Preemptive Action: Measuring Presidential Assertiveness in Foreign Policy Lawmaking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)763-780
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume51
Issue number6
Early online date9 Nov 2022
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Abstract

To what extent and under which conditions do presidents challenge foreign policy legislation through Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)? While the presidents’ use of executive orders and signing statements has been studied extensively, this paper argues that SAPs are a subtler and less politically costly tool that is more important than scholars realized. Delivered at a crucial intervention point along the legislative process, these communications provide a key gateway for assertive presidential challenges. Relying on a novel assertiveness-score, this paper finds that SAPs target legislative content more aggressively over time and that the composition of government predicts executive assertiveness particularly well. Next to that, I show that presidents are more assertive when their term comes to an end. These insights contribute to our understanding of spiking interbranch tensions in American Politics.

Keywords

    executive-legislative relations, presidents, foreign policy, Lawmaking, lawmaking, statements of administration policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Research Area (based on ÖFOS 2012)

Cite this

Preemptive Action: Measuring Presidential Assertiveness in Foreign Policy Lawmaking. / Wiedekind, Jakob.
In: American Politics Research, Vol. 51, No. 6, 11.2023, p. 763-780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{8ee72d823b504ccda5adef6438fde02b,
title = "Preemptive Action: Measuring Presidential Assertiveness in Foreign Policy Lawmaking",
abstract = "To what extent and under which conditions do presidents challenge foreign policy legislation through Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)? While the presidents{\textquoteright} use of executive orders and signing statements has been studied extensively, this paper argues that SAPs are a subtler and less politically costly tool that is more important than scholars realized. Delivered at a crucial intervention point along the legislative process, these communications provide a key gateway for assertive presidential challenges. Relying on a novel assertiveness-score, this paper finds that SAPs target legislative content more aggressively over time and that the composition of government predicts executive assertiveness particularly well. Next to that, I show that presidents are more assertive when their term comes to an end. These insights contribute to our understanding of spiking interbranch tensions in American Politics.",
keywords = "executive-legislative relations, presidents, foreign policy, Lawmaking, lawmaking, statements of administration policy",
author = "Jakob Wiedekind",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1177/1532673x221135550",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "763--780",
journal = "American Politics Research",
issn = "1532-673X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preemptive Action

T2 - Measuring Presidential Assertiveness in Foreign Policy Lawmaking

AU - Wiedekind, Jakob

PY - 2023/11

Y1 - 2023/11

N2 - To what extent and under which conditions do presidents challenge foreign policy legislation through Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)? While the presidents’ use of executive orders and signing statements has been studied extensively, this paper argues that SAPs are a subtler and less politically costly tool that is more important than scholars realized. Delivered at a crucial intervention point along the legislative process, these communications provide a key gateway for assertive presidential challenges. Relying on a novel assertiveness-score, this paper finds that SAPs target legislative content more aggressively over time and that the composition of government predicts executive assertiveness particularly well. Next to that, I show that presidents are more assertive when their term comes to an end. These insights contribute to our understanding of spiking interbranch tensions in American Politics.

AB - To what extent and under which conditions do presidents challenge foreign policy legislation through Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)? While the presidents’ use of executive orders and signing statements has been studied extensively, this paper argues that SAPs are a subtler and less politically costly tool that is more important than scholars realized. Delivered at a crucial intervention point along the legislative process, these communications provide a key gateway for assertive presidential challenges. Relying on a novel assertiveness-score, this paper finds that SAPs target legislative content more aggressively over time and that the composition of government predicts executive assertiveness particularly well. Next to that, I show that presidents are more assertive when their term comes to an end. These insights contribute to our understanding of spiking interbranch tensions in American Politics.

KW - executive-legislative relations

KW - presidents

KW - foreign policy

KW - Lawmaking

KW - lawmaking

KW - statements of administration policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142119979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532673x221135550

DO - 10.1177/1532673x221135550

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 763

EP - 780

JO - American Politics Research

JF - American Politics Research

SN - 1532-673X

IS - 6

ER -

By the same author(s)