Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Gemechis Dilba
  • Frank Bretz
  • Ludwig A. Hothorn
  • Volker Guiard

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Novartis AG
  • Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1131-1147
Number of pages17
JournalStatistics in medicine
Volume25
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2006

Abstract

In this paper, we address the problem of calculating power and sample sizes associated with simultaneous tests for non-inferiority. We consider the case of comparing several experimental treatments with an active control. The approach is based on the ratio view, where the common non-inferiority margin is chosen to be some percentage of the mean of the control treatment. Two power definitions in multiple hypothesis testing, namely, complete power and minimal power, are used in the computations. The sample sizes associated with the ratio-based inference are also compared with that of a comparable inference based on the difference of means for various scenarios. It is found that the sample size required for ratio-based inferences is smaller than that of difference-based inferences when the relative non-inferiority margin is less than one and when large response values indicate better treatment effects. The results are illustrated with examples.

Keywords

    Least favourable configuration, Multiple comparison, Non-central t, Non-inferiority, Ratio-to-control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins. / Dilba, Gemechis; Bretz, Frank; Hothorn, Ludwig A. et al.
In: Statistics in medicine, Vol. 25, No. 7, 11.10.2006, p. 1131-1147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Dilba G, Bretz F, Hothorn LA, Guiard V. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins. Statistics in medicine. 2006 Oct 11;25(7):1131-1147. doi: 10.1002/sim.2359
Dilba, Gemechis ; Bretz, Frank ; Hothorn, Ludwig A. et al. / Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins. In: Statistics in medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 1131-1147.
Download
@article{46530ddc550440b4851d6ae80b52420e,
title = "Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins",
abstract = "In this paper, we address the problem of calculating power and sample sizes associated with simultaneous tests for non-inferiority. We consider the case of comparing several experimental treatments with an active control. The approach is based on the ratio view, where the common non-inferiority margin is chosen to be some percentage of the mean of the control treatment. Two power definitions in multiple hypothesis testing, namely, complete power and minimal power, are used in the computations. The sample sizes associated with the ratio-based inference are also compared with that of a comparable inference based on the difference of means for various scenarios. It is found that the sample size required for ratio-based inferences is smaller than that of difference-based inferences when the relative non-inferiority margin is less than one and when large response values indicate better treatment effects. The results are illustrated with examples.",
keywords = "Least favourable configuration, Multiple comparison, Non-central t, Non-inferiority, Ratio-to-control",
author = "Gemechis Dilba and Frank Bretz and Hothorn, {Ludwig A.} and Volker Guiard",
year = "2006",
month = oct,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1002/sim.2359",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1131--1147",
journal = "Statistics in medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins

AU - Dilba, Gemechis

AU - Bretz, Frank

AU - Hothorn, Ludwig A.

AU - Guiard, Volker

PY - 2006/10/11

Y1 - 2006/10/11

N2 - In this paper, we address the problem of calculating power and sample sizes associated with simultaneous tests for non-inferiority. We consider the case of comparing several experimental treatments with an active control. The approach is based on the ratio view, where the common non-inferiority margin is chosen to be some percentage of the mean of the control treatment. Two power definitions in multiple hypothesis testing, namely, complete power and minimal power, are used in the computations. The sample sizes associated with the ratio-based inference are also compared with that of a comparable inference based on the difference of means for various scenarios. It is found that the sample size required for ratio-based inferences is smaller than that of difference-based inferences when the relative non-inferiority margin is less than one and when large response values indicate better treatment effects. The results are illustrated with examples.

AB - In this paper, we address the problem of calculating power and sample sizes associated with simultaneous tests for non-inferiority. We consider the case of comparing several experimental treatments with an active control. The approach is based on the ratio view, where the common non-inferiority margin is chosen to be some percentage of the mean of the control treatment. Two power definitions in multiple hypothesis testing, namely, complete power and minimal power, are used in the computations. The sample sizes associated with the ratio-based inference are also compared with that of a comparable inference based on the difference of means for various scenarios. It is found that the sample size required for ratio-based inferences is smaller than that of difference-based inferences when the relative non-inferiority margin is less than one and when large response values indicate better treatment effects. The results are illustrated with examples.

KW - Least favourable configuration

KW - Multiple comparison

KW - Non-central t

KW - Non-inferiority

KW - Ratio-to-control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645465471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sim.2359

DO - 10.1002/sim.2359

M3 - Article

C2 - 16217842

AN - SCOPUS:33645465471

VL - 25

SP - 1131

EP - 1147

JO - Statistics in medicine

JF - Statistics in medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 7

ER -