Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 70-78 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Coastal engineering |
| Volume | 117 |
| Early online date | 6 Aug 2016 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2016 |
Abstract
Moving water exerts drag forces on vegetation. The susceptibility of vegetation to bending and breakage determines its flow resistance, and chances of survival, under hydrodynamic loading. To evaluate the role of individual vegetation parameters in this water-vegetation interaction, we conducted drag force measurements under a wide range of wave loadings in a large wave flume. Artificial vegetation elements were used to manipulate stiffness, frontal area in still water and material volume as a proxy for biomass. The aim was to compare: (i) identical volume but different still frontal area, (ii) identical stiffness but different still frontal area, and (iii) identical still frontal area but different volume. Comparison of mimic arrangements showed that stiffness and the dynamic frontal area (i.e., frontal area resulting from bending which depends on stiffness and hydrodynamic forcing) determine drag forces. Only at low orbital-flow velocities did the still frontal area dominate the force-velocity relationship and it is hypothesised that no mimic bending took place under these conditions. Mimic arrangements with identical stiffness but different overall material volume and still frontal area showed that forces do not increase linearly with increasing material volume and it is proposed that short distances between mimics cause their interaction and result in additional drag forces. A model, based on effective leaf length and characteristic plant width developed for unidirectional flow, performed well for the force time series under both regular and irregular waves. However, its uncertainty increased with increasing interaction of neighbouring mimics.
Keywords
- Biomass, Drag force, Frontal area, Plant mimics, Stiffness, Wave forcing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Engineering
- Engineering(all)
- Ocean Engineering
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Coastal engineering, Vol. 117, 01.11.2016, p. 70-78.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Plant stiffness and biomass as drivers for drag forces under extreme wave loading
T2 - A flume study on mimics
AU - Paul, Maike
AU - Rupprecht, Franziska
AU - Möller, Iris
AU - Bouma, Tjeerd J.
AU - Spencer, Tom
AU - Kudella, Matthias
AU - Wolters, Guido
AU - van Wesenbeeck, Bregje K.
AU - Jensen, Kai
AU - Miranda-Lange, Martin
AU - Schimmels, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information: We thank all of the staff at the Grosser Wellenkanal as well as B. Evans, J. Tempest, K. Milonidis and C. Edwards, Cambridge University, and D. Schulze, Hamburg University, for their invaluable logistical assistance. Our gratitude also goes to two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly helped to improve the manuscript. The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community's 7th Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrating Activity HYDRALAB IV , Contract no. 261529 and a grant from The Isaac Newton Trust, Trinity College, Cambridge ( 11.35(s) ). M. Paul acknowledges funding by the German Science Foundation (grant no. PA 2547/1-1 ).
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Moving water exerts drag forces on vegetation. The susceptibility of vegetation to bending and breakage determines its flow resistance, and chances of survival, under hydrodynamic loading. To evaluate the role of individual vegetation parameters in this water-vegetation interaction, we conducted drag force measurements under a wide range of wave loadings in a large wave flume. Artificial vegetation elements were used to manipulate stiffness, frontal area in still water and material volume as a proxy for biomass. The aim was to compare: (i) identical volume but different still frontal area, (ii) identical stiffness but different still frontal area, and (iii) identical still frontal area but different volume. Comparison of mimic arrangements showed that stiffness and the dynamic frontal area (i.e., frontal area resulting from bending which depends on stiffness and hydrodynamic forcing) determine drag forces. Only at low orbital-flow velocities did the still frontal area dominate the force-velocity relationship and it is hypothesised that no mimic bending took place under these conditions. Mimic arrangements with identical stiffness but different overall material volume and still frontal area showed that forces do not increase linearly with increasing material volume and it is proposed that short distances between mimics cause their interaction and result in additional drag forces. A model, based on effective leaf length and characteristic plant width developed for unidirectional flow, performed well for the force time series under both regular and irregular waves. However, its uncertainty increased with increasing interaction of neighbouring mimics.
AB - Moving water exerts drag forces on vegetation. The susceptibility of vegetation to bending and breakage determines its flow resistance, and chances of survival, under hydrodynamic loading. To evaluate the role of individual vegetation parameters in this water-vegetation interaction, we conducted drag force measurements under a wide range of wave loadings in a large wave flume. Artificial vegetation elements were used to manipulate stiffness, frontal area in still water and material volume as a proxy for biomass. The aim was to compare: (i) identical volume but different still frontal area, (ii) identical stiffness but different still frontal area, and (iii) identical still frontal area but different volume. Comparison of mimic arrangements showed that stiffness and the dynamic frontal area (i.e., frontal area resulting from bending which depends on stiffness and hydrodynamic forcing) determine drag forces. Only at low orbital-flow velocities did the still frontal area dominate the force-velocity relationship and it is hypothesised that no mimic bending took place under these conditions. Mimic arrangements with identical stiffness but different overall material volume and still frontal area showed that forces do not increase linearly with increasing material volume and it is proposed that short distances between mimics cause their interaction and result in additional drag forces. A model, based on effective leaf length and characteristic plant width developed for unidirectional flow, performed well for the force time series under both regular and irregular waves. However, its uncertainty increased with increasing interaction of neighbouring mimics.
KW - Biomass
KW - Drag force
KW - Frontal area
KW - Plant mimics
KW - Stiffness
KW - Wave forcing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982860073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.07.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84982860073
VL - 117
SP - 70
EP - 78
JO - Coastal engineering
JF - Coastal engineering
SN - 0378-3839
ER -