Regionalisierung Deutschlands anhand landwirtschaftlicher Strukturdaten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Roswitha Merle
  • Marc Busse
  • Galina Rechter
  • Uwe Meer

External Research Organisations

  • University of Veterinary Medicine of Hannover, Foundation
View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionRegionalisation of Germany by data of agricultural structures
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)52-59
Number of pages8
JournalBerliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift
Volume125
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Abstract

In order to simplify the design of representative studies in animal populations the structural differences of animal husbandry (cattle, pigs and laying hens) in Germany were characterised. Several regions were defined and thus districts identified which are typical for the respective region and can be regarded as representatives for the whole region. Data on animal husbandry as well as human population per district originated from the Federal Statistical Office and were linked to the geometric data of the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. By this, data of "livestock units/square kilometre area" and "farms/square kilometre area" per district were calculated using methods of the spatial statistics Global Moran's Index, Anselin Local Moran's Index and Getis- Ord Gi*. With the help of these analyses six clusters could be identified which resulted in four large (Middle, Northwest, East, and South) and one smaller region (Northern Upper-Rhine) respecting the federal state borders. These regions differed significantly regarding animal and farm densities. The selection of typical districts was carried out with the help of the respective animal and farm data of the species pigs, dairy cattle and laying hens. The means of the selected districts (three to six per region) were within the 60%- and the 80%-percentile of at least two of the analysed variables. Concerning the region Northern Upper-Rhine no representative district was selected. This presented regionalisation including representative districts can be used for the design of scientific studies that are associated with animal husbandry in Germany.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Regionalisierung Deutschlands anhand landwirtschaftlicher Strukturdaten. / Merle, Roswitha; Busse, Marc; Rechter, Galina et al.
In: Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, Vol. 125, No. 1-2, 01.2012, p. 52-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Merle R, Busse M, Rechter G, Meer U. Regionalisierung Deutschlands anhand landwirtschaftlicher Strukturdaten. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 2012 Jan;125(1-2):52-59. doi: 10.2376/0005-9366-125-52
Merle, Roswitha ; Busse, Marc ; Rechter, Galina et al. / Regionalisierung Deutschlands anhand landwirtschaftlicher Strukturdaten. In: Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 2012 ; Vol. 125, No. 1-2. pp. 52-59.
Download
@article{7161f0ca0a364779b6b010543cc7a7c1,
title = "Regionalisierung Deutschlands anhand landwirtschaftlicher Strukturdaten",
abstract = "In order to simplify the design of representative studies in animal populations the structural differences of animal husbandry (cattle, pigs and laying hens) in Germany were characterised. Several regions were defined and thus districts identified which are typical for the respective region and can be regarded as representatives for the whole region. Data on animal husbandry as well as human population per district originated from the Federal Statistical Office and were linked to the geometric data of the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. By this, data of {"}livestock units/square kilometre area{"} and {"}farms/square kilometre area{"} per district were calculated using methods of the spatial statistics Global Moran's Index, Anselin Local Moran's Index and Getis- Ord Gi*. With the help of these analyses six clusters could be identified which resulted in four large (Middle, Northwest, East, and South) and one smaller region (Northern Upper-Rhine) respecting the federal state borders. These regions differed significantly regarding animal and farm densities. The selection of typical districts was carried out with the help of the respective animal and farm data of the species pigs, dairy cattle and laying hens. The means of the selected districts (three to six per region) were within the 60%- and the 80%-percentile of at least two of the analysed variables. Concerning the region Northern Upper-Rhine no representative district was selected. This presented regionalisation including representative districts can be used for the design of scientific studies that are associated with animal husbandry in Germany.",
keywords = "Animal density, Farm density, Spatial statistics",
author = "Roswitha Merle and Marc Busse and Galina Rechter and Uwe Meer",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
doi = "10.2376/0005-9366-125-52",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "125",
pages = "52--59",
journal = "Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift",
issn = "0005-9366",
publisher = "Schluetersche GmbH und Co",
number = "1-2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regionalisierung Deutschlands anhand landwirtschaftlicher Strukturdaten

AU - Merle, Roswitha

AU - Busse, Marc

AU - Rechter, Galina

AU - Meer, Uwe

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - In order to simplify the design of representative studies in animal populations the structural differences of animal husbandry (cattle, pigs and laying hens) in Germany were characterised. Several regions were defined and thus districts identified which are typical for the respective region and can be regarded as representatives for the whole region. Data on animal husbandry as well as human population per district originated from the Federal Statistical Office and were linked to the geometric data of the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. By this, data of "livestock units/square kilometre area" and "farms/square kilometre area" per district were calculated using methods of the spatial statistics Global Moran's Index, Anselin Local Moran's Index and Getis- Ord Gi*. With the help of these analyses six clusters could be identified which resulted in four large (Middle, Northwest, East, and South) and one smaller region (Northern Upper-Rhine) respecting the federal state borders. These regions differed significantly regarding animal and farm densities. The selection of typical districts was carried out with the help of the respective animal and farm data of the species pigs, dairy cattle and laying hens. The means of the selected districts (three to six per region) were within the 60%- and the 80%-percentile of at least two of the analysed variables. Concerning the region Northern Upper-Rhine no representative district was selected. This presented regionalisation including representative districts can be used for the design of scientific studies that are associated with animal husbandry in Germany.

AB - In order to simplify the design of representative studies in animal populations the structural differences of animal husbandry (cattle, pigs and laying hens) in Germany were characterised. Several regions were defined and thus districts identified which are typical for the respective region and can be regarded as representatives for the whole region. Data on animal husbandry as well as human population per district originated from the Federal Statistical Office and were linked to the geometric data of the Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. By this, data of "livestock units/square kilometre area" and "farms/square kilometre area" per district were calculated using methods of the spatial statistics Global Moran's Index, Anselin Local Moran's Index and Getis- Ord Gi*. With the help of these analyses six clusters could be identified which resulted in four large (Middle, Northwest, East, and South) and one smaller region (Northern Upper-Rhine) respecting the federal state borders. These regions differed significantly regarding animal and farm densities. The selection of typical districts was carried out with the help of the respective animal and farm data of the species pigs, dairy cattle and laying hens. The means of the selected districts (three to six per region) were within the 60%- and the 80%-percentile of at least two of the analysed variables. Concerning the region Northern Upper-Rhine no representative district was selected. This presented regionalisation including representative districts can be used for the design of scientific studies that are associated with animal husbandry in Germany.

KW - Animal density

KW - Farm density

KW - Spatial statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859181221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2376/0005-9366-125-52

DO - 10.2376/0005-9366-125-52

M3 - Artikel

C2 - 22372325

AN - SCOPUS:84859181221

VL - 125

SP - 52

EP - 59

JO - Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift

JF - Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift

SN - 0005-9366

IS - 1-2

ER -