Details
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 156-163 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Aug 2019 |
Abstract
This article examines the evaluation of the «Fachinformationsdienste für die Wissenschaft» (FID - specialised information services for science) funding programme, describes the methodological and temporal approach of the evaluation and outlines its key results. In addition, its evaluates the study from the perspective of the Ausschuss für Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Informationssysteme (AWBI - Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems) of the German Research Foundation (DFG), and presents the main recommendations for the further development of the funding programme. The conclusion of the evaluation is that the funding programme has been very successful and should therefore be extended. The funding conditions should be further developed, focusing on the tasks of a FID and the cooperation of all FID and libraries, with the overarching goal of establishing a jointly supported information infrastructure for science. Regular evaluations, the determination of (quantitative and qualitative) success factor indicators as well as a long-term financing perspective for long-term supraregional tasks still pose challenges.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- Library and Information Sciences
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, Vol. 66, No. 4, 15.08.2019, p. 156-163.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Quo vadis, Fachinformationsdienste?
T2 - Ein Überblick über die Ergebnisse der Evaluierung des Förderprogramms «Fachinformationsdienste»
AU - Oevel, Gudrun
AU - Barlösius, Eva
N1 - Teile dieses Artikels greifen auf Dokumente zurück, die im Laufe der FID-Förderung und Evaluierung entstanden sind (siehe Literaturliste). An einigen Stellen wurden Formulierungen der Stellungnahme der Kommission direkt übernommen, um die vom Präsidium verabschiedeten förderpolitischen Implikationen wortgetreu wiederzugeben. Der besondere Dank der Autorinnen richtet sich an die Mitglieder der Evaluierungskommission, die Mitglieder der DFG-Geschäftsstelle, insbesondere die für das FID-Programm zuständigen DFG-Mitarbeitenden, Frau Dr. Michaela Bilic-Merdes und ehemals Herr Dr. Christoph Kümmel, die Verantwortlichen der Prognos AG für ihr Engagement bei der Begleitung des Prozesses. Auch vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus den Bibliotheken sei an dieser Stelle für ihr wertvolles Feedback gedankt.
PY - 2019/8/15
Y1 - 2019/8/15
N2 - This article examines the evaluation of the «Fachinformationsdienste für die Wissenschaft» (FID - specialised information services for science) funding programme, describes the methodological and temporal approach of the evaluation and outlines its key results. In addition, its evaluates the study from the perspective of the Ausschuss für Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Informationssysteme (AWBI - Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems) of the German Research Foundation (DFG), and presents the main recommendations for the further development of the funding programme. The conclusion of the evaluation is that the funding programme has been very successful and should therefore be extended. The funding conditions should be further developed, focusing on the tasks of a FID and the cooperation of all FID and libraries, with the overarching goal of establishing a jointly supported information infrastructure for science. Regular evaluations, the determination of (quantitative and qualitative) success factor indicators as well as a long-term financing perspective for long-term supraregional tasks still pose challenges.
AB - This article examines the evaluation of the «Fachinformationsdienste für die Wissenschaft» (FID - specialised information services for science) funding programme, describes the methodological and temporal approach of the evaluation and outlines its key results. In addition, its evaluates the study from the perspective of the Ausschuss für Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Informationssysteme (AWBI - Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems) of the German Research Foundation (DFG), and presents the main recommendations for the further development of the funding programme. The conclusion of the evaluation is that the funding programme has been very successful and should therefore be extended. The funding conditions should be further developed, focusing on the tasks of a FID and the cooperation of all FID and libraries, with the overarching goal of establishing a jointly supported information infrastructure for science. Regular evaluations, the determination of (quantitative and qualitative) success factor indicators as well as a long-term financing perspective for long-term supraregional tasks still pose challenges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071913978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3196/186429501966413
DO - 10.3196/186429501966413
M3 - Übersichtsarbeit
AN - SCOPUS:85071913978
VL - 66
SP - 156
EP - 163
JO - Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie
JF - Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie
SN - 0044-2380
IS - 4
ER -