Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Sabrina Hartmann
  • Jens Jenewein
  • Enno Giese
  • Sven Abend
  • Albert Roura
  • Ernst M. Rasel
  • Wolfgang P. Schleich

External Research Organisations

  • Ulm University
  • Texas A and M University
  • DLR-Institute of Quantum Technologies
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number053610
Number of pages16
JournalPhysical Review A
Volume101
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2020

Abstract

We provide a comprehensive study of atomic Raman and Bragg diffraction when coupling to a pair of counterpropagating light gratings (double diffraction) or to a single one (single diffraction) and discuss the transition from one case to the other in a retroreflective geometry as the Doppler detuning changes. In contrast to single diffraction, double Raman loses its advantage of high diffraction efficiency for short pulses and has to be performed in a Bragg-type regime. Moreover, the structure of double diffraction leads to further limitations for broad momentum distributions on the efficiency of mirror pulses, making the use of (ultra)cold ensembles essential for high diffraction efficiency.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries. / Hartmann, Sabrina; Jenewein, Jens; Giese, Enno et al.
In: Physical Review A, Vol. 101, No. 5, 053610, 08.05.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Hartmann, S, Jenewein, J, Giese, E, Abend, S, Roura, A, Rasel, EM & Schleich, WP 2020, 'Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries', Physical Review A, vol. 101, no. 5, 053610. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053610
Hartmann, S., Jenewein, J., Giese, E., Abend, S., Roura, A., Rasel, E. M., & Schleich, W. P. (2020). Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries. Physical Review A, 101(5), Article 053610. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053610
Hartmann S, Jenewein J, Giese E, Abend S, Roura A, Rasel EM et al. Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries. Physical Review A. 2020 May 8;101(5):053610. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053610
Hartmann, Sabrina ; Jenewein, Jens ; Giese, Enno et al. / Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries. In: Physical Review A. 2020 ; Vol. 101, No. 5.
Download
@article{48884cc3d5694ee88f62f67423b464a9,
title = "Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries",
abstract = "We provide a comprehensive study of atomic Raman and Bragg diffraction when coupling to a pair of counterpropagating light gratings (double diffraction) or to a single one (single diffraction) and discuss the transition from one case to the other in a retroreflective geometry as the Doppler detuning changes. In contrast to single diffraction, double Raman loses its advantage of high diffraction efficiency for short pulses and has to be performed in a Bragg-type regime. Moreover, the structure of double diffraction leads to further limitations for broad momentum distributions on the efficiency of mirror pulses, making the use of (ultra)cold ensembles essential for high diffraction efficiency.",
author = "Sabrina Hartmann and Jens Jenewein and Enno Giese and Sven Abend and Albert Roura and Rasel, {Ernst M.} and Schleich, {Wolfgang P.}",
note = "Funding Information: We thank C. M. Carmesin, A. Friedrich, M. Gebbe, and C. Schubert for fruitful discussions. This project was generously supported by the German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum f{\"u}r Luft- und Raumfahrt, DLR) with funds provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (Bundesministerium f{\"u}r Wirtschaft und Energie, BMWi) under the Grants No. 50WM1556 (QUANTUS IV), No. 50WM1956, No. 50WM1952 (QUANTUS V), No. 50WP1705, No. 50WP1700 (BECCAL), and No. 50RK1957 (QGYRO). The research of the is financially supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and Art Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg (Ministerium f{\"u}r Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg). The research of the Institut f{\"u}r Quantenoptik is financially supported by the CRC 1227 DQmat within the projects A05 and B07, the EXC 2123 Quantum Frontiers within the research units B02 and B05, the QUEST-LFS, the Association of German Engineers (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, VDI) with funds provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium f{\"u}r Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) under Grant No. VDI 13N14838 (TAIOL), and “Nieders{\"a}chsisches Vorab” through the “Quantum- and Nano-Metrology (QUANOMET)” initiative within the project QT3 as well as through “F{\"o}rderung von Wissenschaft und Technik in Forschung und Lehre” for the initial funding of research in the new DLR-SI Institute. W.P.S. is most grateful to Texas A&M University for a Faculty Fellowship at the Hagler Institute for Advanced Study at the Texas A&M University as well as to the Texas A&M AgriLife Research for its support. ",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053610",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
journal = "Physical Review A",
issn = "2469-9926",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regimes of atomic diffraction: Raman versus bragg diffraction in retroreflective geometries

AU - Hartmann, Sabrina

AU - Jenewein, Jens

AU - Giese, Enno

AU - Abend, Sven

AU - Roura, Albert

AU - Rasel, Ernst M.

AU - Schleich, Wolfgang P.

N1 - Funding Information: We thank C. M. Carmesin, A. Friedrich, M. Gebbe, and C. Schubert for fruitful discussions. This project was generously supported by the German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, DLR) with funds provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, BMWi) under the Grants No. 50WM1556 (QUANTUS IV), No. 50WM1956, No. 50WM1952 (QUANTUS V), No. 50WP1705, No. 50WP1700 (BECCAL), and No. 50RK1957 (QGYRO). The research of the is financially supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and Art Baden-Württemberg (Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg). The research of the Institut für Quantenoptik is financially supported by the CRC 1227 DQmat within the projects A05 and B07, the EXC 2123 Quantum Frontiers within the research units B02 and B05, the QUEST-LFS, the Association of German Engineers (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, VDI) with funds provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) under Grant No. VDI 13N14838 (TAIOL), and “Niedersächsisches Vorab” through the “Quantum- and Nano-Metrology (QUANOMET)” initiative within the project QT3 as well as through “Förderung von Wissenschaft und Technik in Forschung und Lehre” for the initial funding of research in the new DLR-SI Institute. W.P.S. is most grateful to Texas A&M University for a Faculty Fellowship at the Hagler Institute for Advanced Study at the Texas A&M University as well as to the Texas A&M AgriLife Research for its support.

PY - 2020/5/8

Y1 - 2020/5/8

N2 - We provide a comprehensive study of atomic Raman and Bragg diffraction when coupling to a pair of counterpropagating light gratings (double diffraction) or to a single one (single diffraction) and discuss the transition from one case to the other in a retroreflective geometry as the Doppler detuning changes. In contrast to single diffraction, double Raman loses its advantage of high diffraction efficiency for short pulses and has to be performed in a Bragg-type regime. Moreover, the structure of double diffraction leads to further limitations for broad momentum distributions on the efficiency of mirror pulses, making the use of (ultra)cold ensembles essential for high diffraction efficiency.

AB - We provide a comprehensive study of atomic Raman and Bragg diffraction when coupling to a pair of counterpropagating light gratings (double diffraction) or to a single one (single diffraction) and discuss the transition from one case to the other in a retroreflective geometry as the Doppler detuning changes. In contrast to single diffraction, double Raman loses its advantage of high diffraction efficiency for short pulses and has to be performed in a Bragg-type regime. Moreover, the structure of double diffraction leads to further limitations for broad momentum distributions on the efficiency of mirror pulses, making the use of (ultra)cold ensembles essential for high diffraction efficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085839860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053610

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053610

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85085839860

VL - 101

JO - Physical Review A

JF - Physical Review A

SN - 2469-9926

IS - 5

M1 - 053610

ER -