. There was an acceptable correlation (r2=0.88) between the minirhizotron and the soil core methods for the sub-soil data, whereas the minirhizotron method underestimated rooting intensity for the top soil. Changes in rooting depth over time could be described for both soil types using a segmented function of temperature sum, consisting of an early exponential and a later linear phase. The increase of rooting depth during the linear phase was 0.107(±0.01) cm °C-1 d-1. A simple descriptive root growth model based on the assumptions of a negative exponential decline of root length density (RLD) with soil depth, of a fixed ratio of RLD at the top of the soil profile and at rooting depth (r(RLD)) and of a fixed fraction of dry matter increase allocated to fine-roots (f(fR)) was formulated and used to describe the temporal and spatial variation of RLD found in the field. Slightly diffent estimates of f(fR) and of r(RLD) could be found for the different soil types, indicating a higher fraction of fine-root dry matter for the loess loam soil and a somewhat deeper root system for the humic loamy sand soil. A cross validation using the parameter values obtained from adjusting to the rooting data of one soil type for predicting RLD values of the other soil type, however, indicated that still quite satisfactory estimates (r2=0.91 and 0.95) of RLD could be obtained.
Keywords
- Cauliflower, Dry matter production, Minirhizotron method, Model, Roots
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Soil Science
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Plant Science
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Plant and soil, Vol. 223, No. 1-2, 2000, p. 131-145.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Root growth of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. botrytis) under unstressed conditions
T2 - Measurement and modelling
AU - Kage, H.
AU - Kochler, M.
AU - Stützel, H.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Root observations were carried out on cauliflower using the minirhizotron and the soil core method in two years on two locations with different soil types, a loess loam and a humic loamy sand. Total root length (RL) (cm cm-2) of cauliflower was correlated to total shoot dry weight (W(sh)) (g m-2) RL=0.0124(±0.005)*W(sh), r2=0.76. There was an acceptable correlation (r2=0.88) between the minirhizotron and the soil core methods for the sub-soil data, whereas the minirhizotron method underestimated rooting intensity for the top soil. Changes in rooting depth over time could be described for both soil types using a segmented function of temperature sum, consisting of an early exponential and a later linear phase. The increase of rooting depth during the linear phase was 0.107(±0.01) cm °C-1 d-1. A simple descriptive root growth model based on the assumptions of a negative exponential decline of root length density (RLD) with soil depth, of a fixed ratio of RLD at the top of the soil profile and at rooting depth (r(RLD)) and of a fixed fraction of dry matter increase allocated to fine-roots (f(fR)) was formulated and used to describe the temporal and spatial variation of RLD found in the field. Slightly diffent estimates of f(fR) and of r(RLD) could be found for the different soil types, indicating a higher fraction of fine-root dry matter for the loess loam soil and a somewhat deeper root system for the humic loamy sand soil. A cross validation using the parameter values obtained from adjusting to the rooting data of one soil type for predicting RLD values of the other soil type, however, indicated that still quite satisfactory estimates (r2=0.91 and 0.95) of RLD could be obtained.
AB - Root observations were carried out on cauliflower using the minirhizotron and the soil core method in two years on two locations with different soil types, a loess loam and a humic loamy sand. Total root length (RL) (cm cm-2) of cauliflower was correlated to total shoot dry weight (W(sh)) (g m-2) RL=0.0124(±0.005)*W(sh), r2=0.76. There was an acceptable correlation (r2=0.88) between the minirhizotron and the soil core methods for the sub-soil data, whereas the minirhizotron method underestimated rooting intensity for the top soil. Changes in rooting depth over time could be described for both soil types using a segmented function of temperature sum, consisting of an early exponential and a later linear phase. The increase of rooting depth during the linear phase was 0.107(±0.01) cm °C-1 d-1. A simple descriptive root growth model based on the assumptions of a negative exponential decline of root length density (RLD) with soil depth, of a fixed ratio of RLD at the top of the soil profile and at rooting depth (r(RLD)) and of a fixed fraction of dry matter increase allocated to fine-roots (f(fR)) was formulated and used to describe the temporal and spatial variation of RLD found in the field. Slightly diffent estimates of f(fR) and of r(RLD) could be found for the different soil types, indicating a higher fraction of fine-root dry matter for the loess loam soil and a somewhat deeper root system for the humic loamy sand soil. A cross validation using the parameter values obtained from adjusting to the rooting data of one soil type for predicting RLD values of the other soil type, however, indicated that still quite satisfactory estimates (r2=0.91 and 0.95) of RLD could be obtained.
KW - Cauliflower
KW - Dry matter production
KW - Minirhizotron method
KW - Model
KW - Roots
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033815812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033815812
VL - 223
SP - 131
EP - 145
JO - Plant and soil
JF - Plant and soil
SN - 0032-079X
IS - 1-2
ER -