Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • K. Klose
  • S. Kreimeier
  • U. Tangermann
  • I. Aumann
  • K. Damm

External Research Organisations

  • Bielefeld University
  • Hannover Medical School (MHH)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number18
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Economics Review
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 21 May 2016

Abstract

With the shift towards patient-centered healthcare, patient- and person-reports of health-related factors, including outcomes, are seen as important determinants for evaluating and improving healthcare. However, a comprehensive, systematic categorization of patient- and person-reports is currently lacking in the literature. This study aims at developing a new classification system with well-defined constructs for patients’ and persons’ self-reports on health and healthcare. A literature research and evaluation by the Reported Health Outcomes (RHO) Group were used to develop this classification system. The new classification system includes patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction related to healthcare and health outcomes. Moreover, the most constitutive methods to measure these four categories – preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – have been described in this article. Even though the value of patients’ and persons’ perspectives on healthcare is increasingly being recognized, its measurement and implementation presents a lasting challenge to researchers, clinicians, patients, and the general population.

Keywords

    Experiences, Patient reports, Patient-reported outcomes/PRO, Preference, Satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay. / Klose, K.; Kreimeier, S.; Tangermann, U. et al.
In: Health Economics Review, Vol. 6, 18, 21.05.2016, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Klose, K, Kreimeier, S, Tangermann, U, Aumann, I & Damm, K 2016, 'Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay', Health Economics Review, vol. 6, 18, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6
Klose, K., Kreimeier, S., Tangermann, U., Aumann, I., & Damm, K. (2016). Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay. Health Economics Review, 6, 1-11. Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6
Klose K, Kreimeier S, Tangermann U, Aumann I, Damm K. Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay. Health Economics Review. 2016 May 21;6:1-11. 18. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6
Klose, K. ; Kreimeier, S. ; Tangermann, U. et al. / Patient- and person-reports on healthcare : preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay. In: Health Economics Review. 2016 ; Vol. 6. pp. 1-11.
Download
@article{c6427b0dcb24446c80bc86901e05ea9d,
title = "Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay",
abstract = "With the shift towards patient-centered healthcare, patient- and person-reports of health-related factors, including outcomes, are seen as important determinants for evaluating and improving healthcare. However, a comprehensive, systematic categorization of patient- and person-reports is currently lacking in the literature. This study aims at developing a new classification system with well-defined constructs for patients{\textquoteright} and persons{\textquoteright} self-reports on health and healthcare. A literature research and evaluation by the Reported Health Outcomes (RHO) Group were used to develop this classification system. The new classification system includes patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction related to healthcare and health outcomes. Moreover, the most constitutive methods to measure these four categories – preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – have been described in this article. Even though the value of patients{\textquoteright} and persons{\textquoteright} perspectives on healthcare is increasingly being recognized, its measurement and implementation presents a lasting challenge to researchers, clinicians, patients, and the general population.",
keywords = "Experiences, Patient reports, Patient-reported outcomes/PRO, Preference, Satisfaction",
author = "K. Klose and S. Kreimeier and U. Tangermann and I. Aumann and K. Damm",
note = "Funding Information: The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access fund of Leibniz University Hannover. Further members of the RHO Group who made substantial contributions to the conception of the study and to the development of the new classification system: J.-Matthias, Graf von der Schulenburgb (jms@ivbl.uni-hannover.de) Wolfgang, Greinera(wolfgang.greiner@uni-bielefeld.de) Volker, Amelungc (Amelung.Volker@mh-hannover.de) Christian, Krauthc (Krauth.Christian@mh-hannover.de) a) Health Economics and Health Care Management, University of Bielefeld, Germany (P.O. Box 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld) b) Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Germany (Otto-Brenner-Stra{\ss}e 1, 30159 Hannover) c) Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Germany (Carl-Neuberg-Stra{\ss}e 1, 30625 Hannover) 1Health Economics and Health Care Management, University of Bielefeld, P.O. Box 10 01 3133501 Bielefeld, Germany. 2Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Stra{\ss}e 1, 30159 Hannover, Germany. 3Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Stra{\ss}e 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--11",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient- and person-reports on healthcare

T2 - preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay

AU - Klose, K.

AU - Kreimeier, S.

AU - Tangermann, U.

AU - Aumann, I.

AU - Damm, K.

N1 - Funding Information: The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access fund of Leibniz University Hannover. Further members of the RHO Group who made substantial contributions to the conception of the study and to the development of the new classification system: J.-Matthias, Graf von der Schulenburgb (jms@ivbl.uni-hannover.de) Wolfgang, Greinera(wolfgang.greiner@uni-bielefeld.de) Volker, Amelungc (Amelung.Volker@mh-hannover.de) Christian, Krauthc (Krauth.Christian@mh-hannover.de) a) Health Economics and Health Care Management, University of Bielefeld, Germany (P.O. Box 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld) b) Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Germany (Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159 Hannover) c) Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Germany (Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover) 1Health Economics and Health Care Management, University of Bielefeld, P.O. Box 10 01 3133501 Bielefeld, Germany. 2Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Otto-Brenner-Straße 1, 30159 Hannover, Germany. 3Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

PY - 2016/5/21

Y1 - 2016/5/21

N2 - With the shift towards patient-centered healthcare, patient- and person-reports of health-related factors, including outcomes, are seen as important determinants for evaluating and improving healthcare. However, a comprehensive, systematic categorization of patient- and person-reports is currently lacking in the literature. This study aims at developing a new classification system with well-defined constructs for patients’ and persons’ self-reports on health and healthcare. A literature research and evaluation by the Reported Health Outcomes (RHO) Group were used to develop this classification system. The new classification system includes patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction related to healthcare and health outcomes. Moreover, the most constitutive methods to measure these four categories – preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – have been described in this article. Even though the value of patients’ and persons’ perspectives on healthcare is increasingly being recognized, its measurement and implementation presents a lasting challenge to researchers, clinicians, patients, and the general population.

AB - With the shift towards patient-centered healthcare, patient- and person-reports of health-related factors, including outcomes, are seen as important determinants for evaluating and improving healthcare. However, a comprehensive, systematic categorization of patient- and person-reports is currently lacking in the literature. This study aims at developing a new classification system with well-defined constructs for patients’ and persons’ self-reports on health and healthcare. A literature research and evaluation by the Reported Health Outcomes (RHO) Group were used to develop this classification system. The new classification system includes patient- and person-reported preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction related to healthcare and health outcomes. Moreover, the most constitutive methods to measure these four categories – preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – have been described in this article. Even though the value of patients’ and persons’ perspectives on healthcare is increasingly being recognized, its measurement and implementation presents a lasting challenge to researchers, clinicians, patients, and the general population.

KW - Experiences

KW - Patient reports

KW - Patient-reported outcomes/PRO

KW - Preference

KW - Satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971201048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6

DO - 10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971201048

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Health Economics Review

JF - Health Economics Review

SN - 2191-1991

M1 - 18

ER -