Regional gravity field modeling using free-positioned point masses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-226
Number of pages20
JournalStudia geophysica et geodaetica
Volume58
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 10 Feb 2014

Abstract

A two-step free-positioned point mass method is used for regional gravity field modeling together with the remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique. The Quasi-Newton algorithm (L-BFGS-B) is implemented to solve the nonlinear problem with bound constraints in the first step, while in the second step the magnitudes of the point masses are re-adjusted with known positions in the least-squares sense. In order to reach a good representation of the gravity field, a number of parameter sets have to be defined carefully before the computations. The effects of four important parameter sets (depth limits, number of point masses, original/reduced basis functions and optimization directions) are investigated for regional gravity field modeling based on two numerical test cases with synthetic and real data. The results show that the selection of the initial depth and depth limits is of most importance. The number of point masses for obtaining a good fit is affected by the data distribution, while a dependency on the data variability (signal variation) is negligible. Long-wavelength errors in the predicted height anomalies can be reduced significantly by using reduced basis functions, and the radial-direction optimization proves to be stable and reliable for regular and irregular data scenarios. If the parameter sets are defined properly, the solutions are similar to the ones computed by least-squares collocation (LSC), but require fewer unknowns than LSC.

Keywords

    depth limits, free-positioned point masses, regional gravity field modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Regional gravity field modeling using free-positioned point masses. / Lin, Miao; Denker, Heiner; Müller, Jürgen.
In: Studia geophysica et geodaetica, Vol. 58, No. 2, 10.02.2014, p. 207-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Lin M, Denker H, Müller J. Regional gravity field modeling using free-positioned point masses. Studia geophysica et geodaetica. 2014 Feb 10;58(2):207-226. doi: 10.1007/s11200-013-1145-7
Download
@article{8de289c2b32148ac8bf2cf4e9d93b78a,
title = "Regional gravity field modeling using free-positioned point masses",
abstract = "A two-step free-positioned point mass method is used for regional gravity field modeling together with the remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique. The Quasi-Newton algorithm (L-BFGS-B) is implemented to solve the nonlinear problem with bound constraints in the first step, while in the second step the magnitudes of the point masses are re-adjusted with known positions in the least-squares sense. In order to reach a good representation of the gravity field, a number of parameter sets have to be defined carefully before the computations. The effects of four important parameter sets (depth limits, number of point masses, original/reduced basis functions and optimization directions) are investigated for regional gravity field modeling based on two numerical test cases with synthetic and real data. The results show that the selection of the initial depth and depth limits is of most importance. The number of point masses for obtaining a good fit is affected by the data distribution, while a dependency on the data variability (signal variation) is negligible. Long-wavelength errors in the predicted height anomalies can be reduced significantly by using reduced basis functions, and the radial-direction optimization proves to be stable and reliable for regular and irregular data scenarios. If the parameter sets are defined properly, the solutions are similar to the ones computed by least-squares collocation (LSC), but require fewer unknowns than LSC.",
keywords = "depth limits, free-positioned point masses, regional gravity field modeling",
author = "Miao Lin and Heiner Denker and J{\"u}rgen M{\"u}ller",
note = "Funding information:: The first author was financially supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC).",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11200-013-1145-7",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "207--226",
journal = "Studia geophysica et geodaetica",
issn = "0039-3169",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional gravity field modeling using free-positioned point masses

AU - Lin, Miao

AU - Denker, Heiner

AU - Müller, Jürgen

N1 - Funding information:: The first author was financially supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC).

PY - 2014/2/10

Y1 - 2014/2/10

N2 - A two-step free-positioned point mass method is used for regional gravity field modeling together with the remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique. The Quasi-Newton algorithm (L-BFGS-B) is implemented to solve the nonlinear problem with bound constraints in the first step, while in the second step the magnitudes of the point masses are re-adjusted with known positions in the least-squares sense. In order to reach a good representation of the gravity field, a number of parameter sets have to be defined carefully before the computations. The effects of four important parameter sets (depth limits, number of point masses, original/reduced basis functions and optimization directions) are investigated for regional gravity field modeling based on two numerical test cases with synthetic and real data. The results show that the selection of the initial depth and depth limits is of most importance. The number of point masses for obtaining a good fit is affected by the data distribution, while a dependency on the data variability (signal variation) is negligible. Long-wavelength errors in the predicted height anomalies can be reduced significantly by using reduced basis functions, and the radial-direction optimization proves to be stable and reliable for regular and irregular data scenarios. If the parameter sets are defined properly, the solutions are similar to the ones computed by least-squares collocation (LSC), but require fewer unknowns than LSC.

AB - A two-step free-positioned point mass method is used for regional gravity field modeling together with the remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique. The Quasi-Newton algorithm (L-BFGS-B) is implemented to solve the nonlinear problem with bound constraints in the first step, while in the second step the magnitudes of the point masses are re-adjusted with known positions in the least-squares sense. In order to reach a good representation of the gravity field, a number of parameter sets have to be defined carefully before the computations. The effects of four important parameter sets (depth limits, number of point masses, original/reduced basis functions and optimization directions) are investigated for regional gravity field modeling based on two numerical test cases with synthetic and real data. The results show that the selection of the initial depth and depth limits is of most importance. The number of point masses for obtaining a good fit is affected by the data distribution, while a dependency on the data variability (signal variation) is negligible. Long-wavelength errors in the predicted height anomalies can be reduced significantly by using reduced basis functions, and the radial-direction optimization proves to be stable and reliable for regular and irregular data scenarios. If the parameter sets are defined properly, the solutions are similar to the ones computed by least-squares collocation (LSC), but require fewer unknowns than LSC.

KW - depth limits

KW - free-positioned point masses

KW - regional gravity field modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898546247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11200-013-1145-7

DO - 10.1007/s11200-013-1145-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84898546247

VL - 58

SP - 207

EP - 226

JO - Studia geophysica et geodaetica

JF - Studia geophysica et geodaetica

SN - 0039-3169

IS - 2

ER -

By the same author(s)