Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Catherine Herfeld
  • Johannes Marx

External Research Organisations

  • Universität Zürich (UZH)
  • University of Bamberg
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages54–85
Number of pages32
ISBN (electronic)9780197519837
ISBN (print)9780197519806
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

In this chapter, it is described and assessed how political scientists use rational choice theories to offer causal explanations. We observe that the ways in which rational choice theories are considered to be successful in political science differs, depending on the explanandum in question. Political scientists use empirical variants of rational choice theories to explain the political behavior of individual agents and analytical variants to explain the behavior of collective actors. Both variants are used for distinct explananda, which ask for different modes of explanation that raise in turn different explanatory demands toward rational choice theories. We argue that when political scientists discuss the explanatory usefulness of rational choice theories, they should assess them in light of the demands they are supposed to meet. This would enable a more nuanced and problem-oriented appraisal of rational choice theories in political science.

Keywords

    explanation in political science, explanatory power, rational choice explanation, rational choice theory (RCT)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science. / Herfeld, Catherine; Marx, Johannes.
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science. Oxford University Press, 2023. p. 54–85.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Herfeld, C & Marx, J 2023, Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science. in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science. Oxford University Press, pp. 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519806.013.4
Herfeld, C., & Marx, J. (2023). Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science (pp. 54–85). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519806.013.4
Herfeld C, Marx J. Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science. Oxford University Press. 2023. p. 54–85 doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519806.013.4
Herfeld, Catherine ; Marx, Johannes. / Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science. Oxford University Press, 2023. pp. 54–85
Download
@inbook{641af0d9d05d4b3b823a005850dddea7,
title = "Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science",
abstract = "In this chapter, it is described and assessed how political scientists use rational choice theories to offer causal explanations. We observe that the ways in which rational choice theories are considered to be successful in political science differs, depending on the explanandum in question. Political scientists use empirical variants of rational choice theories to explain the political behavior of individual agents and analytical variants to explain the behavior of collective actors. Both variants are used for distinct explananda, which ask for different modes of explanation that raise in turn different explanatory demands toward rational choice theories. We argue that when political scientists discuss the explanatory usefulness of rational choice theories, they should assess them in light of the demands they are supposed to meet. This would enable a more nuanced and problem-oriented appraisal of rational choice theories in political science.",
keywords = "explanation in political science, explanatory power, rational choice explanation, rational choice theory (RCT)",
author = "Catherine Herfeld and Johannes Marx",
note = "Acknowledgments Parts of this paper are grounded in Herfeld (2017) and Marx and Tiefensee (2015). Johannes Marx{\textquoteright}s research was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the context of the project “Simulating Collective Agency” (MA 4716/4-1).",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519806.013.4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780197519806",
pages = "54–85",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom (UK)",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Rational Choice Explanations in Political Science

AU - Herfeld, Catherine

AU - Marx, Johannes

N1 - Acknowledgments Parts of this paper are grounded in Herfeld (2017) and Marx and Tiefensee (2015). Johannes Marx’s research was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the context of the project “Simulating Collective Agency” (MA 4716/4-1).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In this chapter, it is described and assessed how political scientists use rational choice theories to offer causal explanations. We observe that the ways in which rational choice theories are considered to be successful in political science differs, depending on the explanandum in question. Political scientists use empirical variants of rational choice theories to explain the political behavior of individual agents and analytical variants to explain the behavior of collective actors. Both variants are used for distinct explananda, which ask for different modes of explanation that raise in turn different explanatory demands toward rational choice theories. We argue that when political scientists discuss the explanatory usefulness of rational choice theories, they should assess them in light of the demands they are supposed to meet. This would enable a more nuanced and problem-oriented appraisal of rational choice theories in political science.

AB - In this chapter, it is described and assessed how political scientists use rational choice theories to offer causal explanations. We observe that the ways in which rational choice theories are considered to be successful in political science differs, depending on the explanandum in question. Political scientists use empirical variants of rational choice theories to explain the political behavior of individual agents and analytical variants to explain the behavior of collective actors. Both variants are used for distinct explananda, which ask for different modes of explanation that raise in turn different explanatory demands toward rational choice theories. We argue that when political scientists discuss the explanatory usefulness of rational choice theories, they should assess them in light of the demands they are supposed to meet. This would enable a more nuanced and problem-oriented appraisal of rational choice theories in political science.

KW - explanation in political science

KW - explanatory power

KW - rational choice explanation

KW - rational choice theory (RCT)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190000571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519806.013.4

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519806.013.4

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

SN - 9780197519806

SP - 54

EP - 85

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -