Oral versus written recall of long-term memory items: Replicating and extending the writing superiority effect across knowledge domains

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • University of Tübingen
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-272
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychology
Volume131
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Abstract

Although language production offers a commonly used window into individuals' knowledge, it remains questionable whether oral or written language production allows better diagnostic content validity, for example, in educational or legal settings. Existing results vary with respect to empirical evidence in favor of the oral or the written modality in knowledge assessment. However, for list-like organized knowledge domains (i.e., domains consisting of a definite number of uniform items), a writing superiority effect (WSE) has been consistently observed. We present 3 experiments in which the WSE is replicated and generalized to hitherto untested knowledge domains and participant pools. To estimate the content validity of the verbal recall modes, free recall performance is analyzed as a function of modality, taking into account cued recall performance, which is known to allow more complete knowledge recollection. Throughout all experiments, free recall performance was better in the written than in the oral diagnosis of list-like knowledge. The results recommend written diagnosis at least for similarly structured knowledge domains. Future research should investigate to which degree writing superiority also holds for other kinds of knowledge domains and which language production and retrieval processes are responsible for the effect.

Keywords

    Knowledge diagnosis, Language production, Recall, Speaking, Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Oral versus written recall of long-term memory items: Replicating and extending the writing superiority effect across knowledge domains. / Janczyk, Markus; Aßmann, Martin; Grabowski, Joachim.
In: American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 131, No. 3, 2018, p. 263-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{d8fb13affaaf4283a440d658b6a95a76,
title = "Oral versus written recall of long-term memory items: Replicating and extending the writing superiority effect across knowledge domains",
abstract = "Although language production offers a commonly used window into individuals' knowledge, it remains questionable whether oral or written language production allows better diagnostic content validity, for example, in educational or legal settings. Existing results vary with respect to empirical evidence in favor of the oral or the written modality in knowledge assessment. However, for list-like organized knowledge domains (i.e., domains consisting of a definite number of uniform items), a writing superiority effect (WSE) has been consistently observed. We present 3 experiments in which the WSE is replicated and generalized to hitherto untested knowledge domains and participant pools. To estimate the content validity of the verbal recall modes, free recall performance is analyzed as a function of modality, taking into account cued recall performance, which is known to allow more complete knowledge recollection. Throughout all experiments, free recall performance was better in the written than in the oral diagnosis of list-like knowledge. The results recommend written diagnosis at least for similarly structured knowledge domains. Future research should investigate to which degree writing superiority also holds for other kinds of knowledge domains and which language production and retrieval processes are responsible for the effect.",
keywords = "Knowledge diagnosis, Language production, Recall, Speaking, Writing",
author = "Markus Janczyk and Martin A{\ss}mann and Joachim Grabowski",
note = "Funding Information: The work of M.J. is supported by the Institutional Strategy of the University of T{\"u}bingen (Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft/German Research Foundation ZUK 6). Experiment ㄀ was approved by the German Ministry of Defense. Address correspondence to Markus Janczyk, Eberhard Karls University of T{\"u}bingen?Department of ?sychol-ogy, Schleichstra{\ss}e 4, 72076 T{\"u}bingen, Germany (e-mail: markus.janczyk@uni-tuebingen.de). ",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.3.0263",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "263--272",
journal = "American Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0002-9556",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oral versus written recall of long-term memory items

T2 - Replicating and extending the writing superiority effect across knowledge domains

AU - Janczyk, Markus

AU - Aßmann, Martin

AU - Grabowski, Joachim

N1 - Funding Information: The work of M.J. is supported by the Institutional Strategy of the University of Tübingen (Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft/German Research Foundation ZUK 6). Experiment ㄀ was approved by the German Ministry of Defense. Address correspondence to Markus Janczyk, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen?Department of ?sychol-ogy, Schleichstraße 4, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (e-mail: markus.janczyk@uni-tuebingen.de).

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Although language production offers a commonly used window into individuals' knowledge, it remains questionable whether oral or written language production allows better diagnostic content validity, for example, in educational or legal settings. Existing results vary with respect to empirical evidence in favor of the oral or the written modality in knowledge assessment. However, for list-like organized knowledge domains (i.e., domains consisting of a definite number of uniform items), a writing superiority effect (WSE) has been consistently observed. We present 3 experiments in which the WSE is replicated and generalized to hitherto untested knowledge domains and participant pools. To estimate the content validity of the verbal recall modes, free recall performance is analyzed as a function of modality, taking into account cued recall performance, which is known to allow more complete knowledge recollection. Throughout all experiments, free recall performance was better in the written than in the oral diagnosis of list-like knowledge. The results recommend written diagnosis at least for similarly structured knowledge domains. Future research should investigate to which degree writing superiority also holds for other kinds of knowledge domains and which language production and retrieval processes are responsible for the effect.

AB - Although language production offers a commonly used window into individuals' knowledge, it remains questionable whether oral or written language production allows better diagnostic content validity, for example, in educational or legal settings. Existing results vary with respect to empirical evidence in favor of the oral or the written modality in knowledge assessment. However, for list-like organized knowledge domains (i.e., domains consisting of a definite number of uniform items), a writing superiority effect (WSE) has been consistently observed. We present 3 experiments in which the WSE is replicated and generalized to hitherto untested knowledge domains and participant pools. To estimate the content validity of the verbal recall modes, free recall performance is analyzed as a function of modality, taking into account cued recall performance, which is known to allow more complete knowledge recollection. Throughout all experiments, free recall performance was better in the written than in the oral diagnosis of list-like knowledge. The results recommend written diagnosis at least for similarly structured knowledge domains. Future research should investigate to which degree writing superiority also holds for other kinds of knowledge domains and which language production and retrieval processes are responsible for the effect.

KW - Knowledge diagnosis

KW - Language production

KW - Recall

KW - Speaking

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051632049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.3.0263

DO - 10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.3.0263

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051632049

VL - 131

SP - 263

EP - 272

JO - American Journal of Psychology

JF - American Journal of Psychology

SN - 0002-9556

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)