Regional gravity field modeling: Theory and practical results

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Heiner Denker

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSciences of Geodesy - II
Subtitle of host publicationInnovations and Future Developments
Pages185-291
Number of pages107
ISBN (electronic)9783642280009
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Abstract

Geodesy, with its three core areas positioning and reference systems, Earth rotation determination, and gravity field modeling, is striving for a relative accuracy of at least 10-9 for all relevant quantities, and to a great extent this goal has already been reached (10-9 corresponds to about 6 mm relative to the Earth's radius and in terms of gravity). Regarding gravity field modeling, the highest accuracy demands are from geodesy, especially Global Navigation Satellite System (GNNS) positioning, oceanography, and geophysics. In this context, the geoid and quasigeoid are of major interest; e.g., these quantities are required for the transformation between the purely geometric GNSS (ellipsoidal) heights and gravity field related heights as well as for the modeling of the (mean) dynamic ocean topography (DOT), requiring accuracies at the level of about 1 cm or even below. In this way, the importance of geoid and quasigeoid modelling has increased considerably-also for economic reasons-and as early as 1982 Torge (1982) postulated a renaissance of the geoid.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Regional gravity field modeling: Theory and practical results. / Denker, Heiner.
Sciences of Geodesy - II: Innovations and Future Developments. 2013. p. 185-291.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Denker, H 2013, Regional gravity field modeling: Theory and practical results. in Sciences of Geodesy - II: Innovations and Future Developments. pp. 185-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5
Denker, H. (2013). Regional gravity field modeling: Theory and practical results. In Sciences of Geodesy - II: Innovations and Future Developments (pp. 185-291) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5
Denker H. Regional gravity field modeling: Theory and practical results. In Sciences of Geodesy - II: Innovations and Future Developments. 2013. p. 185-291 Epub 2012 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5
Denker, Heiner. / Regional gravity field modeling : Theory and practical results. Sciences of Geodesy - II: Innovations and Future Developments. 2013. pp. 185-291
Download
@inbook{669f69d01b694dc486312d310f210cf8,
title = "Regional gravity field modeling: Theory and practical results",
abstract = "Geodesy, with its three core areas positioning and reference systems, Earth rotation determination, and gravity field modeling, is striving for a relative accuracy of at least 10-9 for all relevant quantities, and to a great extent this goal has already been reached (10-9 corresponds to about 6 mm relative to the Earth's radius and in terms of gravity). Regarding gravity field modeling, the highest accuracy demands are from geodesy, especially Global Navigation Satellite System (GNNS) positioning, oceanography, and geophysics. In this context, the geoid and quasigeoid are of major interest; e.g., these quantities are required for the transformation between the purely geometric GNSS (ellipsoidal) heights and gravity field related heights as well as for the modeling of the (mean) dynamic ocean topography (DOT), requiring accuracies at the level of about 1 cm or even below. In this way, the importance of geoid and quasigeoid modelling has increased considerably-also for economic reasons-and as early as 1982 Torge (1982) postulated a renaissance of the geoid.",
author = "Heiner Denker",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. All rights are reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "3642279996",
pages = "185--291",
booktitle = "Sciences of Geodesy - II",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Regional gravity field modeling

T2 - Theory and practical results

AU - Denker, Heiner

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. All rights are reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Geodesy, with its three core areas positioning and reference systems, Earth rotation determination, and gravity field modeling, is striving for a relative accuracy of at least 10-9 for all relevant quantities, and to a great extent this goal has already been reached (10-9 corresponds to about 6 mm relative to the Earth's radius and in terms of gravity). Regarding gravity field modeling, the highest accuracy demands are from geodesy, especially Global Navigation Satellite System (GNNS) positioning, oceanography, and geophysics. In this context, the geoid and quasigeoid are of major interest; e.g., these quantities are required for the transformation between the purely geometric GNSS (ellipsoidal) heights and gravity field related heights as well as for the modeling of the (mean) dynamic ocean topography (DOT), requiring accuracies at the level of about 1 cm or even below. In this way, the importance of geoid and quasigeoid modelling has increased considerably-also for economic reasons-and as early as 1982 Torge (1982) postulated a renaissance of the geoid.

AB - Geodesy, with its three core areas positioning and reference systems, Earth rotation determination, and gravity field modeling, is striving for a relative accuracy of at least 10-9 for all relevant quantities, and to a great extent this goal has already been reached (10-9 corresponds to about 6 mm relative to the Earth's radius and in terms of gravity). Regarding gravity field modeling, the highest accuracy demands are from geodesy, especially Global Navigation Satellite System (GNNS) positioning, oceanography, and geophysics. In this context, the geoid and quasigeoid are of major interest; e.g., these quantities are required for the transformation between the purely geometric GNSS (ellipsoidal) heights and gravity field related heights as well as for the modeling of the (mean) dynamic ocean topography (DOT), requiring accuracies at the level of about 1 cm or even below. In this way, the importance of geoid and quasigeoid modelling has increased considerably-also for economic reasons-and as early as 1982 Torge (1982) postulated a renaissance of the geoid.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929135560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-28000-9_5

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:84929135560

SN - 3642279996

SN - 9783642279997

SP - 185

EP - 291

BT - Sciences of Geodesy - II

ER -