TY - JOUR

T1 - Orange peel disorder in sweet cherry

T2 - Mechanism and triggers

AU - Schlegel, Henrik Jürgen

AU - Grimm, Eckhard

AU - Winkler, Andreas

AU - Knoche, Moritz

N1 - Funding information: This work was funded in part by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft . We thank Peter Grimm-Wetzel, Martin Kockerols, and Martin Clever for the supply of fruit, Velma Nafula Mwibanda for quantifying cell sizes in the outer flesh and Sandy Lang for critical comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Skin shrivelling of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), referred to here as ‘orange-peel’ disorder, compromises fruit appearance and thus market value. The objectives were to establish a protocol to describe and quantify orange peel disorder and to identify the mechanism and factors determining its incidence. Fruit was stored for 28 to 33 d at 2 °C and 76% RH and orange peel disorder was quantified as a topographical roughness using an interferometer or by rating the fruit for orange peel using a four-step scoring scheme. Fruit with orange peel disorder had a skin topography similar to that of a citrus fruit − just on a finer scale. Under the conditions of the test, orange peel was first visible after ∼7 d and continued to increase in severity thereafter. Orange peel was most severe on the shoulder and in the equatorial and distal regions of the fruit. There was no relationship between the distribution of orange peel and that of stomata or of microcracking. At a microscopic level, the depressions in the fruit surface were markedly larger than the periclinal areas of individual epidermal cells, but similar in size to the mesh formed by the network of minor veins visible just beneath the skin. Susceptibility to orange peel differed among cultivars. Least susceptible were ‘Dönissens Gelbe’ and, ‘Gil Peck’, intermediate were ‘Sam’, ‘Kordia’, ‘Merchant’, and the sour cherry ‘Ungarische Traubige’, and most susceptible were ‘Adriana’, ‘Regina’, and ‘Hedelfinger’. Incidence of orange peel during storage was negatively related to relative humidity (more at lower humidities) but also developed at 100% RH in the absence of transpiration. Submerging fruit in water for 2 d partly reversed orange peel. There was no significant difference in the permeance of the skins or in turgors of cells of the outer mesocarp between fruit without and with orange peel. There was a significant difference between the osmotic potential of the flesh (more negative) and that of the skin (less negative). During storage, the osmotic potentials of flesh and skin both decreased slightly, but the difference between them remained constant. The results show water loss from the skin is causal in orange peel disorder. The water loss from the skin occurs both by two routes: (1) transpiration to the atmosphere and also (2) by osmotic dehydration to the flesh.

AB - Skin shrivelling of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), referred to here as ‘orange-peel’ disorder, compromises fruit appearance and thus market value. The objectives were to establish a protocol to describe and quantify orange peel disorder and to identify the mechanism and factors determining its incidence. Fruit was stored for 28 to 33 d at 2 °C and 76% RH and orange peel disorder was quantified as a topographical roughness using an interferometer or by rating the fruit for orange peel using a four-step scoring scheme. Fruit with orange peel disorder had a skin topography similar to that of a citrus fruit − just on a finer scale. Under the conditions of the test, orange peel was first visible after ∼7 d and continued to increase in severity thereafter. Orange peel was most severe on the shoulder and in the equatorial and distal regions of the fruit. There was no relationship between the distribution of orange peel and that of stomata or of microcracking. At a microscopic level, the depressions in the fruit surface were markedly larger than the periclinal areas of individual epidermal cells, but similar in size to the mesh formed by the network of minor veins visible just beneath the skin. Susceptibility to orange peel differed among cultivars. Least susceptible were ‘Dönissens Gelbe’ and, ‘Gil Peck’, intermediate were ‘Sam’, ‘Kordia’, ‘Merchant’, and the sour cherry ‘Ungarische Traubige’, and most susceptible were ‘Adriana’, ‘Regina’, and ‘Hedelfinger’. Incidence of orange peel during storage was negatively related to relative humidity (more at lower humidities) but also developed at 100% RH in the absence of transpiration. Submerging fruit in water for 2 d partly reversed orange peel. There was no significant difference in the permeance of the skins or in turgors of cells of the outer mesocarp between fruit without and with orange peel. There was a significant difference between the osmotic potential of the flesh (more negative) and that of the skin (less negative). During storage, the osmotic potentials of flesh and skin both decreased slightly, but the difference between them remained constant. The results show water loss from the skin is causal in orange peel disorder. The water loss from the skin occurs both by two routes: (1) transpiration to the atmosphere and also (2) by osmotic dehydration to the flesh.

KW - Cell wall

KW - Cuticle

KW - Permeance

KW - Shrivel

KW - Stomata

KW - Storage

KW - Transpiration

KW - Turgor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035754677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.11.018

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85035754677

VL - 137

SP - 119

EP - 128

JO - Postharvest Biology and Technology

JF - Postharvest Biology and Technology

SN - 0925-5214

ER -