Paradigms lost - paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyperconstructions

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar
EditorsLotte Sommerer, Elena Smirnova
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages277-315
Number of pages39
ISBN (electronic)9789027261298
ISBN (print)9789027205445
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2020

Publication series

NameConstructional Approaches to Language
Volume27
ISSN (Print)1573-594X

Abstract

Based on Diewald (2009, 2015a, 2017), it is claimed that the notion of paradigm needs to be introduced into constructional accounts, as otherwise the essence of grammaticalization cannot be properly captured in construction grammar. It is suggested to define grammatical paradigms as a new node type, a “hyper-construction”, which represents the categorical, non-gradient specifics of grammatical meaning. This line of argumentation is supported by a discussion of changes in the German and English modality, tense, determiner, and number paradigms. Independent arguments for the psychological reality of paradigms come from the study of implicational relations in inflectional morphology and diachronic phenomena such as layering, suppletion, and paradigm pressure.

Keywords

    Constructional link, Constructional network, Gradience, Grammatical category, Grammaticalization, Hyper-construction, Inheritance, Paradigm, Paradigmatic relation, Paradigmaticization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Paradigms lost - paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyperconstructions. / Diewald, Gabriele.
Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar. ed. / Lotte Sommerer; Elena Smirnova. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020. p. 277-315 (Constructional Approaches to Language; Vol. 27).

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Diewald, G 2020, Paradigms lost - paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyperconstructions. in L Sommerer & E Smirnova (eds), Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar. Constructional Approaches to Language, vol. 27, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 277-315. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.08die
Diewald, G. (2020). Paradigms lost - paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyperconstructions. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar (pp. 277-315). (Constructional Approaches to Language; Vol. 27). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.08die
Diewald G. Paradigms lost - paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyperconstructions. In Sommerer L, Smirnova E, editors, Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2020. p. 277-315. (Constructional Approaches to Language). doi: 10.1075/cal.27.08die
Diewald, Gabriele. / Paradigms lost - paradigms regained : Paradigms as hyperconstructions. Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar. editor / Lotte Sommerer ; Elena Smirnova. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020. pp. 277-315 (Constructional Approaches to Language).
Download
@inbook{de70e04929ef43e6bf6d2bb9a0710c47,
title = "Paradigms lost - paradigms regained: Paradigms as hyperconstructions",
abstract = "Based on Diewald (2009, 2015a, 2017), it is claimed that the notion of paradigm needs to be introduced into constructional accounts, as otherwise the essence of grammaticalization cannot be properly captured in construction grammar. It is suggested to define grammatical paradigms as a new node type, a “hyper-construction”, which represents the categorical, non-gradient specifics of grammatical meaning. This line of argumentation is supported by a discussion of changes in the German and English modality, tense, determiner, and number paradigms. Independent arguments for the psychological reality of paradigms come from the study of implicational relations in inflectional morphology and diachronic phenomena such as layering, suppletion, and paradigm pressure.",
keywords = "Constructional link, Constructional network, Gradience, Grammatical category, Grammaticalization, Hyper-construction, Inheritance, Paradigm, Paradigmatic relation, Paradigmaticization",
author = "Gabriele Diewald",
year = "2020",
month = may,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1075/cal.27.08die",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027205445",
series = "Constructional Approaches to Language",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
pages = "277--315",
editor = "Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova",
booktitle = "Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Paradigms lost - paradigms regained

T2 - Paradigms as hyperconstructions

AU - Diewald, Gabriele

PY - 2020/5/13

Y1 - 2020/5/13

N2 - Based on Diewald (2009, 2015a, 2017), it is claimed that the notion of paradigm needs to be introduced into constructional accounts, as otherwise the essence of grammaticalization cannot be properly captured in construction grammar. It is suggested to define grammatical paradigms as a new node type, a “hyper-construction”, which represents the categorical, non-gradient specifics of grammatical meaning. This line of argumentation is supported by a discussion of changes in the German and English modality, tense, determiner, and number paradigms. Independent arguments for the psychological reality of paradigms come from the study of implicational relations in inflectional morphology and diachronic phenomena such as layering, suppletion, and paradigm pressure.

AB - Based on Diewald (2009, 2015a, 2017), it is claimed that the notion of paradigm needs to be introduced into constructional accounts, as otherwise the essence of grammaticalization cannot be properly captured in construction grammar. It is suggested to define grammatical paradigms as a new node type, a “hyper-construction”, which represents the categorical, non-gradient specifics of grammatical meaning. This line of argumentation is supported by a discussion of changes in the German and English modality, tense, determiner, and number paradigms. Independent arguments for the psychological reality of paradigms come from the study of implicational relations in inflectional morphology and diachronic phenomena such as layering, suppletion, and paradigm pressure.

KW - Constructional link

KW - Constructional network

KW - Gradience

KW - Grammatical category

KW - Grammaticalization

KW - Hyper-construction

KW - Inheritance

KW - Paradigm

KW - Paradigmatic relation

KW - Paradigmaticization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086660857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/cal.27.08die

DO - 10.1075/cal.27.08die

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

SN - 9789027205445

T3 - Constructional Approaches to Language

SP - 277

EP - 315

BT - Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar

A2 - Sommerer, Lotte

A2 - Smirnova, Elena

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

CY - Amsterdam

ER -

By the same author(s)