Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints: A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Minjin Cai
  • Hehua Zhu
  • Qing Chen
  • Timon Rabczuk
  • Xiaoying Zhuang

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Tongji University
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere03138
Number of pages22
JournalCase Studies in Construction Materials
Volume20
Early online date7 Apr 2024
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Abstract

Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.

Keywords

    Cracking resistance, Engineered Cementitious Composites, Joint ductility, Joint toughness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints: A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete. / Cai, Minjin; Zhu, Hehua; Chen, Qing et al.
In: Case Studies in Construction Materials, Vol. 20, e03138, 07.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Cai, M., Zhu, H., Chen, Q., Rabczuk, T., & Zhuang, X. (2024). Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints: A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20, Article e03138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138
Cai M, Zhu H, Chen Q, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X. Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints: A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2024 Jul;20:e03138. Epub 2024 Apr 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138
Cai, Minjin ; Zhu, Hehua ; Chen, Qing et al. / Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints : A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete. In: Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2024 ; Vol. 20.
Download
@article{756b1597f5b84b648bd7e6b04298676e,
title = "Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints: A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete",
abstract = "Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.",
keywords = "Cracking resistance, Engineered Cementitious Composites, Joint ductility, Joint toughness",
author = "Minjin Cai and Hehua Zhu and Qing Chen and Timon Rabczuk and Xiaoying Zhuang",
note = "Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge to the project 52278411 and 22JC14041001, which are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action. ",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138",
language = "English",
volume = "20",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) in shield tunnel segmental joints

T2 - A comparative study with ordinary reinforced concrete

AU - Cai, Minjin

AU - Zhu, Hehua

AU - Chen, Qing

AU - Rabczuk, Timon

AU - Zhuang, Xiaoying

N1 - Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge to the project 52278411 and 22JC14041001, which are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action.

PY - 2024/7

Y1 - 2024/7

N2 - Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.

AB - Shield tunnel segmental joints are traditionally vulnerable, limited by their tensile capacity and susceptibility to cracking. Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) offer a promising solution due to their superior tensile strength, exceptional crack resistance, and remarkable toughness. However, the application of ECC in tunnel segment joints remains unexplored. To address this gap, this paper conducted comprehensive full-scale tests of ECC segmental joints versus ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) segmental joints. It investigated mechanical responses including material behavior, deflection, joint action, bolt strain, crack development, and failure modes. Results revealed that: (1) ECC joints provided a 33.97 % higher stable bearing capacity and a 50 % increase in initial cracking strength compared to RC joints. (2) ECC joints excelled in crack control, maintaining crack widths below 0.2 mm, while RC joints experienced significant cracking with widths exceeding 1 mm. (3) In terms of toughness, ECC joints surpassed RC by 66 % in the elastic stage and 123 % in the normal serviceability stage, with 96 % higher ductility. (4) ECC joints significantly outperformed RC joints in bolt stress uniformity and concentration, achieving a 43.21 % reduction in average bolt stress. (5) Regarding multi-scale mechanical effects, ECC joints increased the toughness and strength advantage over RC by more than 45 % in the elastic phase. These results reveal the potential of ECC in significantly enhancing the durability and resilience of shield tunnels, particularly in harsh environments subjected to high ground stress or seismic activities.

KW - Cracking resistance

KW - Engineered Cementitious Composites

KW - Joint ductility

KW - Joint toughness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190943296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138

DO - 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03138

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85190943296

VL - 20

JO - Case Studies in Construction Materials

JF - Case Studies in Construction Materials

SN - 2214-5095

M1 - e03138

ER -