Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 33 |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
2018.
Research output: Working paper/Preprint › Working paper/Discussion paper
}
TY - UNPB
T1 - Public Statements of Good Conduct Promote Pro-Social Behavior
AU - Koessler, Ann-Kathrin
AU - Page, Lionel
AU - Dulleck, Uwe
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Voluntary and compulsory public statements of good conduct are frequently observed in the real world, such as the codes of good conduct for professionals or the requirements of academic journals to affirm that research was carried out ethically. In this study, we investigate what effect public statements of good conduct have on contribution behavior in a public goods experiment. Using a 'between-within subjects design' we identify three channels by which non-enforceable statements of intent are associated with higher levels of contributions to the public good. First, in a selection effect, socially-oriented participants are more likely in the experiment to make a public statement. Second, in a commitment effect, participants who make a public statement are contributing more to the public good. Third, in a coordination effect, aggregate contributions are higher when 'Statement-Makers' observe that also other group members make the statement. The latter explains why compulsory statements of good conduct are in our experiment more effective over time.
AB - Voluntary and compulsory public statements of good conduct are frequently observed in the real world, such as the codes of good conduct for professionals or the requirements of academic journals to affirm that research was carried out ethically. In this study, we investigate what effect public statements of good conduct have on contribution behavior in a public goods experiment. Using a 'between-within subjects design' we identify three channels by which non-enforceable statements of intent are associated with higher levels of contributions to the public good. First, in a selection effect, socially-oriented participants are more likely in the experiment to make a public statement. Second, in a commitment effect, participants who make a public statement are contributing more to the public good. Third, in a coordination effect, aggregate contributions are higher when 'Statement-Makers' observe that also other group members make the statement. The latter explains why compulsory statements of good conduct are in our experiment more effective over time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85115537434&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3184836
DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3184836
M3 - Working paper/Discussion paper
BT - Public Statements of Good Conduct Promote Pro-Social Behavior
ER -