Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 861-866 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Jan 2024 |
Abstract
The authors thank the discusser for the attention and interests on our previous work, entitled “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion” (referred to as the original paper/work in the following text). To demonstrate the increased seismic demands required by multipulse ground motions compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions, three cases were illustrated in the original work, including frame structures, a soil slope and a concrete dam. The discusser, Dr M.Amin Hariri-Ardebili, raised concerns on the seismic response of the dam, together with the optimal intensity measure of ground motions. Specifically, four subissues are involved, including effectiveness of the numerical model of dam, the damage index for dam, the selection strategy for input ground motions, and the ground motion intensity measures. Detailed responses to these issues are provided. In short, the main conclusion in the original paper that the multipulse ground motions potentially cause more severe damage compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions is reliable.
Keywords
- multipulse ground motion, near-fault earthquake, pulse-like ground motion, response spectrum, seismic damage analysis, seismic risk
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 53, No. 2, 09.01.2024, p. 861-866.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Response to discussion of “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion”
AU - Chen, Guan
AU - Yang, Jiashu
AU - Wang, Ruohan
AU - Li, Kaiqi
AU - Liu, Yong
AU - Beer, Michael
N1 - Funding Information: The authors have nothing to report.
PY - 2024/1/9
Y1 - 2024/1/9
N2 - The authors thank the discusser for the attention and interests on our previous work, entitled “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion” (referred to as the original paper/work in the following text). To demonstrate the increased seismic demands required by multipulse ground motions compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions, three cases were illustrated in the original work, including frame structures, a soil slope and a concrete dam. The discusser, Dr M.Amin Hariri-Ardebili, raised concerns on the seismic response of the dam, together with the optimal intensity measure of ground motions. Specifically, four subissues are involved, including effectiveness of the numerical model of dam, the damage index for dam, the selection strategy for input ground motions, and the ground motion intensity measures. Detailed responses to these issues are provided. In short, the main conclusion in the original paper that the multipulse ground motions potentially cause more severe damage compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions is reliable.
AB - The authors thank the discusser for the attention and interests on our previous work, entitled “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion” (referred to as the original paper/work in the following text). To demonstrate the increased seismic demands required by multipulse ground motions compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions, three cases were illustrated in the original work, including frame structures, a soil slope and a concrete dam. The discusser, Dr M.Amin Hariri-Ardebili, raised concerns on the seismic response of the dam, together with the optimal intensity measure of ground motions. Specifically, four subissues are involved, including effectiveness of the numerical model of dam, the damage index for dam, the selection strategy for input ground motions, and the ground motion intensity measures. Detailed responses to these issues are provided. In short, the main conclusion in the original paper that the multipulse ground motions potentially cause more severe damage compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions is reliable.
KW - multipulse ground motion
KW - near-fault earthquake
KW - pulse-like ground motion
KW - response spectrum
KW - seismic damage analysis
KW - seismic risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177890328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eqe.4046
DO - 10.1002/eqe.4046
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177890328
VL - 53
SP - 861
EP - 866
JO - Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
JF - Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
SN - 0098-8847
IS - 2
ER -