Details
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 90-97 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | DISP |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Abstract
Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- Geography, Planning and Development
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: DISP, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2016, p. 90-97.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Planung(skultur)en zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis
AU - Zibell, Barbara
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 ETH–Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.
AB - Planning culture is more than planning in terms of the activity performed (planning practice), and it is more than the object of reflection about methods and instruments, systems and institutions of spatial planning (planning theory). Based on current discourse on planning culture(s), the following article reports on experiences with planning cultures in Switzerland and Germany, leading to a position on the additional value of planning culture knowledge for further development of the discipline. In doing so, it becomes apparent that reflecting on planning culture(s) may disrupt academic thinking, resulting in a dichotomy–that is to say, the science of spatial planning on the one hand, planning practice on the other–and open up new horizons towards a contextual understanding of the sphere of spatial planning activity and decision-making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009080858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02513625.2016.1273674
DO - 10.1080/02513625.2016.1273674
M3 - Artikel
AN - SCOPUS:85009080858
VL - 52
SP - 90
EP - 97
JO - DISP
JF - DISP
SN - 0251-3625
IS - 4
ER -