Perimeter recombination in 25%-efficient IBC solar cells with passivating POLO contacts for both polarities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Felix Haase
  • Sören Schäfer
  • Christina Klamt
  • Fabian Kiefer
  • Jan Krügener
  • Rolf Brendel
  • Robby Peibst

External Research Organisations

  • Institute for Solar Energy Research (ISFH)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-29
Number of pages7
JournalIEEE journal of photovoltaics
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date2 Nov 2017
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Abstract

We introduce a method for the quantification of perimeter recombination in solar cells based on infrared lifetime measurements. We apply this method at a 25.0%-efficient interdigitated back contact (IBC) silicon solar cell with passivating contacts. The implied pseudo-efficiency determined by infrared lifetime mapping is 26.2% at an intermediate process step. The 1.2%abs loss is attributed to a process-related reduction in surface passivation quality, recombination in the perimeter area, and series resistance. The 2×2 cm2-sized cell is processed on a 100mmwafer. We determine the implied pseudo-efficiency with illuminated and with shaded perimeter area during infrared lifetime mapping. The difference between both implied pseudo-efficiencies yields the efficiency loss by perimeter recombination, which is determined to be 0.4%abs for a wafer resistivity of 1.3 ω cm and even 0.9%abs for a wafer resistivity of 80 ω cm.

Keywords

    Charge carrier lifetime analysis, Passivating contacts, Perimeter recombination, Photovoltaic cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Perimeter recombination in 25%-efficient IBC solar cells with passivating POLO contacts for both polarities. / Haase, Felix; Schäfer, Sören; Klamt, Christina et al.
In: IEEE journal of photovoltaics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 23-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Haase F, Schäfer S, Klamt C, Kiefer F, Krügener J, Brendel R et al. Perimeter recombination in 25%-efficient IBC solar cells with passivating POLO contacts for both polarities. IEEE journal of photovoltaics. 2018 Jan;8(1):23-29. Epub 2017 Nov 2. doi: 10.1109/jphotov.2017.2762592
Haase, Felix ; Schäfer, Sören ; Klamt, Christina et al. / Perimeter recombination in 25%-efficient IBC solar cells with passivating POLO contacts for both polarities. In: IEEE journal of photovoltaics. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 23-29.
Download
@article{0f6f951b51864383b0e6a27be764f7fd,
title = "Perimeter recombination in 25%-efficient IBC solar cells with passivating POLO contacts for both polarities",
abstract = "We introduce a method for the quantification of perimeter recombination in solar cells based on infrared lifetime measurements. We apply this method at a 25.0%-efficient interdigitated back contact (IBC) silicon solar cell with passivating contacts. The implied pseudo-efficiency determined by infrared lifetime mapping is 26.2% at an intermediate process step. The 1.2%abs loss is attributed to a process-related reduction in surface passivation quality, recombination in the perimeter area, and series resistance. The 2×2 cm2-sized cell is processed on a 100mmwafer. We determine the implied pseudo-efficiency with illuminated and with shaded perimeter area during infrared lifetime mapping. The difference between both implied pseudo-efficiencies yields the efficiency loss by perimeter recombination, which is determined to be 0.4%abs for a wafer resistivity of 1.3 ω cm and even 0.9%abs for a wafer resistivity of 80 ω cm.",
keywords = "Charge carrier lifetime analysis, Passivating contacts, Perimeter recombination, Photovoltaic cells",
author = "Felix Haase and S{\"o}ren Sch{\"a}fer and Christina Klamt and Fabian Kiefer and Jan Kr{\"u}gener and Rolf Brendel and Robby Peibst",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2017 IEEE.",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1109/jphotov.2017.2762592",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "23--29",
journal = "IEEE journal of photovoltaics",
issn = "2156-3381",
publisher = "IEEE Electron Devices Society",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perimeter recombination in 25%-efficient IBC solar cells with passivating POLO contacts for both polarities

AU - Haase, Felix

AU - Schäfer, Sören

AU - Klamt, Christina

AU - Kiefer, Fabian

AU - Krügener, Jan

AU - Brendel, Rolf

AU - Peibst, Robby

N1 - © 2017 IEEE.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - We introduce a method for the quantification of perimeter recombination in solar cells based on infrared lifetime measurements. We apply this method at a 25.0%-efficient interdigitated back contact (IBC) silicon solar cell with passivating contacts. The implied pseudo-efficiency determined by infrared lifetime mapping is 26.2% at an intermediate process step. The 1.2%abs loss is attributed to a process-related reduction in surface passivation quality, recombination in the perimeter area, and series resistance. The 2×2 cm2-sized cell is processed on a 100mmwafer. We determine the implied pseudo-efficiency with illuminated and with shaded perimeter area during infrared lifetime mapping. The difference between both implied pseudo-efficiencies yields the efficiency loss by perimeter recombination, which is determined to be 0.4%abs for a wafer resistivity of 1.3 ω cm and even 0.9%abs for a wafer resistivity of 80 ω cm.

AB - We introduce a method for the quantification of perimeter recombination in solar cells based on infrared lifetime measurements. We apply this method at a 25.0%-efficient interdigitated back contact (IBC) silicon solar cell with passivating contacts. The implied pseudo-efficiency determined by infrared lifetime mapping is 26.2% at an intermediate process step. The 1.2%abs loss is attributed to a process-related reduction in surface passivation quality, recombination in the perimeter area, and series resistance. The 2×2 cm2-sized cell is processed on a 100mmwafer. We determine the implied pseudo-efficiency with illuminated and with shaded perimeter area during infrared lifetime mapping. The difference between both implied pseudo-efficiencies yields the efficiency loss by perimeter recombination, which is determined to be 0.4%abs for a wafer resistivity of 1.3 ω cm and even 0.9%abs for a wafer resistivity of 80 ω cm.

KW - Charge carrier lifetime analysis

KW - Passivating contacts

KW - Perimeter recombination

KW - Photovoltaic cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034445019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/jphotov.2017.2762592

DO - 10.1109/jphotov.2017.2762592

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034445019

VL - 8

SP - 23

EP - 29

JO - IEEE journal of photovoltaics

JF - IEEE journal of photovoltaics

SN - 2156-3381

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)