Relating popularity on Twitter and Linkedin to bibliometric indicators of visibility and interconnectedness: an analysis of 8512 applied researchers in Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • David Howoldt
  • Henning Kroll
  • Peter Neuhäusler

External Research Organisations

  • Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI)
  • Technische Universität Berlin
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5571-5594
Number of pages24
JournalSCIENTOMETRICS
Volume128
Issue number10
Early online date23 Aug 2023
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Abstract

We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature’s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers’ popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.

Keywords

    Altmetrics, Citation impact, LinkedIn, Research dissemination, Twitter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Relating popularity on Twitter and Linkedin to bibliometric indicators of visibility and interconnectedness: an analysis of 8512 applied researchers in Germany. / Howoldt, David; Kroll, Henning; Neuhäusler, Peter.
In: SCIENTOMETRICS, Vol. 128, No. 10, 10.2023, p. 5571-5594.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Howoldt D, Kroll H, Neuhäusler P. Relating popularity on Twitter and Linkedin to bibliometric indicators of visibility and interconnectedness: an analysis of 8512 applied researchers in Germany. SCIENTOMETRICS. 2023 Oct;128(10):5571-5594. Epub 2023 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04799-y
Download
@article{14cb8dddc8644660a020830c8ca0482a,
title = "Relating popularity on Twitter and Linkedin to bibliometric indicators of visibility and interconnectedness: an analysis of 8512 applied researchers in Germany",
abstract = "We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature{\textquoteright}s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers{\textquoteright} popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.",
keywords = "Altmetrics, Citation impact, LinkedIn, Research dissemination, Twitter",
author = "David Howoldt and Henning Kroll and Peter Neuh{\"a}usler",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s11192-023-04799-y",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "5571--5594",
journal = "SCIENTOMETRICS",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relating popularity on Twitter and Linkedin to bibliometric indicators of visibility and interconnectedness

T2 - an analysis of 8512 applied researchers in Germany

AU - Howoldt, David

AU - Kroll, Henning

AU - Neuhäusler, Peter

PY - 2023/10

Y1 - 2023/10

N2 - We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature’s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers’ popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.

AB - We analyse the degree to which the popularity of scientific authors on Twitter and LinkedIn corresponds to publication-based indicators as to their visibility and interconnectedness. Departing from the extant literature’s focus on the visibility of individual papers, we turn to the popularity of individuals on social media platforms. We explore whether this popularity is reflected in the visibility that researchers achieve and the collaborations they maintain in the publication domain. Studying a large sample of applied researchers in Germany, we find congruence between researchers’ popularity on social media, and both their visibility and interconnectedness in the publication domain. Comparing the effects of Twitter and LinkedIn engagement, we furthermore find that the characteristics of this relationship are associated with the intended function of the social media platform in which researchers engage. We conclude that social media platforms are a relevant channel of academic communication, alongside existing channels of formal and informal exchange.

KW - Altmetrics

KW - Citation impact

KW - LinkedIn

KW - Research dissemination

KW - Twitter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168623496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-023-04799-y

DO - 10.1007/s11192-023-04799-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85168623496

VL - 128

SP - 5571

EP - 5594

JO - SCIENTOMETRICS

JF - SCIENTOMETRICS

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 10

ER -